Department of Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1N 6N5.
Proc Biol Sci. 2020 Sep 9;287(1934):20201111. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.1111. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
How genetic variation arises and persists over evolutionary time despite the depleting effects of natural selection remains a long-standing question. Here, we investigate the impacts of two extreme forms of population regulation-at the level of the total, mixed population (hard selection) and at the level of local, spatially distinct patches (soft selection)-on the emergence and fate of diversity under strong divergent selection. We find that while the form of population regulation has little effect on rates of diversification, it can modulate the long-term fate of genetic variation, diversity being more readily maintained under soft selection compared to hard selection. The mechanism responsible for coexistence is negative frequency-dependent selection which, while present initially under both forms of population regulation, persists over the long-term only under soft selection. Importantly, coexistence is robust to continued evolution of niche specialist types under soft selection but not hard selection. These results suggest that soft selection could be a general mechanism for the maintenance of ecological diversity over evolutionary time scales.
尽管自然选择的消耗作用,遗传变异如何在进化过程中产生和持续存在仍然是一个长期存在的问题。在这里,我们研究了两种极端的种群调节形式——在总体混合种群水平(硬选择)和在局部、空间上不同斑块水平(软选择)——对强分歧选择下多样性的出现和命运的影响。我们发现,尽管种群调节形式对多样化率几乎没有影响,但它可以调节遗传变异的长期命运,与硬选择相比,软选择更容易维持多样性。共存的机制是负频率依赖性选择,尽管在两种种群调节形式下最初都存在,但只有在软选择下才能长期存在。重要的是,软选择下的生态位专化类型的持续进化是稳定的,但硬选择下则不然。这些结果表明,软选择可能是在进化时间尺度上维持生态多样性的一般机制。