Suppr超能文献

血液系统肿瘤的常规细胞遗传学分析:美国病理学家学院/美国医学遗传学与基因组学学院细胞遗传学委员会 20 年的能力验证结果回顾。

Conventional Cytogenetic Analysis of Hematologic Neoplasms: A 20-Year Review of Proficiency Test Results From the College of American Pathologists/American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics Cytogenetics Committee.

机构信息

The Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Larson, Van Dyke, Kearney, Ketterling, Peterson, Yuhas).

The Department of Molecular Diagnostics, Legacy Laboratory Services, Legacy Health, Portland, Oregon (Akkari).

出版信息

Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2021 Feb 1;145(2):176-190. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2020-0089-CP.

Abstract

CONTEXT.—: One goal of the joint College of American Pathologists/American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics Cytogenetics Committee is to ensure the accurate detection and description of chromosomal abnormalities in both constitutional and neoplastic specimens, including hematologic neoplasms.

OBJECTIVE.—: To report a 20-year performance summary (1999-2018) of conventional chromosome challenges focusing on hematologic neoplasms.

DESIGN.—: A retrospective review was performed from 1999 through 2018 to identify karyotype challenges specifically addressing hematologic neoplasms. The overall performance of participants was examined to identify potential recurring errors of clinical significance.

RESULTS.—: Of 288 total conventional chromosome challenges from 1999-2018, 87 (30.2%) were presented in the context of a hematologic neoplasm, based on the provided clinical history, specimen type, and/or chromosomal abnormalities. For these 87 hematologic neoplasm challenges, 91 individual cases were provided and graded on the basis of abnormality recognition and karyotype nomenclature (ISCN, International System for Human Cytogenomic [previously Cytogenetic] Nomenclature). Of the 91 cases, 89 (97.8%) and 87 (95.6%) exceeded the required 80% consensus for grading of abnormality recognition and correct karyotype nomenclature, respectively. The 2 cases (2 of 91; 2.2%) that failed to meet the 80% consensus for abnormality recognition had complex karyotypes. The 4 cases (4 of 91; 4.4%) that failed to meet the 80% consensus for correct karyotype nomenclature were the result of incorrect abnormality recognition (2 cases), missing brackets in the karyotype (1 case), and incorrect breakpoint designation (1 case).

CONCLUSIONS.—: This 20-year review demonstrates clinical cytogenetics laboratories have been and continue to be highly proficient in the detection and description of chromosomal abnormalities associated with hematologic neoplasms.

摘要

背景

美国病理学家学院/美国医学遗传学与基因组学学院细胞遗传学委员会的目标之一是确保在检测和描述包括血液系统肿瘤在内的正常组织和肿瘤标本的染色体异常时做到准确无误。

目的

报告 20 年来(1999 年至 2018 年)在解决血液系统肿瘤方面的常规染色体难题方面的总结报告。

设计

对 1999 年至 2018 年期间的染色体难题进行了回顾性分析,这些难题专门针对血液系统肿瘤。对参与者的整体表现进行了检查,以确定潜在的、具有临床意义的反复错误。

结果

在 1999 年至 2018 年期间的 288 例常规染色体检测中,根据提供的临床病史、标本类型和/或染色体异常,有 87 例(30.2%)为血液系统肿瘤。在这 87 例血液系统肿瘤检测中,提供了 91 个独立的病例,并根据异常识别和核型命名(ISCN,人类细胞遗传学[以前称为细胞遗传学]命名国际系统)进行分级。在这 91 个病例中,89 例(97.8%)和 87 例(95.6%)分别超过了异常识别和正确核型命名的 80%共识分级要求。有 2 例(2 例,2.2%)未能达到 80%的异常识别共识,其核型复杂。有 4 例(4 例,4.4%)未能达到 80%的正确核型命名共识,原因是异常识别错误(2 例)、核型缺失括号(1 例)和不正确的断裂点指定(1 例)。

结论

这项为期 20 年的回顾性研究表明,临床细胞遗传学实验室在检测和描述与血液系统肿瘤相关的染色体异常方面一直表现出色,并将继续保持这种水平。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验