Suppr超能文献

米那普明对纤维肌痛患者疼痛的调节作用不佳:一项随机双盲对照研究。

Milnacipran poorly modulates pain in patients suffering from fibromyalgia: a randomized double-blind controlled study.

作者信息

Pickering Gisèle, Macian Nicolas, Delage Noémie, Picard Pascale, Cardot Jean-Michel, Sickout-Arondo Sophia, Giron Fatiha, Dualé Christian, Pereira Bruno, Marcaillou Fabienne

机构信息

University Clermont Auvergne Neurodol, Clermont-Ferrand, France,

Clinical Pharmacology Department CPC/CIC Inserm 1405, University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France,

出版信息

Drug Des Devel Ther. 2018 Aug 10;12:2485-2496. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S162810. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Fibromyalgia is characterized by widespread and chronic pain, and its prevalence is increasing worldwide. Milnacipran, an antidepressant, is often prescribed for fibromyalgia with a possible beneficial effect on central pain modulation. The aim of this study was to evaluate if milnacipran could modify the status of conditioned pain modulation (CPM) in patients suffering from fibromyalgia.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Randomized, double-blind controlled trial.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Women with fibromyalgia received milnacipran 100 mg or placebo. The primary end point was the evolution of CPM with treatments after a 30-second painful stimulus. Secondary outcomes included the predictability of milnacipran efficacy from CPM performance, evolution of global pain, mechanical sensitivity, thermal pain threshold, mechanical allodynia, cognitive function, and tolerance.

RESULTS

Fifty-four women with fibromyalgia (46.7±10.6 years) were included and randomized, and 24 patients were analyzed in each group. At inclusion, CPM was dysfunctional (CPM=-0.5±1.9), and global pain was 6.5±1.8. After treatment, there was a nonsignificant CPM difference between milnacipran and placebo (CPM=-0.46±1.22 vs -0.69±1.43, respectively, =0.55) and 18.8% vs 6.3% (=0.085) patients did reactivate CPM after milnacipran vs placebo. Initial CPM was not a predictor of milnacipran efficacy. Global pain, mechanical and thermal thresholds, allodynia, cognition, and tolerance were not significantly different between both groups.

CONCLUSION

Milnacipran did not display a significant analgesic effect after 1-month treatment, but the tendency of milnacipran to reactivate CPM in a number of patients must be explored with longer treatment duration in future studies and pleads for possible subtypes of fibromyalgia patients.

摘要

引言

纤维肌痛的特征是广泛且慢性的疼痛,其在全球的患病率正在上升。米那普明作为一种抗抑郁药,常被用于治疗纤维肌痛,可能对中枢性疼痛调节有有益作用。本研究的目的是评估米那普明是否能改变纤维肌痛患者的条件性疼痛调节(CPM)状态。

设计与背景

随机、双盲对照试验。

研究对象与方法

患有纤维肌痛的女性接受100毫克米那普明或安慰剂治疗。主要终点是在30秒疼痛刺激后,CPM随治疗的变化情况。次要结果包括根据CPM表现预测米那普明疗效、总体疼痛的变化、机械敏感性、热痛阈值、机械性异常性疼痛、认知功能和耐受性。

结果

纳入并随机分组了54名患有纤维肌痛的女性(46.7±10.6岁),每组分析24例患者。纳入时,CPM功能失调(CPM=-0.5±1.9),总体疼痛为6.5±1.8。治疗后,米那普明组和安慰剂组的CPM差异无统计学意义(分别为CPM=-0.46±1.22和-0.69±1.43,P=0.55),米那普明组和安慰剂组分别有18.8%和6.3%的患者CPM重新激活(P=0.085)。初始CPM不是米那普明疗效的预测指标。两组之间的总体疼痛、机械和热阈值、异常性疼痛、认知和耐受性无显著差异。

结论

米那普明治疗1个月后未显示出显著的镇痛效果,但在未来研究中,必须通过更长的治疗时间来探索米那普明在一些患者中重新激活CPM的趋势,并为纤维肌痛患者可能存在的亚型提供依据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a679/6089099/69dc2b5ee51d/dddt-12-2485Fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验