• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经鼻持续气道正压通气联合肺表面活性物质治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的临床疗效及对血气指标的影响

Introduction of less invasive surfactant administration (LISA), impact on diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in early life: a historical cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Neonatology, Máxima Medical Centre, De Run 4600, 5504 DB, Veldhoven, The Netherlands.

Máxima Medical Centre Academy, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, the Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Pediatr. 2020 Sep 3;20(1):421. doi: 10.1186/s12887-020-02325-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12887-020-02325-0
PMID:32883280
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7470444/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In preterm infants with Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS), Less Invasive Surfactant Administration (LISA) has been established to reduce the need of mechanical ventilation and might improve survival rates without bronchopulmonary dysplasia. The aim of this study was to investigate whether NICU care has changed after introduction of less invasive surfactant administration (LISA), with regard to diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in the first week of life.

METHODS

Infants with gestational age < 32 weeks who received surfactant by LISA (June 2014 - December 2017, n = 169) were retrospectively compared to infants who received surfactant after intubation (January 2012 - May 2014, n = 155). Local protocols on indication for surfactant, early onset sepsis, blood transfusions and enteral feeding did not change between both study periods. Besides, as secondary outcome complications of prematurity were compared. Data was collected from electronic patient files and compared by univariate analysis through Students T-test, Mann Whitney-U test, Pearson Chi-Square test or Linear by Linear Association.

RESULTS

All baseline characteristics of both groups were comparable. Compared to controls, LISA patients received a higher total surfactant dose (208 vs.160 mg/kg; p < 0.001), required redosing more frequently (32.5% vs. 21.3%; p = 0.023), but needed less mechanical ventilation (35.5% vs. 76.8%; p < 0.001). After LISA, infants underwent fewer X-rays (1.0 vs. 3.0, p < 0.001), blood gas examinations (3.0 vs. 5.0, p < 0.001), less inotropic drugs (9.5% vs. 18.1%; p = 0.024), blood transfusions (24.9% vs. 41.9%, p = 0.003) and had shorter duration of antibiotic therapy for suspected early onset sepsis (3.0 vs. 5.0 days, p < 0.001). Moreover, enteral feeding was advanced faster (120 vs. 100 mL/kg/d, p = 0.048) at day seven. There were no differences in complications of prematurity.

CONCLUSION

The introduction of LISA is associated with significantly fewer diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in the first week of life, which emphasizes the beneficial effects of LISA.

摘要

背景

在患有呼吸窘迫综合征(RDS)的早产儿中,已经建立了微创表面活性剂给药(LISA)以减少对机械通气的需求,并且可能在没有支气管肺发育不良的情况下提高存活率。本研究的目的是调查在引入微创表面活性剂给药(LISA)后,新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)的护理是否发生了变化,特别是在生命的第一周内的诊断和治疗程序方面。

方法

回顾性比较了 2014 年 6 月至 2017 年 12 月期间接受 LISA 治疗的胎龄<32 周的婴儿(n=169)和 2012 年 1 月至 2014 年 5 月期间接受气管内插管治疗的婴儿(n=155)。在这两个研究期间,关于表面活性剂、早发性败血症、输血和肠内喂养的局部方案均未改变。此外,还比较了早产儿并发症。数据从电子病历中收集,并通过单变量分析通过学生 t 检验、曼惠特尼 U 检验、皮尔逊卡方检验或线性线性关联进行比较。

结果

两组的所有基线特征均相似。与对照组相比,LISA 患者接受的总表面活性剂剂量更高(208 毫克/千克与 160 毫克/千克;p<0.001),需要更频繁的重新给药(32.5%与 21.3%;p=0.023),但需要的机械通气更少(35.5%与 76.8%;p<0.001)。在 LISA 之后,婴儿接受的 X 光检查次数更少(1.0 次与 3.0 次,p<0.001),血气检查次数更少(3.0 次与 5.0 次,p<0.001),使用的正性肌力药物更少(9.5%与 18.1%;p=0.024),输血更少(24.9%与 41.9%,p=0.003),疑似早发性败血症的抗生素治疗时间更短(3.0 天与 5.0 天,p<0.001)。此外,第七天肠内喂养的速度更快(120 毫升/千克/天与 100 毫升/千克/天,p=0.048)。早产儿并发症无差异。

