• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

糖皮质激素注射、体外冲击波治疗和射频热疗治疗慢性足底筋膜炎的结果。

Outcome of Corticosteroid Injections, Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy, and Radiofrequency Thermal Lesioning for Chronic Plantar Fasciitis.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Acıbadem Fulya Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Istanbul Kartal Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Foot Ankle Int. 2021 Jan;42(1):69-75. doi: 10.1177/1071100720949469. Epub 2020 Sep 3.

DOI:10.1177/1071100720949469
PMID:32880199
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chronic heel pain with plantar fasciitis is relatively common and can affect adults of all ages regardless of an active or sedentary lifestyle. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of corticosteroid injection (CSI), extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), and radiofrequency thermal lesioning (RTL) treatments in chronic plantar heel pain that has been unresponsive to other conservative treatments.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the results of 217 patients treated with CSI ( = 73), ESWT ( = 75), and RTL ( = 69). The treatment efficacy and pain intensity, as measured using the visual analog scale, were recorded and compared at the 6-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Pain intensity decreased significantly in all patients. However, it decreased significantly more in the CSI and RTL groups than in the ESWT group ( < .001). Age, sex, body mass index, calcaneal spur presence, and symptom duration were similar among 3 groups ( > .05). No complications were noted after the CSI, ESWT, or RTL sessions.

CONCLUSION

CSI, ESWT, and RTL successfully treated chronic plantar heel pain that did not respond to other conservative treatments; however, CSI and RTL yielded better therapeutic outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

摘要

背景

足底筋膜炎引起的慢性足跟疼痛较为常见,无论生活方式是活跃还是久坐,各年龄段的成年人都可能受到影响。本研究的目的是评估在对其他保守治疗无反应的慢性足底足跟疼痛患者中,皮质类固醇注射(CSI)、体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)和射频热疗(RTL)治疗的有效性。

方法

我们回顾性分析了 217 名接受 CSI(n = 73)、ESWT(n = 75)和 RTL(n = 69)治疗的患者的结果。在 6 个月的随访中记录并比较了治疗效果和疼痛强度(使用视觉模拟评分法测量)。

结果

所有患者的疼痛强度均显著降低。然而,CSI 和 RTL 组的疼痛强度降低明显大于 ESWT 组(<0.001)。3 组之间的年龄、性别、体重指数、跟骨骨刺存在情况和症状持续时间相似(>0.05)。CSI、ESWT 或 RTL 治疗后均未出现并发症。

