Department of Psychology, Universität Siegen.
Department of Psychology, HumboldtUniversität zu Berlin.
Psychol Aging. 2020 Nov;35(7):1000-1015. doi: 10.1037/pag0000573. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
People differ from each other in their typical patterns of behavior, thought, and emotion and these patterns are considered to constitute their personalities (Funder, 2001). For various reasons, for example, because certain trait levels may help to attain certain goals or fulfill certain social roles, people may experience that their actual trait levels are different from their ideal trait levels. In this study, we investigated (a) the impact of age on discrepancies between actual and ideal Big Five personality trait levels and (b) the impact of these discrepancies on personality trait changes across a period of 2 years. We use data of a large, nationally representative, and age-diverse sample (N = 4,057, 17-94 years, M = 53 years). Results largely confirmed previously reported age effects on actual personality trait levels but were sometimes more complex. Ideal trait levels exceeded actual trait levels more strongly for younger compared with older adults. Unexpectedly, neither ideal trait levels nor their interaction with beliefs about the extent to which personality is malleable versus fixed predicted trait change over 2 years (controlling for actual trait levels). We conclude that ideal-actual trait level discrepancies may provide an impetus for change but that they appear to neither alone nor in combination with the belief that personality trait change is possible suffice to produce such change. We discuss commitment, self-efficacy, and strategy knowledge as potential additional predictors of trait change. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
人们在行为、思维和情感方面的典型模式存在差异,这些模式被认为构成了他们的个性(Funder,2001)。由于各种原因,例如,某些特质水平可能有助于实现某些目标或履行某些社会角色,人们可能会体验到他们的实际特质水平与理想特质水平不同。在这项研究中,我们调查了(a)年龄对实际和理想大五人格特质水平差异的影响,以及(b)这些差异对两年期间人格特质变化的影响。我们使用了一个大型的、具有全国代表性的、年龄多样化的样本(N=4057,17-94 岁,M=53 岁)的数据。结果在很大程度上证实了先前报告的年龄对实际人格特质水平的影响,但有时更为复杂。与老年人相比,年轻人的理想特质水平比实际特质水平更高。出乎意料的是,无论是理想特质水平还是它们与信念的相互作用,即人格是可塑的还是固定的程度,都不能预测两年内的特质变化(控制实际特质水平)。我们的结论是,理想-实际特质水平差异可能为变化提供动力,但似乎既不能单独,也不能与人格特质变化是可能的信念相结合,足以产生这种变化。我们讨论了承诺、自我效能和策略知识作为特质变化的潜在额外预测因素。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2020 APA,保留所有权利)。