Suppr超能文献

比较 spectra optia 和 amicus 细胞分离机用于自体外周血造血干细胞采集。

Comparison of spectra optia and amicus cell separators for autologous peripheral blood stem cell collection.

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.

Department of Laboratory Medicine, National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea.

出版信息

J Clin Apher. 2021 Feb;36(1):28-33. doi: 10.1002/jca.21835. Epub 2020 Sep 3.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Autologous peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplantation has become a standard treatment option for many oncology patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of two cell separators, Spectra Optia (Terumo BCT, Japan) and Amicus (Fresenius-Kabi) for autologous PBSC collection.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 56 apheresis by Spectra Optia with Continuous Mononuclear Cell Collection (cMNC) from 20 patients, and 50 apheresis by Amicus from 27 patients between December 2018 and December 2019. CD34+ collection efficiency (CE2) and platelet (PLT) loss were evaluated.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in CD34+ CE2 between Spectra Optia with cMNC (median, 28.8%) and Amicus (median, 33.1%; P = 0.537). PLT loss was significantly lower in Amicus (median, 28.6%) than in Spectra Optia with cMNC (median, 37.8%; P = 0.009).

CONCLUSION

CD34+ CE2 was comparable between Spectra Optia and Amicus, and PLT loss was significantly lower in Amicus. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report comparing autologous PBSC collection of the Spectra Optia and Amicus. These results may provide general guidance with regard to device selection to apheresis clinics that use both separators for optimal outcomes depending on each patient's characteristics.

摘要

简介

自体外周血造血干细胞(PBSC)移植已成为许多肿瘤患者的标准治疗选择。本研究旨在评估两种细胞分离机,Spectra Optia(Terumo BCT,日本)和 Amicus(Fresenius-Kabi),在自体 PBSC 采集方面的性能。

方法

我们回顾性评估了 2018 年 12 月至 2019 年 12 月期间 20 名患者的 56 次 Spectra Optia 连续单核细胞采集(cMNC)和 27 名患者的 50 次 Amicus 采集。评估了 CD34+采集效率(CE2)和血小板(PLT)丢失。

结果

Spectra Optia 与 cMNC(中位数,28.8%)和 Amicus(中位数,33.1%;P = 0.537)之间的 CD34+CE2 无显著差异。Amicus 的 PLT 丢失明显低于 Spectra Optia 与 cMNC(中位数,28.6% vs. 37.8%;P = 0.009)。

结论

Spectra Optia 与 Amicus 之间的 CD34+CE2 相当,Amicus 的 PLT 丢失明显较低。据我们所知,这是首次比较 Spectra Optia 和 Amicus 自体 PBSC 采集的报告。这些结果可能为根据每个患者的特点,为同时使用这两种分离机的采集中心提供设备选择方面的一般指导,以获得最佳结果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验