结论

CSI、ESWT 和 RTL 成功治疗了对其他保守治疗无反应的慢性足底足跟疼痛,但 CSI 和 RTL 产生了更好的治疗效果。

证据等级

III 级,回顾性比较研究。

相似文献

1
Outcome of Corticosteroid Injections, Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy, and Radiofrequency Thermal Lesioning for Chronic Plantar Fasciitis.糖皮质激素注射、体外冲击波治疗和射频热疗治疗慢性足底筋膜炎的结果。
Foot Ankle Int. 2021 Jan;42(1):69-75. doi: 10.1177/1071100720949469. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
2
Which Treatment Method Is Better in the Treatment of Chronic Plantar Fasciitis: Corticosteroid Injection, Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy, or Radiofrequency Thermal Lesioning?哪种治疗方法在治疗慢性足底筋膜炎方面更好:皮质类固醇注射、体外冲击波疗法还是射频热疗?
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2023 Sep-Oct;113(5). doi: 10.7547/21-049.
3
Clinical effects of extracorporeal shock-wave therapy and ultrasound-guided local corticosteroid injections for plantar fasciitis in adults: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.体外冲击波疗法与超声引导下局部注射皮质类固醇激素治疗成人足底筋膜炎的临床效果:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Dec;97(50):e13687. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013687.
4
Treatment Outcomes of Corticosteroid Injection and Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy as Two Primary Therapeutic Methods for Acute Plantar Fasciitis: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial.皮质类固醇注射和体外冲击波疗法作为急性足底筋膜炎两种主要治疗方法的治疗结果:一项前瞻性随机临床试验
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2015 Nov-Dec;54(6):1047-52. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2015.04.026. Epub 2015 Jul 26.
5
Ultrasonography and clinical outcome comparison of extracorporeal shock wave therapy and corticosteroid injections for chronic plantar fasciitis: A randomized controlled trial.体外冲击波疗法与皮质类固醇注射治疗慢性足底筋膜炎的超声检查与临床结果比较:一项随机对照试验
J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2018 Mar 1;18(1):47-54.
6
Extracorporeal shock wave therapy versus corticosteroid injection for chronic plantar fasciitis: A protocol of randomized controlled trial.体外冲击波疗法与皮质类固醇注射治疗慢性足底筋膜炎:一项随机对照试验方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 May;99(19):e19920. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019920.
7
Extra Corporeal Shock Wave Therapy Versus Local Corticosteroid Injection in the Treatment of Chronic Plantar Fasciitis, a Single Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial.体外冲击波疗法与局部注射皮质类固醇治疗慢性足底筋膜炎的单盲随机临床试验
Pain Med. 2016 Sep;17(9):1722-31. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnw113. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
8
Effectiveness of Four Different Treatment Modalities in the Treatment of Chronic Plantar Fasciitis During a 36-Month Follow-Up Period: A Randomized Controlled Trial.四种不同治疗方式在36个月随访期内治疗慢性足底筋膜炎的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2018 Sep-Oct;57(5):913-918. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2018.03.017.
9
Radiofrequency Thermal Lesioning and Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy: A Comparison of Two Methods in the Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis.射频热凝术与体外冲击波疗法:两种治疗足底筋膜炎方法的比较
Foot Ankle Spec. 2017 Jun;10(3):204-209. doi: 10.1177/1938640016675408. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
10
Intralesional corticosteroid injection versus extracorporeal shock wave therapy for plantar fasciopathy.病灶内注射皮质类固醇与体外冲击波疗法治疗足底筋膜炎的比较。
Clin J Sport Med. 2005 May;15(3):119-24. doi: 10.1097/01.jsm.0000164039.91787.dc.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Effectiveness of Ultrasound-Guided Corticosteroid Injection, Radiofrequency Ablation, and Their Combination for Recalcitrant Plantar Fasciitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.超声引导下皮质类固醇注射、射频消融及其联合治疗顽固性足底筋膜炎的比较疗效:一项回顾性队列研究
J Foot Ankle Res. 2025 Sep;18(3):e70080. doi: 10.1002/jfa2.70080.
2
The efficacy of ultrasound for plantar fasciitis, a systematic review and meta-analysis.超声治疗足底筋膜炎的疗效:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Ann Med. 2025 Dec;57(1):2543056. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2025.2543056. Epub 2025 Aug 10.
3
Efficacy of Radiofrequency by the Topaz Technique for Chronic Plantar Fasciopathy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
黄玉技术射频治疗慢性足底筋膜炎的疗效:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 20;14(8):2843. doi: 10.3390/jcm14082843.
4
Effect of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound on postoperative rehabilitation of rotator cuff tears: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.低强度脉冲超声波对肩袖撕裂术后康复的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 15;19(8):e0308354. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308354. eCollection 2024.
5
A Novel Combination Strategy of Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation and Corticosteroid Injection for Treating Recalcitrant Plantar Fasciitis: A Retrospective Comparison Study.超声引导下经皮射频消融与皮质类固醇注射联合治疗顽固性足底筋膜炎的新策略:一项回顾性比较研究
Pain Ther. 2024 Oct;13(5):1137-1149. doi: 10.1007/s40122-024-00629-y. Epub 2024 Jul 3.
6
Pain relief and functional improvement provided by extracorporeal shock wave therapy in plantar fasciitis is better than corticosteroid injection and kinesio taping: A randomized trial.体外冲击波疗法对足底筋膜炎的疼痛缓解和功能改善效果优于皮质类固醇注射和肌内效贴布:一项随机试验。
Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2023 Aug 23;69(4):469-478. doi: 10.5606/tftrd.2023.12824. eCollection 2023 Dec.
7
Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis in Patients with Calcaneal Spurs: Radiofrequency Thermal Ablation or Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy?跟骨骨刺患者足底筋膜炎的治疗:射频热消融还是体外冲击波疗法?
J Clin Med. 2023 Oct 13;12(20):6503. doi: 10.3390/jcm12206503.
8
Artificial Intelligence Technology Combined with Ultrasound-Guided Needle Knife Interventional Treatment of PF: Improvement of Pain, Fascia Thickness, and Ankle-Foot Function in Patients.人工智能技术联合超声引导针刀介入治疗膝骨关节炎:改善患者疼痛、筋膜厚度和踝足功能。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 May 17;2022:3021320. doi: 10.1155/2022/3021320. eCollection 2022.
9
Effects of intralesional pulsed radiofrequency treatment on pain in patients with calcaneal spur: results of 460 patients.经皮脉冲射频治疗跟骨骨刺患者疼痛的疗效:460 例患者的结果。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Dec 10;22(1):1033. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04926-x.