• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实际-理想人格特质水平差异的年龄相关差异。

Age-related differences in actual-ideal personality trait level discrepancies.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Universität Siegen.

Department of Psychology, HumboldtUniversität zu Berlin.

出版信息

Psychol Aging. 2020 Nov;35(7):1000-1015. doi: 10.1037/pag0000573. Epub 2020 Sep 3.

DOI:10.1037/pag0000573
PMID:32881547
Abstract

People differ from each other in their typical patterns of behavior, thought, and emotion and these patterns are considered to constitute their personalities (Funder, 2001). For various reasons, for example, because certain trait levels may help to attain certain goals or fulfill certain social roles, people may experience that their actual trait levels are different from their ideal trait levels. In this study, we investigated (a) the impact of age on discrepancies between actual and ideal Big Five personality trait levels and (b) the impact of these discrepancies on personality trait changes across a period of 2 years. We use data of a large, nationally representative, and age-diverse sample (N = 4,057, 17-94 years, M = 53 years). Results largely confirmed previously reported age effects on actual personality trait levels but were sometimes more complex. Ideal trait levels exceeded actual trait levels more strongly for younger compared with older adults. Unexpectedly, neither ideal trait levels nor their interaction with beliefs about the extent to which personality is malleable versus fixed predicted trait change over 2 years (controlling for actual trait levels). We conclude that ideal-actual trait level discrepancies may provide an impetus for change but that they appear to neither alone nor in combination with the belief that personality trait change is possible suffice to produce such change. We discuss commitment, self-efficacy, and strategy knowledge as potential additional predictors of trait change. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

人们在行为、思维和情感方面的典型模式存在差异,这些模式被认为构成了他们的个性(Funder,2001)。由于各种原因,例如,某些特质水平可能有助于实现某些目标或履行某些社会角色,人们可能会体验到他们的实际特质水平与理想特质水平不同。在这项研究中,我们调查了(a)年龄对实际和理想大五人格特质水平差异的影响,以及(b)这些差异对两年期间人格特质变化的影响。我们使用了一个大型的、具有全国代表性的、年龄多样化的样本(N=4057,17-94 岁,M=53 岁)的数据。结果在很大程度上证实了先前报告的年龄对实际人格特质水平的影响,但有时更为复杂。与老年人相比,年轻人的理想特质水平比实际特质水平更高。出乎意料的是,无论是理想特质水平还是它们与信念的相互作用,即人格是可塑的还是固定的程度,都不能预测两年内的特质变化(控制实际特质水平)。我们的结论是,理想-实际特质水平差异可能为变化提供动力,但似乎既不能单独,也不能与人格特质变化是可能的信念相结合,足以产生这种变化。我们讨论了承诺、自我效能和策略知识作为特质变化的潜在额外预测因素。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2020 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
Age-related differences in actual-ideal personality trait level discrepancies.实际-理想人格特质水平差异的年龄相关差异。
Psychol Aging. 2020 Nov;35(7):1000-1015. doi: 10.1037/pag0000573. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
2
Volitional personality trait change: Can people choose to change their personality traits?意志人格特质改变:人们可以选择改变自己的人格特质吗?
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015 Sep;109(3):490-507. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000021. Epub 2015 Mar 30.
3
Sixteen going on sixty-six: A longitudinal study of personality stability and change across 50 years.从十六岁到六十六岁:跨越五十年的人格稳定性和变化的纵向研究。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2019 Sep;117(3):674-695. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000210. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
4
Age and context effects in personality development: A multimethod perspective.人格发展中的年龄与情境效应:多方法视角
Psychol Aging. 2023 Feb;38(1):1-16. doi: 10.1037/pag0000705. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
5
You have to follow through: Attaining behavioral change goals predicts volitional personality change.你必须坚持下去:实现行为改变目标可以预测意志人格改变。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2019 Oct;117(4):839-857. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000221. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
6
Does personality become more stable with age? Disentangling state and trait effects for the big five across the life span using local structural equation modeling.人格随着年龄的增长会变得更加稳定吗?使用局部结构方程模型在整个生命周期中对五大特质进行状态和特质效应的分解。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2019 Apr;116(4):666-680. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000203. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
7
The experience of benefit and impairment of personality disorder traits and personality disorder trait attitudes.人格障碍特征和人格障碍特征态度的获益和损害体验。
Personal Disord. 2019 Sep;10(5):448-455. doi: 10.1037/per0000339. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
8
The longitudinal links of personality traits, values, and well-being and self-esteem: A five-wave study of a nationally representative sample.人格特质、价值观、幸福感和自尊的纵向联系:一项全国代表性样本的五波研究。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2019 Aug;117(2):448-464. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000212. Epub 2018 Nov 5.
9
Personality disorder traits: Perceptions of likability, impairment, and ability to change as correlates and moderators of desired level.人格障碍特征:可喜爱性、损害和改变能力的感知作为期望水平的相关因素和调节因素。
Personal Disord. 2018 Sep;9(5):478-483. doi: 10.1037/per0000263. Epub 2017 Nov 9.
10
Comparing the validity of trait estimates from the multidimensional forced-choice format and the rating scale format.比较多维迫选格式和评分量表格式的特质估计的有效性。
Psychol Assess. 2020 Mar;32(3):239-253. doi: 10.1037/pas0000781. Epub 2019 Nov 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Refining the maturity principle of personality development by examining facets, close others, and comaturation.通过考察人格发展的各个方面、亲近他人和共同成长来完善成熟原则。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2022 May;122(5):942-958. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000400. Epub 2022 Jan 13.