结论

微创表面活性剂给药(LISA)的引入与生命的第一周内的诊断和治疗程序明显减少有关,这强调了 LISA 的有益效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f3b/7470444/378a02b22c5f/12887_2020_2325_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f3b/7470444/378a02b22c5f/12887_2020_2325_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f3b/7470444/378a02b22c5f/12887_2020_2325_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Introduction of less invasive surfactant administration (LISA), impact on diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in early life: a historical cohort study.经鼻持续气道正压通气联合肺表面活性物质治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的临床疗效及对血气指标的影响
BMC Pediatr. 2020 Sep 3;20(1):421. doi: 10.1186/s12887-020-02325-0.
2
The influence of the technique of surfactant administration (LISA vs INSURE) on the outcomes of respiratory distress syndrome treatment in preterm infants.表面活性剂给药技术(肺内滴注法与气管插管-肺表面活性物质给药法)对早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征治疗结局的影响。
Dev Period Med. 2019;23(3):163-171. doi: 10.34763/devperiodmed.20192303.163171.
3
Less invasive surfactant administration versus endotracheal surfactant instillation followed by limited peak pressure ventilation in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome in China: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.经鼻给予肺表面活性物质与气管内给予肺表面活性物质后行小潮气量通气治疗中国呼吸窘迫综合征早产儿的随机对照试验研究方案
Trials. 2020 Jun 11;21(1):516. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04390-3.
4
Effects of less invasive surfactant administration versus intubation-surfactant-extubation on bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a single-center, retrospective study from China.经鼻持续气道正压通气与肺表面活性物质联合鼻塞式气道正压通气治疗早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征的临床疗效比较 目的:探讨经鼻持续气道正压通气(NCPAP)与肺表面活性物质(PS)联合鼻塞式气道正压通气(CPAP)治疗早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征(NRDS)的临床疗效。方法:选择 2019 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月在我院接受治疗的 86 例 NRDS 早产儿作为研究对象,按照随机数字表法分为观察组和对照组,每组 43 例。观察组给予 NCPAP 联合 PS 治疗,对照组给予 CPAP 联合 PS 治疗。比较两组患儿的临床疗效、血气指标、机械通气时间、住院时间及不良反应发生情况。结果:观察组患儿的总有效率为 95.35%,明显高于对照组的 76.74%(P<0.05)。治疗后,观察组患儿的 PaO2、SaO2 水平明显高于对照组,PaCO2 水平明显低于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组患儿的机械通气时间和住院时间明显短于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组患儿的不良反应总发生率为 4.65%,明显低于对照组的 18.60%(P<0.05)。结论:NCPAP 联合 PS 治疗 NRDS 早产儿的临床疗效优于 CPAP 联合 PS 治疗,能有效改善血气指标,缩短机械通气时间和住院时间,降低不良反应发生率。
BMC Pulm Med. 2022 Dec 5;22(1):462. doi: 10.1186/s12890-022-02270-x.
5
Less Invasive Surfactant Administration in Preterm Infants with Respiratory Distress Syndrome.在患有呼吸窘迫综合征的早产儿中进行的微创表面活性剂给药
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2019 Mar;29(3):226-330. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2019.03.226.
6
Three-year perinatal outcomes of less invasive beractant administration in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome.早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征患者中应用 less invasive beractant 治疗的 3 年围产期结局。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Aug;33(16):2704-2710. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1557633. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
7
Observational Study on Less Invasive Surfactant Administration (LISA) in Preterm Infants<29 Weeks--Short and Long-term Outcomes.29周以下早产儿微创表面活性剂给药(LISA)的观察性研究——短期和长期结果
Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol. 2015 Dec;219(6):266-73. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1547295. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
8
Less Invasive Surfactant Administration (LISA) vs. Intubation Surfactant Extubation (InSurE) in Preterm Infants with Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.经鼻持续气道正压通气与肺表面活性物质治疗早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征的随机对照研究
J Trop Pediatr. 2021 Aug 27;67(4). doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmab086.
9
Surfactant administration methods for premature newborns: LISA vs. INSURE comparative analysis.表面活性物质给药方法用于早产儿:LISA 与 INSURE 比较分析。
J Neonatal Perinatal Med. 2024;17(2):233-239. doi: 10.3233/NPM-230194.
10
Less invasive surfactant administration via infant feeding tube versus InSurE method in preterm infants: a randomized control trial.经婴儿喂养管给予微创表面活性剂与 InSurE 方法在早产儿中的应用:一项随机对照试验。
Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 19;12(1):21955. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-23557-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevention of Chronic Morbidities in Extremely Premature Newborns with LISA-nCPAP Respiratory Therapy and Adjuvant Perinatal Strategies.采用 LISA-nCPAP 呼吸治疗及辅助围产期策略预防极早早产儿的慢性疾病
Antioxidants (Basel). 2023 May 24;12(6):1149. doi: 10.3390/antiox12061149.
2
RDS-NExT workshop: consensus statements for the use of surfactant in preterm neonates with RDS.RDS-NExT 研讨会:关于早产儿 RDS 使用表面活性剂的共识声明。
J Perinatol. 2023 Aug;43(8):982-990. doi: 10.1038/s41372-023-01690-9. Epub 2023 May 15.
3
Less Invasive Surfactant Administration: A Review of Current Evidence of Clinical Outcomes With Beractant.

