Intensive Care Department, Amiens-Picardie University Hospital, Amiens, France.
Clinical Research Department, Amiens-Picardie University Hospital, Amiens, France.
Crit Care Med. 2020 Oct;48(10):e943-e950. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004512.
Evaluation of left atrial pressure is frequently required for mechanically ventilated critically ill patients. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the 2016 American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging guidelines for assessment of the pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (a frequent surrogate of left atrial pressure) in this population.
A pooled analysis of three prospective cohorts of patients simultaneously assessed with a pulmonary artery catheter and echocardiography.
Medical-surgical intensive care department of two university hospitals in France.
Mechanically ventilated critically ill patients.
None.
Of 98 included patients (males: 67%; mean ± SD age: 59 ± 16; and mean Simplified Acute Physiology Score 2: 54 ± 20), 53 (54%) experienced septic shock. Using the 2016 American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging guidelines, the predicted pulmonary artery occlusion pressure was indeterminate in 48 of the 98 patients (49%). Of the 24 patients with an elevated predicted left atrial pressure (grade II/III diastolic dysfunction), only 17 (71%) had a pulmonary artery occlusion pressure greater than or equal to 18 mm Hg. Similarly, 20 of the 26 patients (77%) with a normal predicted left atrial pressure (grade I diastolic dysfunction) had a measured pulmonary artery occlusion pressure less than 18 mm Hg. The sensitivity and specificity of American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging guidelines for predicting elevated pulmonary artery occlusion pressure were both 74%. The agreement between echocardiography and the pulmonary artery catheter was moderate (Cohen's Kappa, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.39-0.70). In a proposed alternative algorithm, the best echocardiographic predictors of a normal pulmonary artery occlusion pressure were a lateral e'-wave greater than 8 (for a left ventricular ejection fraction ≥ 45%) or an E/A ratio less than or equal to 1.5 (for a left ventricular ejection fraction < 45%).
The American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging guidelines do not accurately assess pulmonary artery occlusion pressure in ventilated critically ill patients. Simple Doppler measurements gave a similar level of diagnostic performance with less uncertainly.
对于机械通气的危重病患者,经常需要评估左心房压。本研究的目的是评估 2016 年美国超声心动图学会和欧洲心血管影像协会指南在该人群中评估肺动脉闭塞压(左心房压的常用替代指标)的适用性。
对同时接受肺动脉导管和超声心动图检查的三个前瞻性队列患者进行汇总分析。
法国两家大学医院的内科-外科重症监护病房。
机械通气的危重病患者。
无。
在 98 例纳入患者中(男性:67%;平均年龄 ± 标准差:59 ± 16 岁;简化急性生理学评分 2 平均 ± 标准差:54 ± 20),53 例(54%)发生了感染性休克。使用 2016 年美国超声心动图学会和欧洲心血管影像协会指南,98 例患者中有 48 例(49%)的预测肺动脉闭塞压不确定。在 24 例预测左心房压升高(舒张功能 II/III 级)的患者中,仅 17 例(71%)的肺动脉闭塞压大于或等于 18mmHg。同样,在 26 例(77%)预测左心房压正常(舒张功能 I 级)的患者中,有 20 例(77%)的肺动脉闭塞压小于 18mmHg。美国超声心动图学会和欧洲心血管影像协会指南预测肺动脉高压的敏感性和特异性均为 74%。超声心动图与肺动脉导管之间的一致性为中度(Cohen's Kappa,0.48;95%置信区间,0.39-0.70)。在提出的替代算法中,预测肺动脉压正常的最佳超声心动图预测指标为侧 E'波大于 8(左心室射血分数≥45%)或 E/A 比值小于或等于 1.5(左心室射血分数<45%)。
美国超声心动图学会和欧洲心血管影像协会指南不能准确评估机械通气危重病患者的肺动脉闭塞压。简单的多普勒测量具有相似的诊断性能,且不确定性更小。