• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

农村食品不安全家庭对补充营养援助计划的看法调查:定性研究。

Examining Rural Food-Insecure Families' Perceptions of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program: A Qualitative Study.

机构信息

Department of Agricultural & Human Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27659, USA.

Division of Health & Exercise Science, Western Oregon University, Monmouth, OR 97361, USA.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 2;17(17):6390. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176390.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph17176390
PMID:32887328
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7504226/
Abstract

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is a critical program that helps reduce the risk of food insecurity, yet little is known about how SNAP addresses the needs of rural, food-insecure residents in the United States (U.S.). This study examines how rural, food-insecure residents perceive SNAP. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 153 individuals living in six diverse rural regions of Arkansas, Montana, North Carolina, Oregon, Texas, and West Virginia. SNAP was described as a crucial stop-gap program, keeping families from experiencing persistent food insecurity, making food dollars stretch when the family budget is tight, and helping them purchase healthier foods. For many rural residents interviewed, SNAP was viewed in a largely positive light. In efforts to continue improving SNAP, particularly in light of its relevance during and post-coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, policymakers must be aware of rural families' perceptions of SNAP. Specific improvements may include increased transparency regarding funding formulas, budgeting and nutrition education for recipients, effective training to improve customer service, connections among social service agencies within a community, and increased availability of automation to streamline application processes.

摘要

补充营养援助计划(SNAP)是一个重要的项目,有助于降低食品不安全的风险,但人们对该计划如何满足美国农村地区食品不安全居民的需求知之甚少。本研究调查了农村地区食品不安全居民对 SNAP 的看法。在阿肯色州、蒙大拿州、北卡罗来纳州、俄勒冈州、德克萨斯州和西弗吉尼亚州的六个不同农村地区,对 153 名个人进行了半结构化访谈。SNAP 被描述为一个至关重要的临时计划,使家庭避免长期的食品不安全,在家庭预算紧张时帮助他们节省食品开支,并帮助他们购买更健康的食品。对于接受采访的许多农村居民来说,他们对 SNAP 的看法总体上是积极的。为了继续改进 SNAP,特别是考虑到它在冠状病毒(COVID-19)大流行期间和之后的相关性,政策制定者必须了解农村家庭对 SNAP 的看法。具体的改进措施可能包括增加对资金计算公式的透明度、为接受者提供预算和营养教育、加强培训以提高客户服务、在社区内建立社会服务机构之间的联系以及增加自动化程度以简化申请流程。

相似文献

1
Examining Rural Food-Insecure Families' Perceptions of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program: A Qualitative Study.农村食品不安全家庭对补充营养援助计划的看法调查:定性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 2;17(17):6390. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176390.
2
A qualitative study of diverse experts' views about barriers and strategies to improve the diets and health of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) beneficiaries.一项关于多样化专家对改善补充营养援助计划(SNAP)受益人的饮食和健康的障碍和策略的观点的定性研究。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2013 Jan;113(1):70-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2012.09.018.
3
Accessibility Landscapes of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program-Authorized Stores.补充营养援助计划授权商店的可达性景观。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018 May;118(5):836-848. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2017.11.004. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
4
Food Insecurity, Federal Nutrition Support, and Parent Feeding Practices During COVID-19: A 1-Year Follow-up Study.食品不安全、联邦营养支持和新冠疫情期间父母的喂养实践:一项为期 1 年的随访研究。
Public Health Rep. 2023 Mar-Apr;138(2):323-332. doi: 10.1177/00333549221132532. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
5
State Implementation of SNAP Waivers and Flexibilities During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Perspectives From State Agency Leaders.新冠大流行期间 SNAP 豁免和灵活性的州执行情况:州机构领导人的观点。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2022 Nov;54(11):982-997. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2022.07.009. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
6
Low-Income Urban Mothers' Experiences with the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.低收入城市母亲对补充营养援助计划的体验。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017 Oct;117(10):1538-1553. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2017.01.008. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
7
Food insecurity, fruit and vegetable consumption, and use of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) in Appalachian Ohio.阿巴拉契亚俄亥俄州的食物不安全、水果和蔬菜消费以及补充营养援助计划(SNAP)的使用情况。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 8;19(2):e0295171. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295171. eCollection 2024.
8
SNAP Participants and High Levels of Food Insecurity in the Early Stages of the COVID-19 Pandemic.参与食品保障补充营养援助计划项目者和在新冠疫情早期阶段面临高度粮食不安全者。
Public Health Rep. 2021 Jul-Aug;136(4):457-465. doi: 10.1177/00333549211007152. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
9
Evidence of Geospatial and Socioeconomic Disparities in Access to Online Grocery Shopping for Fresh and Frozen Produce in North Carolina.北卡罗来纳州线上购买新鲜和冷冻农产品的可达性存在地理空间和社会经济差异的证据。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2022 Nov;122(11):2106-2114. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2022.05.008. Epub 2022 May 13.
10
Improving the Nutritional Impact of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program:: Perspectives From the Participants.改善补充营养援助计划的营养影响:参与者的观点。
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Feb;52(2 Suppl 2):S193-S198. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.07.024.

