• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单剂量头孢替坦与多剂量头孢西丁用于结直肠手术预防感染的比较

Single-dose cefotetan versus multiple-dose cefoxitin as prophylaxis in colorectal surgery.

作者信息

Jagelman D G, Fabian T C, Nichols R L, Stone H H, Wilson S E, Zellner S R

机构信息

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Fort Lauderdale, 33309.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 1988 May 31;155(5A):71-6. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(88)80217-4.

DOI:10.1016/s0002-9610(88)80217-4
PMID:3287972
Abstract

The safety and effectiveness of a single 2 g preoperative dose of cefotetan to reduce postoperative infectious complications after colorectal surgery was compared with multiple 2 g perioperative doses of cefoxitin in 289 patients enrolled in a multicenter trial; of the 239 evaluable patients, 164 received cefotetan and 75, cefoxitin. No statistically significant difference was detected in the successful clinical response rates for cefotetan and cefoxitin (88 percent and 92 percent, respectively). The difference in median increase in oral body temperature before and after the study (2.5 degrees F for cefotetan and 2 degrees F for cefoxitin) was statistically but not clinically significant (p = 0.03). Although nearly four times as many cefotetan patients as cefoxitin patients had surgery lasting 4 hours or more, the satisfactory bacteriologic response rates for cefotetan and cefoxitin were similar (88 percent and 93 percent, respectively). Nonobese patients and patients whose surgical procedures lasted less than 4 hours treated with either drug had significantly higher success rates (p less than 0.01). The incidence of major wound infection was approximately 8 percent for both treatment groups. Mean concentrations of cefotetan in plasma, specimens of colon, and subcutaneous fat were 128 +/- 61.8 micrograms/ml, 57.2 +/- 40.4 micrograms/g, and 26.8 +/- 19.4 micrograms/g, respectively. The incidence of adverse reactions was 12 percent for each group, and no reaction was considered treatment-related, including changes in results of clinical laboratory tests. A single 2 g preoperative dose of cefotetan was as safe and effective as multiple doses of cefoxitin in the reduction of postoperative wound infections after colorectal surgery.

摘要

在一项多中心试验的289例患者中,比较了术前单次给予2克头孢替坦与围手术期多次给予2克头孢西丁预防结直肠手术后感染并发症的安全性和有效性;在239例可评估患者中,164例接受头孢替坦治疗,75例接受头孢西丁治疗。头孢替坦和头孢西丁的临床有效率无统计学显著差异(分别为88%和92%)。研究前后口腔体温升高的中位数差异(头孢替坦为2.5华氏度,头孢西丁为2华氏度)有统计学意义,但无临床意义(p = 0.03)。虽然接受头孢替坦治疗的患者手术时间持续4小时或更长时间的人数几乎是接受头孢西丁治疗患者的四倍,但头孢替坦和头孢西丁的细菌学有效率相似(分别为88%和93%)。接受任何一种药物治疗的非肥胖患者和手术时间持续少于4小时的患者成功率显著更高(p < 0.01)。两个治疗组的主要伤口感染发生率约为8%。头孢替坦在血浆、结肠标本和皮下脂肪中的平均浓度分别为128±61.8微克/毫升、57.2±40.4微克/克和26.8±19.4微克/克。每组的不良反应发生率均为12%,且无反应被认为与治疗相关,包括临床实验室检查结果的变化。术前单次给予2克头孢替坦在降低结直肠手术后伤口感染方面与多次给予头孢西丁一样安全有效。

