Suppr超能文献

Conventional Cytogenetic Analysis of Constitutional Abnormalities: A 20-Year Review of Proficiency Test Results From the College of American Pathologists/American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics Cytogenetics Committee.

作者信息

Boles Brittney, Gardner Juli-Anne, Rehder Catherine W, Levy Brynn, Velagaleti Gopalrao V, Toydemir Reha M, Sukov William R, Larson Daniel P, Cao Yang, Mixon Christopher, Vanderscheldon Rachel K, Zou Ying S, Astbury Caroline, Tsuchiya Karen D, Peterson Jess F

机构信息

From the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, Vermont (Boles, Gardner).

Department of Pathology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (Rehder).

出版信息

Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2025 Mar 1;149(3):211-216. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2024-0048-CP.

Abstract

CONTEXT.—: The joint College of American Pathologists/American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics Cytogenetics Committee works to ensure competency and proficiency of clinical cytogenetics testing laboratories through proficiency testing programs for various clinical tests offered by such laboratories, including the evaluation of constitutional abnormalities.

OBJECTIVE.—: To review and analyze 20 years of constitutional chromosome analysis proficiency testing results (2003-2022), primarily utilizing G-banded karyograms.

DESIGN.—: A retrospective review of results from 2003 through 2022 was performed, identifying challenges addressing constitutional disorders. The chromosomal abnormalities and overall performance were evaluated.

RESULTS.—: A total of 184 cases from 161 proficiency testing challenges were administered from 2003 through 2022. Challenges consisted of metaphase images and accompanying clinical history for evaluation of numerical and/or structural abnormalities. Of the 184 cases, only 2 (1%) failed to reach an 80% grading consensus for recognition of the abnormality. Both cases illustrated the limitations of correctly characterizing some chromosomal abnormalities, including recombinant chromosomal abnormalities and isochromosome identification. In addition, 2 cases failed to reach a consensus for nomenclature reporting: 1 with an isochromosome and another with a duplication.

CONCLUSIONS.—: This 20-year review illustrates the high rate of competency and proficiency of cytogenetic laboratories in the correct identification of constitutional chromosome abnormalities.

摘要

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验