引用本文的文献

1
"No reason for children to go hungry": Rural U.S. caregivers' perceptions of elected officials and their impacts on food policy.“儿童不应挨饿”:美国农村照顾者对民选官员的看法及其对食品政策的影响
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 22;20(7):e0320453. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320453. eCollection 2025.
2
Predictors of Food Insecurity and Food Assistance Program Usage Among Puerto Ricans Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Holyoke, Massachusetts.马萨诸塞州 Holyoke 市波多黎各人在 COVID-19 大流行之前和期间食物不安全和使用食品援助计划的预测因素。
Nutrients. 2024 Oct 28;16(21):3666. doi: 10.3390/nu16213666.
3
Food Insecurity in the Rural United States: An Examination of Struggles and Coping Mechanisms to Feed a Family among Households with a Low-Income.美国农村地区的粮食不安全问题:对低收入家庭喂养家庭的挣扎和应对机制的考察。
Nutrients. 2022 Dec 9;14(24):5250. doi: 10.3390/nu14245250.
4
Federal Food Assistance Program Participation during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Participant Perspectives and Reasons for Discontinuing.联邦食品援助计划在 COVID-19 大流行期间的参与情况:参与者的观点和中断的原因。
Nutrients. 2022 Oct 27;14(21):4524. doi: 10.3390/nu14214524.
5
Giving Families a Voice for Equitable Healthy Food Access in the Wake of Online Grocery Shopping.在在线杂货购物之后,为家庭争取公平健康食品获取权。
Nutrients. 2022 Oct 19;14(20):4377. doi: 10.3390/nu14204377.
6
Hardship in the Heartland: Associations Between Rurality, Income, and Material Hardship.中心地带的困境:农村、收入与物质匮乏之间的关联
Rural Sociol. 2022 Sep;87(3):936-959. doi: 10.1111/ruso.12435. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
7
A qualitative analysis of SNAP and minimum wage policies as experienced by workers with lower incomes.对低收入工人所经历的补充营养援助计划(SNAP)和最低工资政策的定性分析。
J Hunger Environ Nutr. 2022;17(4):521-539. doi: 10.1080/19320248.2021.1997859. Epub 2021 Nov 14.
8
Rural vulnerability and institutional dynamics in the context of COVID-19: A scoping review.新冠疫情背景下的农村脆弱性与制度动态:一项范围综述
Jamba. 2022 Aug 31;14(1):1227. doi: 10.4102/jamba.v14i1.1227. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Importance of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program in Rural America.美国农村补充营养援助计划的重要性。
Am J Public Health. 2019 Dec;109(12):1641-1645. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305359. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
2
Food Insecurity, Food "Deserts," and Glycemic Control in Patients With Diabetes: A Longitudinal Analysis.食物不安全、食物“荒漠”与糖尿病患者的血糖控制:纵向分析。
Diabetes Care. 2018 Jun;41(6):1188-1195. doi: 10.2337/dc17-1981. Epub 2018 Mar 19.
3
Participation in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program and maternal depressive symptoms: Moderation by program perception.参与补充营养援助计划与产妇抑郁症状:计划认知的调节作用。
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Jan;197:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.11.039. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
4
The Affordability of MyPlate: An Analysis of SNAP Benefits and the Actual Cost of Eating According to the Dietary Guidelines.“我的餐盘”计划的可承受性:根据膳食指南对补充营养援助计划福利与饮食实际成本的分析
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2017 Sep;49(8):623-631.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2017.06.005.
5
Juggling the five dimensions of food access: Perceptions of rural low income residents.兼顾食物获取的五个维度:农村低收入居民的认知
Appetite. 2016 Oct 1;105:151-5. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.05.013. Epub 2016 May 18.
6
Perceived and geographic food access and food security status among households with children.有子女家庭的感知食物可及性、地理食物可及性及粮食安全状况
Public Health Nutr. 2016 Oct;19(15):2781-8. doi: 10.1017/S1368980016000859. Epub 2016 May 2.
7
Dietary Quality of Americans by Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Participation Status: A Systematic Review.按补充营养援助计划参与状况划分的美国人饮食质量:一项系统综述。
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Oct;49(4):594-604. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.04.035. Epub 2015 Aug 1.
8
Low-Income Individuals' Perceptions About Fruit and Vegetable Access Programs: A Qualitative Study.低收入个体对水果和蔬菜获取项目的认知:一项定性研究。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2015 Jul-Aug;47(4):317-24.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2015.03.005. Epub 2015 Apr 22.
9
How Much Does the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Reduce Food Insecurity?补充营养援助计划能在多大程度上减轻粮食不安全状况?
Am J Agric Econ. 2011;93(4):1082-1098. doi: 10.1093/ajae/aar026.
10
Supplemental nutrition assistance program participation and child food security.补充营养援助计划参与度与儿童食品安全。
Pediatrics. 2014 Apr;133(4):610-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-2823. Epub 2014 Mar 3.