Suppr超能文献

普瑞巴林单药治疗与普瑞巴林联合米那普仑治疗纤维肌痛的疗效比较。

Efficacy of pregabalin as a monotherapy versus combined pregabalin and milnacipran in the management of fibromyalgia.

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine, Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.

出版信息

Int J Rheum Dis. 2020 Nov;23(11):1474-1480. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.13953. Epub 2020 Sep 4.

Abstract

AIM

To compare the efficacy and tolerability of combined pregabalin (PGB) and milnacipran (MLN) in female patients with fibromyalgia (FM) versus PGB as a monotherapy.

METHODS

The present randomized open study included 58 female patients diagnosed with FM (registered on 4/2/19: NCT03905486). Patients were randomly divided into 2 groups (2:2); group 1 included 29 patients who received PGB monotherapy (150 mg twice daily) and group 2 included 29 patients who received combined PGB (150 mg twice daily) and MLN (50 mg twice daily) for 3 months. At the initial visit, patients were subjected to demographic data collection and assessed by the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and the FM impact questionnaire (FIQ). Outcome measures after 3 months: FIQ, VAS and Leeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire.

RESULTS

The median disease duration was 2 years in group 1 (6 months to 5 years) and 2 years in group 2 (6 months to 12 years). The dropout rate was 20.7% in group 1 (n = 6) and 10.3% in group 2 (n = 3). At the follow-up evaluation, a statistically significant improvement was observed in VAS and FIQ scores in both groups (P < 0.001). Although the percentage of patients demonstrating significant improvement in pain, disease impact and sleep pattern were higher in group 2, this did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

Although PGB as a monotherapy and in combination with MLN have both shown adequate efficacy in the treatment of patients with FM, the combined therapy did not demonstrate superiority over the monotherapy.

摘要

目的

比较普瑞巴林(PGB)联合米那普仑(MLN)与 PGB 单药治疗对纤维肌痛(FM)女性患者的疗效和耐受性。

方法

本随机开放研究纳入了 58 名确诊为 FM 的女性患者(登记时间:2019 年 4 月 2 日:NCT03905486)。患者随机分为 2 组(2:2);第 1 组 29 例患者接受 PGB 单药治疗(每日 2 次,每次 150mg),第 2 组 29 例患者接受 PGB(每日 2 次,每次 150mg)联合 MLN(每日 2 次,每次 50mg)治疗,疗程为 3 个月。在初次就诊时,患者进行人口统计学数据采集,并采用视觉模拟评分(VAS)评估疼痛和纤维肌痛影响问卷(FIQ)。3 个月后的疗效评估指标:FIQ、VAS 和利兹睡眠评估问卷。

结果

第 1 组的中位疾病病程为 2 年(6 个月至 5 年),第 2 组为 2 年(6 个月至 12 年)。第 1 组的脱落率为 20.7%(n=6),第 2 组为 10.3%(n=3)。随访评估时,两组 VAS 和 FIQ 评分均有统计学显著改善(P<0.001)。虽然第 2 组在疼痛、疾病影响和睡眠模式方面有显著改善的患者比例较高,但未达到统计学意义。

结论

尽管 PGB 单药治疗和联合 MLN 治疗均对 FM 患者有足够疗效,但联合治疗并未显示优于单药治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验