本文引用的文献

1
Minimally invasive surfactant therapy failure: risk factors and outcome.微创表面活性剂治疗失败:危险因素和结局。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2019 Nov;104(6):F636-F642. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-316258. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
2
Novel Surfactant Administration Techniques: Will They Change Outcome?新型表面活性剂给药技术:会改变结局吗?
Neonatology. 2019;115(4):411-422. doi: 10.1159/000497328. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
3
European Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Respiratory Distress Syndrome - 2019 Update.欧洲呼吸窘迫综合征管理共识指南-2019 更新版。
微创表面活性剂给药:贝拉克坦临床结局的当前证据综述
Cureus. 2022 Oct 12;14(10):e30223. doi: 10.7759/cureus.30223. eCollection 2022 Oct.
4
Clinical impact of less invasive surfactant administration using video laryngoscopy in extremely preterm infants.经视频喉镜使用微创肺表面活性物质给药对极早产儿的临床影响。
Pediatr Res. 2023 Mar;93(4):990-995. doi: 10.1038/s41390-022-02197-3. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
5
Improved Less Invasive Surfactant Administration Success in Preterm Infants after Procedure Standardization.程序标准化后早产儿微创表面活性剂给药成功率提高
Children (Basel). 2021 Dec 6;8(12):1145. doi: 10.3390/children8121145.
6
Comparison of minimally invasive surfactant therapy with intubation surfactant administration and extubation for treating preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized clinical trial.微创表面活性剂治疗与插管表面活性剂给药及拔管治疗早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征的比较:一项随机临床试验。
Clin Exp Pediatr. 2022 Apr;65(4):188-193. doi: 10.3345/cep.2021.00297. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
Neonatology. 2019;115(4):432-450. doi: 10.1159/000499361. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
4
Risk Factors for Late-Onset Sepsis in Preterm Infants: A Multicenter Case-Control Study.早产儿晚发性败血症的危险因素:一项多中心病例对照研究。
Neonatology. 2019;116(1):42-51. doi: 10.1159/000497781. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
5
Duration of Initial Empirical Antibiotic Therapy and Outcomes in Very Low Birth Weight Infants.初始经验性抗生素治疗持续时间与极低出生体重儿结局的关系。
Pediatrics. 2019 Mar;143(3). doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-2286.
6
Culture-Negative Early-Onset Neonatal Sepsis - At the Crossroad Between Efficient Sepsis Care and Antimicrobial Stewardship.培养阴性早发型新生儿败血症——高效败血症护理与抗菌药物管理的十字路口
Front Pediatr. 2018 Oct 9;6:285. doi: 10.3389/fped.2018.00285. eCollection 2018.
7
Less invasive surfactant administration and complications of preterm birth.经更少侵袭性的表面活性剂给药和早产的并发症。
Sci Rep. 2018 May 29;8(1):8333. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-26437-x.
8
Volume-targeted versus pressure-limited ventilation in neonates.新生儿容量目标通气与压力限制通气的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 17;10(10):CD003666. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003666.pub4.
9
Slow advancement of enteral feed volumes to prevent necrotising enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants.缓慢增加肠内喂养量以预防极低出生体重儿坏死性小肠结肠炎
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 30;8(8):CD001241. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001241.pub7.
10
Less Invasive Surfactant Administration Reduces the Need for Mechanical Ventilation in Preterm Infants: A Meta-Analysis.微创表面活性剂给药减少早产儿机械通气需求:一项荟萃分析。
Glob Pediatr Health. 2017 Mar 24;4:2333794X17696683. doi: 10.1177/2333794X17696683. eCollection 2017.