Gorman Emily, Kirkham Sam
Department of Linguistics and English Language, Lancaster University, County South, Lancaster, LA1 4YL, United Kingdom.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2020 Aug;148(2):724. doi: 10.1121/10.0001721.
This study examines dynamic acoustic-articulatory relations in back vowels, focusing on the effect of different coda consonants on acoustic-articulatory dynamics in the production of vowel contrast. This paper specifically investigates the contribution of the tongue and the lips in modifying F2 in the foot-goose contrast in English, using synchronized acoustic and electromagnetic articulography data collected from 16 speakers. The vowels foot and goose were elicited in pre-coronal and pre-lateral contexts from two dialects that are reported to be at different stages of back vowel fronting: Southern Standard British English and West Yorkshire English. The results suggest similar acoustic and articulatory patterns in pre-coronal vowels, but there is stronger evidence of vowel contrast in articulation than acoustics for pre-lateral vowels. The lip protrusion data do not help to resolve these differences, suggesting that the complex gestural makeup of a vowel-lateral sequence problematizes straightforward accounts of acoustic-articulatory relations. Further analysis reveals greater between-speaker variability in lingual advancement than F2 in pre-lateral vowels.
本研究考察后元音中的动态声学-发音关系,重点关注不同韵尾辅音对元音对比产生过程中声学-发音动态的影响。本文具体研究了在英语“foot”和“goose”对比中,舌头和嘴唇对F2的影响,使用了从16名说话者收集的同步声学和电磁发音成像数据。“foot”和“goose”这两个元音是在冠音前和边音前的语境中引出的,这两种语境来自两种据报道处于后元音前移不同阶段的方言:标准英国南部英语和西约克郡英语。结果表明,冠音前元音在声学和发音模式上相似,但对于边音前元音,发音中元音对比的证据比声学上的更强。唇部突出数据无助于解决这些差异,这表明元音-边音序列复杂的手势构成使得对声学-发音关系的直接解释变得复杂。进一步分析表明,在边音前元音中,说话者之间舌部前移的变异性比F2的变异性更大。