• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全国耳鼻喉科医生日常使用电子病历的趋势。

National Trends in Daily Ambulatory Electronic Health Record Use by Otolaryngologists.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, U.S.A.

Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kanas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas, U.S.A.

出版信息

Laryngoscope. 2021 May;131(5):975-981. doi: 10.1002/lary.29073. Epub 2020 Sep 2.

DOI:10.1002/lary.29073
PMID:32876342
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Since their development in the 1970s electronic health records (EHRs) are now nearly ubiquitous. This study aims to characterize the daily interactions of otolaryngology providers with EHRs.

METHODS

This study was a cross-sectional review of provider efficiency profile (PEP) data, as collected by a major EHR vendor. Participating institutions had 6 months of de-identified PEP data reviewed starting January 1, 2019. PEP data is generated for providers with scheduled patients, both attendings and advanced practice providers (APPs). Time metrics are recorded when a provider is interacting with the EHR including a 5-second time-out for inactivity.

RESULTS

Data on 269 otolaryngologists and 29 APPs from 10 institutions were evaluated. On scheduled ambulatory clinic days attendings spent 70 ± 36 (mean ± standard deviation) min interacting in the EHR versus 108 ± 46 min for APPs. Of the daily EHR time, mean time in notes, clinical review, in basket, orders, and schedule were 30.1 ± 19.4, 9.6 ± 6.1, 7.3 ± 5.8, and 5.8 ± 7.6 min, respectively. Per patient visit, median (interquartile range) time in notes, clinical review, and orders were 3.19 (2.2-4.9), 1.14 (0.63-1.8), and 0.70 (0.47-1.05) min, respectively. Mean progress note length was 4638 ± 2143 characters.

CONCLUSION

Otolaryngology providers spend a meaningful portion of their clinic day interacting with the EHR. PEP data may provide means to target interventions and a metric to measure the impact of those interventions on provider EHR efficiency.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 131:975-981, 2021.

摘要

目的

自 20 世纪 70 年代电子健康记录(EHR)问世以来,它已近乎无处不在。本研究旨在描述耳鼻喉科医生与 EHR 的日常交互。

方法

本研究是对主要 EHR 供应商收集的提供者效率档案(PEP)数据进行的横断面回顾。参与的机构从 2019 年 1 月 1 日开始审查了 6 个月的去识别 PEP 数据。PEP 数据是为有预约患者的医生(包括主治医生和高级实践提供者)生成的。当提供者与 EHR 交互时,会记录时间度量,包括 5 秒的无活动超时。

结果

共评估了来自 10 家机构的 269 名耳鼻喉科医生和 29 名 APP 的数据。在门诊预约日,主治医生在 EHR 中的交互时间为 70±36 分钟(平均值±标准差),而 APP 则为 108±46 分钟。在日常 EHR 时间中,记录、临床审查、待处理医嘱、医嘱和日程安排的平均时间分别为 30.1±19.4、9.6±6.1、7.3±5.8 和 5.8±7.6 分钟。每位患者就诊时,记录、临床审查和医嘱的中位数(四分位距)时间分别为 3.19(2.2-4.9)、1.14(0.63-1.8)和 0.70(0.47-1.05)分钟。平均进度记录长度为 4638±2143 个字符。

结论

耳鼻喉科医生在他们的临床日中花费了相当一部分时间与 EHR 进行交互。PEP 数据可能为针对干预措施提供了一种手段,并提供了一种衡量这些干预措施对提供者 EHR 效率影响的指标。

证据水平

3 级喉镜,131:975-981,2021。

相似文献

1
National Trends in Daily Ambulatory Electronic Health Record Use by Otolaryngologists.全国耳鼻喉科医生日常使用电子病历的趋势。
Laryngoscope. 2021 May;131(5):975-981. doi: 10.1002/lary.29073. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
2
Perceptions of Electronic Health Records Within Otolaryngology Residents Compared to Practicing Otolaryngologists.与执业耳鼻喉科医生相比,耳鼻喉科住院医师对电子健康记录的认知。
Laryngoscope. 2018 Dec;128(12):2726-2731. doi: 10.1002/lary.27273. Epub 2018 Sep 8.
3
Association Between Electronic Medical Record Implementation and Otolaryngologist Productivity in the Ambulatory Setting.电子病历系统实施与耳鼻喉科医生在门诊环境下的工作效率之间的关联。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Jan 1;143(1):20-24. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2016.2528.
4
Assessment of Electronic Health Record Use Between US and Non-US Health Systems.评估美国与非美国医疗体系间电子健康记录的使用情况。
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Feb 1;181(2):251-259. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.7071.
5
Have you got the time? Challenges using vendor electronic health record metrics of provider efficiency.你有时刻吗?利用供应商电子健康记录衡量供应商效率面临的挑战。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Apr 1;27(4):644-646. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz222.
6
Medical Scribe Impact on Patient and Provider Experience.医学抄写员对患者和医疗服务提供者体验的影响。
Mil Med. 2019 Oct 1;184(9-10):388-393. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usz030.
7
Otolaryngology resident clinic participation and attending electronic health record efficiency-A user activity logs study.耳鼻喉科住院医师门诊参与情况及主治医生电子健康记录效率——一项用户活动日志研究
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2021 Aug 28;6(5):968-974. doi: 10.1002/lio2.648. eCollection 2021 Oct.
8
Changes in Electronic Health Record Use Time and Documentation over the Course of a Decade.电子健康记录使用时间和文档记录在十年间的变化。
Ophthalmology. 2019 Jun;126(6):783-791. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.01.011. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
9
The role and utilization of electronic medical records in ambulatory otolaryngology.电子病历在门诊耳鼻喉科的作用和应用。
Laryngoscope. 2013 Oct;123(10):2418-22. doi: 10.1002/lary.24104. Epub 2013 Apr 25.
10
Publicly Reported Patient Satisfaction Scores in Academic Otolaryngology Departments.学术耳鼻喉科公开报告的患者满意度评分
Laryngoscope. 2021 Oct;131(10):2204-2210. doi: 10.1002/lary.29557. Epub 2021 Apr 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Feasibility of Automated Precharting using GPT-4 in New Specialty Referrals.在新专科转诊中使用GPT-4进行自动预图表记录的可行性
AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2025 Jun 10;2025:312-321. eCollection 2025.
2
Benchmarking Emergency Physician EHR Time per Encounter Based on Patient and Clinical Factors.基于患者和临床因素对每次会诊时急诊医师电子健康记录使用时间进行基准评估。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Aug 1;7(8):e2427389. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.27389.
3
Using event logs to observe interactions with electronic health records: an updated scoping review shows increasing use of vendor-derived measures.
利用事件日志观察与电子健康记录的交互:更新的范围综述显示,越来越多地使用供应商提供的指标。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Dec 13;30(1):144-154. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac177.
4
Otolaryngology resident clinic participation and attending electronic health record efficiency-A user activity logs study.耳鼻喉科住院医师门诊参与情况及主治医生电子健康记录效率——一项用户活动日志研究
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2021 Aug 28;6(5):968-974. doi: 10.1002/lio2.648. eCollection 2021 Oct.
5
Interaction Time with Electronic Health Records: A Systematic Review.与电子健康记录的交互时间:系统评价。
Appl Clin Inform. 2021 Aug;12(4):788-799. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1733909. Epub 2021 Aug 25.