• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

A multicenter comparative study of cefotetan once daily and cefoxitin thrice daily for the treatment of infections of the skin and superficial soft tissue.

作者信息

Geckler R W, Eng R H, Fabian T C, Echols R M, Jemsek J G, LeFrock J L, Mogabgab W C, Wilson S E

机构信息

Division of Infectious Diseases, Mercy Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland 21202.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 1988 May 31;155(5A):91-5. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(88)80221-6.

DOI:10.1016/s0002-9610(88)80221-6
PMID:3287976
Abstract

To compare the effectiveness of cefotetan administered at 2 g once a day with cefoxitin at 1 or 2 g three times a day in the treatment of hospitalized patients with skin and superficial soft tissue infections, 194 patients from eight centers were enrolled in an open, randomized trial. Most of the 104 evaluable patients in the cefotetan group and 50 in the cefoxitin group were young men with community-acquired, moderate or severe cellulitis, or abscesses of the upper and lower extremities caused by Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus species, Escherichia coli, Proteus mirabilis, Bacteroides fragilis and other species of bacteroides, peptococcus species, and peptostreptococcus species. The mean duration of treatment was 7.5 days for cefotetan and 7.1 days for cefoxitin. A successful clinical response was achieved in 97 percent of the cefotetan patients and in 94 percent of the cefoxitin patients. Of the 88 and 39 bacteriologically evaluable patients in the cefotetan and cefoxitin groups, respectively, a satisfactory bacteriologic response occurred in 96 percent and 87 percent of the patients. No clinically significant changes in clinical laboratory determinations were noted. The incidence of adverse reactions in the cefotetan group (17 percent) was significantly different from that for the cefoxitin group (6 percent) (p less than 0.05); however, the incidence of treatment-related reactions was not significant and the events were mild. Discontinuation of therapy was necessary only in two patients in whom allergic-type reactions developed. A once-daily regimen of cefotetan was as effective as thrice-daily cefoxitin in this study in the treatment of primarily polymicrobial, moderate, or severe infections of the skin and superficial soft tissue.

摘要

相似文献

1
A multicenter comparative study of cefotetan once daily and cefoxitin thrice daily for the treatment of infections of the skin and superficial soft tissue.
Am J Surg. 1988 May 31;155(5A):91-5. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(88)80221-6.
2
Comparative study of cefotetan and cefoxitin in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988 Mar;158(3 Pt 2):728-35. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(16)44536-9.
3
Single-dose cefotetan versus multiple-dose cefoxitin as prophylaxis in colorectal surgery.单剂量头孢替坦与多剂量头孢西丁用于结直肠手术预防感染的比较
Am J Surg. 1988 May 31;155(5A):71-6. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(88)80217-4.
4
Results of a multicenter comparative study of single-dose cefotetan and multiple-dose cefoxitin as prophylaxis in patients undergoing cesarean section.
Am J Surg. 1988 May 31;155(5A):86-90. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(88)80220-4.
5
Comparative effectiveness and safety of cefotetan and cefoxitin as prophylactic agents in patients undergoing abdominal or vaginal hysterectomy.头孢替坦和头孢西丁作为腹部或阴道子宫切除术患者预防用药的有效性和安全性比较
Am J Surg. 1988 May 31;155(5A):81-5. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(88)80219-8.
6
Multicenter clinical trials comparing cefotetan with moxalactam or cefoxitin as therapy for obstetric and gynecologic infections.
Am J Surg. 1988 May 31;155(5A):56-60. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(88)80214-9.
7
Multicenter comparison of cefotetan and cefoxitin in the treatment of acute obstetric and gynecologic infections.头孢替坦与头孢西丁治疗急性妇产科感染的多中心比较
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988 Mar;158(3 Pt 2):722-7. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(16)44535-7.
8
Results of a randomized, multicenter, comparative trial of a single dose of cefotetan versus multiple doses of cefoxitin as prophylaxis in cesarean section.单剂量头孢替坦与多剂量头孢西丁用于剖宫产预防的随机、多中心、对照试验结果
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988 Mar;158(3 Pt 2):701-6. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(16)44530-8.
9
Multicenter open trial of cefotetan and cefoxitin in elective biliary surgery.
Am J Surg. 1988 May 31;155(5A):77-80. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(88)80218-6.
10
Intramuscular cefoxitin.
Rev Infect Dis. 1979 Jan-Feb;1(1):224-7. doi: 10.1093/clinids/1.1.224.

引用本文的文献

1
Interventions for cellulitis and erysipelas.蜂窝织炎和丹毒的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jun 16;2010(6):CD004299. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004299.pub2.
2
Review of the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and clinical use of cephalosporins.头孢菌素类药物的药理学、药代动力学及临床应用综述。
Tex Heart Inst J. 1990;17(3):203-15.
3
Risk factors leading to clinical failure in the treatment of intra-abdominal or skin/soft tissue infections.导致腹腔内或皮肤/软组织感染治疗临床失败的危险因素。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1996 Dec;15(12):913-21. doi: 10.1007/BF01690508.