Suppr超能文献

标准化肺静脉隔离工作流程以连续病灶包绕静脉:多中心 VISTAX 试验。

Standardized pulmonary vein isolation workflow to enclose veins with contiguous lesions: the multicentre VISTAX trial.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, AZ Sint-Jan Hospital, Bruges, Belgium.

Division of Electrophysiology, Hasselt Heart Center, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium.

出版信息

Europace. 2020 Nov 1;22(11):1645-1652. doi: 10.1093/europace/euaa157.

Abstract

AIMS

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of pulmonary vein isolation in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) using a standardized workflow aiming to enclose the veins with contiguous and optimized radiofrequency lesions.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This multicentre, prospective, non-randomized study was conducted at 17 European sites. Pulmonary vein isolation was guided by VISITAG SURPOINT (VS target ≥550 on the anterior wall; ≥400 on the posterior wall) and intertag distance (≤6 mm). Atrial arrhythmia recurrence was stringently monitored with weekly and symptom-driven transtelephonic monitoring on top of standard-of-care monitoring (24-h Holter and 12-lead electrocardiogram at 3, 6, and 12 months follow-up). Three hundred and forty participants with drug refractory PAF were enrolled. Acute effectiveness (first-pass isolation proof to a 30-min wait period and adenosine challenge) was 82.4% [95% confidence interval (CI) 77.4-86.7%]. At 12-month follow-up, the rate of freedom from any documented atrial arrhythmia was 78.3% (95% CI 73.8-82.8%), while freedom from atrial arrhythmia by standard-of-care monitoring was 89.4% (95% CI 78.8-87.0%). Freedom fromrepeat ablations by the Kaplan-Meier analysis was 90.4% during 12 months of follow-up. Of the 34 patients with repeat ablations, 14 (41.2%) demonstrated full isolation of all pulmonary vein circles. Primary adverse event (PAE) rate was 3.6% (95% CI 1.9-6.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

The VISTAX trial demonstrated that a standardized PAF ablation workflow aiming for contiguous lesions leads to low rates of PAEs, high acute first-pass isolation rates, and 12-month freedom from arrhythmias approaching 80%. Further research is needed to improve the reproducibility of the outcomes across a wider range of centres.Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03062046, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03062046.

摘要

目的

评估使用标准化工作流程进行阵发性心房颤动(PAF)肺静脉隔离的安全性和有效性,该流程旨在通过连续且优化的射频消融来封闭静脉。

方法和结果

这项多中心、前瞻性、非随机研究在欧洲的 17 个地点进行。肺静脉隔离由 VISITAG SURPOINT(前壁 VS 目标≥550;后壁≥400)和相间距离(≤6mm)指导。在标准护理监测(24 小时动态心电图和 12 导联心电图在 3、6 和 12 个月随访时)的基础上,每周和症状驱动的远程电话监测严格监测心房心律失常复发。纳入了 340 例药物难治性 PAF 患者。急性有效性(首次通过隔离证明在 30 分钟等待期和腺苷挑战)为 82.4%(95%置信区间[CI] 77.4-86.7%)。在 12 个月随访时,任何有记录的心房心律失常无复发率为 78.3%(95%CI 73.8-82.8%),而标准护理监测的无心律失常率为 89.4%(95%CI 78.8-87.0%)。根据 Kaplan-Meier 分析,在 12 个月的随访中,重复消融的无复发率为 90.4%。在 34 例重复消融的患者中,14 例(41.2%)显示所有肺静脉环的完全隔离。主要不良事件(PAE)发生率为 3.6%(95%CI 1.9-6.3%)。

结论

VISTAX 试验表明,针对连续病变的标准化 PAF 消融工作流程可导致 PAE 发生率低、急性首次通过隔离率高,并且 12 个月的心律失常无复发率接近 80%。需要进一步研究以提高更广泛中心的结果的可重复性。临床试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov,编号 NCT03062046,https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03062046。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验