Stanford W, Brundage B H, MacMillan R, Chomka E V, Bateman T M, Eldredge W J, Lipton M J, White C W, Wilson R F, Johnson M R
Department of Radiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988 Jul;12(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(88)90348-8.
Because a significant number of all patients seen by cardiologists have had coronary bypass surgery, a relatively noninvasive method of assessing coronary bypass graft patency would be very helpful. Ultrafast computed tomography, by virtue of its rapid data acquisition time and reasonable spatial resolution, may be useful in this regard. To determine the sensitivity, specificity and predictive accuracy of this imaging modality as compared with cardiac catheterization, a multicenter study was undertaken. There were two parts to the study. Part I involved the evaluation of 179 grafts in 74 patients studied in the five participating centers between March 1985 and August 1986. Twenty-nine percent of these graft studies were found to be technically inadequate and were excluded before patency determinations began. The remaining group of 127 bypass grafts in 62 patients had studies adequate for interpretation. Fifty-one grafts were to the left anterior descending coronary artery or a diagonal branch, 37 to branches of the left circumflex artery and 28 to the right coronary artery or a posterior descending vessel; in addition, there were 11 internal mammary artery bypass grafts primarily into the left anterior descending or diagonal artery distribution. The sensitivity of detecting angiographically open grafts was 93.4%, the specificity of detecting angiographically closed grafts 88.9% and the predictive accuracy was 92.1%. A subsequent study (Part 2) was performed 9 months later to assess the ability to carry out technically adequate examinations. Of the 138 consecutive graft examinations (50 patients) included in this part of the study, 94.2% of the examinations were found to be technically adequate.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
由于心脏病专家诊治的所有患者中有相当一部分接受过冠状动脉搭桥手术,因此一种相对无创的评估冠状动脉搭桥移植血管通畅性的方法将非常有用。超快速计算机断层扫描凭借其快速的数据采集时间和合理的空间分辨率,在这方面可能会有所帮助。为了确定这种成像方式与心导管检查相比的敏感性、特异性和预测准确性,开展了一项多中心研究。该研究分为两个部分。第一部分涉及1985年3月至1986年8月期间在五个参与中心对74例患者的179条移植血管进行评估。在开始确定通畅性之前,发现其中29%的移植血管研究在技术上不充分,因此被排除。其余62例患者的127条搭桥移植血管的研究足以进行解读。51条移植血管通向左前降支冠状动脉或对角支,37条通向左旋支动脉分支,28条通向右冠状动脉或后降支血管;此外,有11条乳内动脉搭桥移植血管主要分布在左前降支或对角动脉区域。血管造影显示开放的移植血管的检测敏感性为93.4%,血管造影显示闭塞的移植血管的检测特异性为88.9%,预测准确性为92.1%。9个月后进行了后续研究(第二部分),以评估进行技术上充分检查的能力。在该研究这一部分纳入的138例连续移植血管检查(50例患者)中,发现94.2%的检查在技术上是充分的。(摘要截选至250字)