相似文献

1
Single-dose cefotetan versus multiple-dose cefoxitin as prophylaxis in colorectal surgery.单剂量头孢替坦与多剂量头孢西丁用于结直肠手术预防感染的比较
Am J Surg. 1988 May 31;155(5A):71-6. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(88)80217-4.
2
Results of a multicenter comparative study of single-dose cefotetan and multiple-dose cefoxitin as prophylaxis in patients undergoing cesarean section.
Am J Surg. 1988 May 31;155(5A):86-90. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(88)80220-4.
3
Comparative effectiveness and safety of cefotetan and cefoxitin as prophylactic agents in patients undergoing abdominal or vaginal hysterectomy.头孢替坦和头孢西丁作为腹部或阴道子宫切除术患者预防用药的有效性和安全性比较
Am J Surg. 1988 May 31;155(5A):81-5. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(88)80219-8.
4
Multicenter open trial of cefotetan and cefoxitin in elective biliary surgery.
Am J Surg. 1988 May 31;155(5A):77-80. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(88)80218-6.
5
Single-dose cefotetan vs. multiple-dose cefoxitin--antimicrobial prophylaxis in colorectal surgery. Results of a prospective, multicenter, randomized study.单剂量头孢替坦与多剂量头孢西丁——结直肠手术中的抗菌预防。一项前瞻性、多中心、随机研究的结果。
Dis Colon Rectum. 1989 Feb;32(2):121-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02553824.
6
Results of a randomized, multicenter, comparative trial of a single dose of cefotetan versus multiple doses of cefoxitin as prophylaxis in cesarean section.单剂量头孢替坦与多剂量头孢西丁用于剖宫产预防的随机、多中心、对照试验结果
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988 Mar;158(3 Pt 2):701-6. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(16)44530-8.
7
Comparative pharmacokinetics of cefotetan and cefoxitin in patients undergoing hysterectomies and colorectal operations.
Am J Surg. 1988 May 31;155(5A):67-70. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(88)80216-2.
8
Cefotetan versus cefoxitin as prophylaxis in hysterectomy.头孢替坦与头孢西丁用于子宫切除术预防感染的比较
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986 Apr;154(4):960-3. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(86)90498-9.
9
A multicenter comparative study of cefotetan once daily and cefoxitin thrice daily for the treatment of infections of the skin and superficial soft tissue.
Am J Surg. 1988 May 31;155(5A):91-5. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(88)80221-6.
10
Comparison of cefotetan and cefoxitin as prophylaxis in cesarean section.头孢替坦与头孢西丁在剖宫产术中预防性应用的比较。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986 Apr;154(4):951-4. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(86)90496-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Antibiotics for preventing infection at the surgical site: Single dose vs. multiple doses.用于预防手术部位感染的抗生素:单剂量与多剂量
Saudi Pharm J. 2023 Dec;31(12):101800. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2023.101800. Epub 2023 Sep 26.
2
Risk adjustment performance between NNIS index and NHSN model for postoperative colorectal surgical site infection: A retrospective cohort study.NNIS指数与NHSN模型在结直肠手术后手术部位感染风险调整方面的表现:一项回顾性队列研究。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022 May 7;77:103715. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103715. eCollection 2022 May.
3
Antimicrobial prophylaxis for colorectal surgery.
结直肠手术的抗菌预防
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 May 9;2014(5):CD001181. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001181.pub4.
4
Serum in vivo and in vitro activity of single dose of ertapenem in surgical obese patients for prevention of SSIs.单剂量厄他培南对手术肥胖患者预防 SSIs 的体内和体外血清活性。
Obes Surg. 2013 Jul;23(7):911-9. doi: 10.1007/s11695-013-0879-1.
5
Implementing a standard protocol to decrease the incidence of surgical site infections in rectal cancer surgery.实施标准方案以降低直肠癌手术部位感染发生率。
Surg Today. 2010 Apr;40(4):326-33. doi: 10.1007/s00595-008-4075-1. Epub 2010 Mar 26.
6
Antimicrobial prophylaxis in colorectal surgery: focus on ertapenem.结直肠手术中的抗菌预防:重点关注厄他培南。
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2009;5:829-39. doi: 10.2147/tcrm.s3101. Epub 2009 Nov 2.
7
Anti-anaerobic antimicrobial agents: cefoxitin, cefotetan, clindamycin, and metronidazole.抗厌氧抗菌药物:头孢西丁、头孢替坦、克林霉素和甲硝唑。
Tex Heart Inst J. 1990;17(2):77-85.
8
Review of the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and clinical use of cephalosporins.头孢菌素类药物的药理学、药代动力学及临床应用综述。
Tex Heart Inst J. 1990;17(3):203-15.
9
Wound infection after elective colorectal resection.择期结直肠切除术后伤口感染
Ann Surg. 2004 May;239(5):599-605; discussion 605-7. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000124292.21605.99.
10
Risk factors for surgical site infection after elective resection of the colon and rectum: a single-center prospective study of 2,809 consecutive patients.择期结肠和直肠切除术后手术部位感染的危险因素:对2809例连续患者的单中心前瞻性研究
Ann Surg. 2001 Aug;234(2):181-9. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200108000-00007.