Smyth C M, Benn D E, Reeve T S
Department of Surgery, University of Sydney, Royal North Shore Hospital, St. Leonards, N.S.W., Australia.
Clin Chem. 1988 Jun;34(6):1116-8.
To assay progesterone receptor (PR), we compared Abbott's enzyme immunoassay (PR-EIA) with a ligand-binding assay involving dextran-coated charcoal (PR-DCC), using cytosols prepared from 109 breast-cancer biopsies. Results by the two PR methods agreed well. Least-squares analysis produced a line of best fit having a slope of 0.88, an intercept on the PR-EIA axis of 16 fmol per milligram of protein, and a correlation coefficient (r2) of 0.87. To evaluate whether accurate PR-EIA measurements could be obtained on stored cytosols, we compared PR-EIA values for fresh cytosols with values for cytosols stored for various lengths of time up to 13 weeks. Agreement was excellent, especially when the samples showing very high binding (greater than 600 fmol per milligram of protein) were excluded. The lines of best fit after least-squares analyses of the remaining values had slopes between 1.0 and 1.1, intercepts less than 3 fmol/mg, and r2 all greater than 0.91.
为了检测孕激素受体(PR),我们使用从109份乳腺癌活检组织制备的胞质溶胶,将雅培公司的酶免疫测定法(PR - EIA)与一种涉及葡聚糖包被活性炭的配体结合测定法(PR - DCC)进行了比较。两种PR方法的结果吻合良好。最小二乘法分析得出一条最佳拟合线,其斜率为0.88,在PR - EIA轴上的截距为每毫克蛋白质16飞摩尔,相关系数(r2)为0.87。为了评估在储存的胞质溶胶上是否能够获得准确的PR - EIA测量值,我们将新鲜胞质溶胶的PR - EIA值与储存长达13周的不同时长的胞质溶胶的值进行了比较。一致性非常好,尤其是排除那些显示出非常高结合力(每毫克蛋白质大于600飞摩尔)的样本时。对其余值进行最小二乘法分析后的最佳拟合线斜率在1.0至1.1之间,截距小于3飞摩尔/毫克,且r2均大于0.91。