Yu Yiming, Wang Yubo, Yang Maoqing, Huang Meiping, Li Jun, Jia Qianjun, Zhuang Jian, Huang Liyu
School of Life Science and Technology, Xidian University, No. 2 Taibainan Road, Xi'an, 710071, Shaanxi, China.
Department of Catheterization Lab, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of South China Structural Heart Disease, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong General Hospital), Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Eur Radiol. 2021 Mar;31(3):1216-1226. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07238-1. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
A machine learning model was developed to evaluate the severity of aortic coarctation (CoA) in infants based on anatomical features measured on CTA.
In total, 239 infant patients undergoing both thorax CTA and echocardiography were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were assigned to either mild or severe CoA group based on their pressure gradient on echocardiography. They were further divided into patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) and non-PDA groups. The anatomical features were measured on double-oblique multiplanar reconstructed CTA images. Then, the optimal features were identified by using the Boruta algorithm. Subsequently, the coarctation severity was classified using linear discriminant analysis (LDA). We further investigated the relationship between the anatomical features and re-coarctation using Cox regression.
Four anatomical features showed significant differences between the mild and severe CoA groups, including the smallest aortic cross-sectional area indexed to body surface area (p < 0.001), the narrowest aortic diameter (CoA diameter) indexed to height (p < 0.001), the diameter of the descending aorta at the diaphragmatic level (p < 0.001) and weight (p = 0.005). With these features, accuracy of 88.6% and 90.2%, sensitivity of 65.0% and 72.1%, and specificity of 92.9% and 100% were obtained for classifying the CoA severity in the non-PDA and PDA groups, respectively. Moreover, CoA diameter indexed to weight was associated with the risk of re-coarctation.
CoA severity can be evaluated by using LDA with anatomical features. When quantifying the severity of CoA and risk of re-coarctation, both anatomical alternations at the CoA site and the growth of the patients need to be considered.
• CTA is routinely ordered for infants with coarctation of the aorta; however, whether anatomical variations observed with CTA could be used to assess the severity of CoA remains unknown. • Using the diameter and area of the coarctation site adjusted to body growth as features, the LDA model achieved an accuracy of 88.6% and 90.2% in differentiating between the mild and severe CoA patients in the non-PDA group and PDA group, respectively. • The narrowest aortic diameter (CoA diameter) indexed to weight has a hazard ratio of 10.29 for re-coarctation.
开发一种机器学习模型,以根据CTA测量的解剖特征评估婴儿主动脉缩窄(CoA)的严重程度。
回顾性分析239例接受胸部CTA和超声心动图检查的婴儿患者。根据超声心动图上的压力梯度将患者分为轻度或重度CoA组。他们进一步分为动脉导管未闭(PDA)组和非PDA组。在双斜多平面重建的CTA图像上测量解剖特征。然后,使用Boruta算法识别最佳特征。随后,使用线性判别分析(LDA)对缩窄严重程度进行分类。我们进一步使用Cox回归研究了解剖特征与再缩窄之间的关系。
四个解剖特征在轻度和重度CoA组之间显示出显著差异,包括以体表面积为指标的最小主动脉横截面积(p<0.001)、以身高为指标的最窄主动脉直径(CoA直径)(p<0.001)、膈肌水平降主动脉直径(p<0.001)和体重(p=0.005)。利用这些特征,在非PDA组和PDA组中对CoA严重程度进行分类时,准确率分别为88.6%和90.2%,敏感性分别为65.0%和72.1%,特异性分别为92.9%和100%。此外,以体重为指标的CoA直径与再缩窄风险相关。
可以使用具有解剖特征的LDA评估CoA严重程度。在量化CoA严重程度和再缩窄风险时,需要同时考虑CoA部位的解剖变化和患者的生长情况。
• 对于患有主动脉缩窄的婴儿,通常会进行CTA检查;然而,CTA观察到的解剖变异是否可用于评估CoA的严重程度仍不清楚。• 以身体生长情况调整后的缩窄部位直径和面积为特征,LDA模型在区分非PDA组和PDA组中轻度和重度CoA患者时,准确率分别达到88.6%和90.2%。• 以体重为指标的最窄主动脉直径(CoA直径)再缩窄的风险比为10.29。