The Department of Laboratory Medicine (Mendoza, Tormey, Siddon), New Haven, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Department of Pathology (Siddon), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2021 Feb 1;145(2):227-230. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2019-0663-OA.
CONTEXT.—: The significance of positive immunoglobulin (IG) or T-cell receptor (TCR) gene rearrangement studies in the context of otherwise normal ancillary findings is unknown.
OBJECTIVE.—: To examine long-term hematologic outcomes of individuals with positive gene rearrangement studies with otherwise unremarkable blood or bone marrow studies in parallel.
DESIGN.—: Data from patients who underwent IG or TCR gene rearrangement testing at the authors' affiliated Veterans Affairs Hospital January 1, 2013 to July 6, 2018 were extracted from medical records. Date of testing, specimen source, and morphologic, flow cytometric, immunohistochemical, and cytogenetic characterization of the tissue source were recorded. Gene rearrangement results were categorized as test positive/phenotype positive (T+/P+), test positive/phenotype negative (T+/P-), test negative/phenotype negative (T-/P-), or test negative/phenotype positive (T-/P+) based on comparison to other studies and/or final diagnosis. Patient records were reviewed for subsequent diagnosis of hematologic malignancy for patients with positive gene rearrangements but no other evidence for a disease process.
RESULTS.—: A total of 136 patients with 203 gene rearrangement studies were analyzed. For TCR studies, there were 2 T+/P- and 1 T-/P+ results in 47 peripheral blood assays, as well as 7 T+/P- and 1 T-/P+ results in 54 bone marrow assays. Regarding IG studies, 3 T+/P- and 12 T-/P+ results in 99 bone marrow studies were identified. None of the 12 patients with T+/P- TCR or IG gene rearrangement studies later developed a lymphoproliferative disorder.
CONCLUSIONS.—: Positive IG/TCR gene rearrangement studies in the context of otherwise negative bone marrow or peripheral blood findings are not predictive of lymphoproliferative disorders.
在其他辅助检查结果正常的情况下,免疫球蛋白(IG)或 T 细胞受体(TCR)基因重排研究的意义尚不清楚。
平行检查基因重排研究呈阳性但其他血液或骨髓检查结果无明显异常的个体的长期血液学结果。
从作者所在退伍军人事务部医院 2013 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 7 月 6 日接受 IG 或 TCR 基因重排检测的患者的病历中提取数据。记录了检测日期、标本来源以及组织来源的形态学、流式细胞术、免疫组织化学和细胞遗传学特征。根据与其他研究和/或最终诊断的比较,基因重排结果分为测试阳性/表型阳性(T+/P+)、测试阳性/表型阴性(T+/P-)、测试阴性/表型阴性(T-/P-)或测试阴性/表型阳性(T-/P+)。对基因重排呈阳性但无其他疾病过程证据的患者的病历进行回顾,以确定其是否随后诊断为血液恶性肿瘤。
共分析了 136 例患者的 203 项基因重排研究。对于 TCR 研究,在 47 项外周血检测中有 2 项 T+/P-和 1 项 T-/P+结果,在 54 项骨髓检测中有 7 项 T+/P-和 1 项 T-/P+结果。关于 IG 研究,在 99 项骨髓研究中发现了 3 项 T+/P-和 12 项 T-/P+结果。12 例 T+/P- TCR 或 IG 基因重排研究患者均未发展为淋巴增生性疾病。
在其他骨髓或外周血检查结果阴性的情况下,IG/TCR 基因重排研究阳性并不能预测淋巴增生性疾病。