School of Psychology, The University of Newcastle.
School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne.
Psychol Rev. 2021 Jan;128(1):187-201. doi: 10.1037/rev0000256. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
Systems Factorial Technology (SFT) is a popular framework for that has been used to investigate processing capacity across many psychological domains over the past 25+ years. To date, it had been assumed that no processing resources are used for sources in which no signal has been presented (i.e., in a location that can contain a signal but does not on a given trial). Hence, response times are purely driven by the signal-containing location or locations. This assumption is critical to the underlying mathematics of the capacity coefficient measure of SFT. In this article, we show that stimulus locations influence response times even when they contain no signal, and that this influence has repercussions for the interpretation of processing capacity under the SFT framework, particularly in conjunctive (AND) tasks-where positive responses require detection of signals in multiple locations. We propose a modification to the AND task requiring participants to fully identify both target locations on all trials. This modification allows a new coefficient to be derived. We apply the new coefficient to novel experimental data and resolve a previously reported empirical paradox, where observed capacity was limited in an OR detection task but super capacity in an AND detection task. Hence, previously reported differences in processing capacity between OR and AND task designs are likely to have been spurious. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
系统因素技术(SFT)是一种流行的框架,在过去的 25 年以上的时间里,它被用于研究许多心理领域的处理能力。迄今为止,人们一直认为,对于没有呈现信号的来源(即在给定试验中可以包含信号但实际上没有信号的位置),不会使用任何处理资源。因此,反应时间纯粹由包含信号的位置或位置驱动。这个假设是 SFT 容量系数测量方法的基础数学的关键。在本文中,我们表明,即使刺激位置不包含信号,它们也会影响反应时间,并且这种影响会对 SFT 框架下的处理能力的解释产生影响,特别是在结合(AND)任务中——在这些任务中,阳性反应需要在多个位置检测信号。我们提出了对 AND 任务的修改,要求参与者在所有试验中都完全识别两个目标位置。这种修改允许导出一个新的系数。我们将新系数应用于新的实验数据,并解决了先前报告的经验悖论,即在 OR 检测任务中观察到的容量有限,但在 AND 检测任务中则超过了容量。因此,先前报告的 OR 和 AND 任务设计之间的处理能力差异可能是虚假的。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2020 APA,保留所有权利)。