• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
"No reason for children to go hungry": Rural U.S. caregivers' perceptions of elected officials and their impacts on food policy.“儿童不应挨饿”:美国农村照顾者对民选官员的看法及其对食品政策的影响
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 22;20(7):e0320453. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320453. eCollection 2025.
2
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
3
Factors that influence parents' and informal caregivers' views and practices regarding routine childhood vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响父母和非正式照顾者对常规儿童疫苗接种看法和做法的因素:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 27;10(10):CD013265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013265.pub2.
4
Factors that influence caregivers' and adolescents' views and practices regarding human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination for adolescents: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响照顾者和青少年对青少年人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)疫苗接种的看法及做法的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Apr 15;4(4):CD013430. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013430.pub2.
5
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
6
Parents' and informal caregivers' views and experiences of communication about routine childhood vaccination: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.父母及非正式照料者关于儿童常规疫苗接种沟通的观点与经历:定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 7;2(2):CD011787. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011787.pub2.
7
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
8
A Pilot Study of Political Experiences and Barriers to Voting Among Autistic Adults Participating in Online Survey Research in the United States.一项针对参与美国在线调查研究的成年自闭症患者的政治经历和投票障碍的试点研究。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):261-272. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0119. eCollection 2025 Jun.
9
Community First Responders' role in the current and future rural health and care workforce: a mixed-methods study.社区第一响应者在当前和未来农村卫生和保健劳动力中的作用:一项混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Jul;12(18):1-101. doi: 10.3310/JYRT8674.
10
"Listening to understand," exploring postpartum women's perceptions of their social networks and social support in relation to their health behaviors and weight: A qualitative exploratory study.“倾听以理解”:一项定性探索性研究,探讨产后女性对其社交网络以及与健康行为和体重相关的社会支持的认知
Womens Health (Lond). 2025 Jan-Dec;21:17455057241309774. doi: 10.1177/17455057241309774.

本文引用的文献

1
Food for thought: The intersection between SNAP stigma, food insecurity, and gender.值得深思的问题:食品券耻辱感、粮食不安全与性别之间的交集。
Soc Sci Med. 2024 Nov;361:117367. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117367. Epub 2024 Oct 1.
2
Food security among SNAP participants 2019 to 2021: a cross-sectional analysis of current population survey food security supplement data.2019 年至 2021 年参与补充营养援助计划(SNAP)人群的粮食安全状况:对当前人口调查粮食安全补充数据的横断面分析。
J Nutr Sci. 2023 Apr 11;12:e45. doi: 10.1017/jns.2023.32. eCollection 2023.
3
A Mixed Methods, Quasi-Experimental Evaluation Exploring the Impact of a Secondary School Universal Free School Meals Intervention Pilot.一项混合方法、准实验评估,探索中学普及免费校餐干预试点的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 22;20(6):5216. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20065216.
4
Dollar Stores and Food Access for Rural Households in the United States, 2008‒2020.2008 年至 2020 年美国农村家庭的美元商店与食物获取
Am J Public Health. 2023 Mar;113(3):331-336. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2022.307193. Epub 2023 Jan 19.
5
Food Insecurity in the Rural United States: An Examination of Struggles and Coping Mechanisms to Feed a Family among Households with a Low-Income.美国农村地区的粮食不安全问题:对低收入家庭喂养家庭的挣扎和应对机制的考察。
Nutrients. 2022 Dec 9;14(24):5250. doi: 10.3390/nu14245250.
6
Strategies to Improve Adolescent Food Security from the Perspectives of Policy Advocates, Parents, and Adolescents.从政策倡导者、家长和青少年的角度探讨改善青少年食品安全的策略。
Nutrients. 2022 Nov 8;14(22):4707. doi: 10.3390/nu14224707.
7
Food Insecurity, Federal Nutrition Support, and Parent Feeding Practices During COVID-19: A 1-Year Follow-up Study.食品不安全、联邦营养支持和新冠疫情期间父母的喂养实践:一项为期 1 年的随访研究。
Public Health Rep. 2023 Mar-Apr;138(2):323-332. doi: 10.1177/00333549221132532. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
8
Federal Food Assistance Program Participation during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Participant Perspectives and Reasons for Discontinuing.联邦食品援助计划在 COVID-19 大流行期间的参与情况:参与者的观点和中断的原因。
Nutrients. 2022 Oct 27;14(21):4524. doi: 10.3390/nu14214524.
9
The development of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program enrollment accessibility (SNAP-access) score.补充营养援助计划登记可及性(SNAP-access)评分的发展
Disabil Health J. 2022 Oct;15(4):101366. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2022.101366. Epub 2022 Aug 6.
10
The intersection of welfare stigma, state contexts and health among mothers receiving public assistance benefits.领取公共援助福利的母亲中福利污名、国家背景与健康的交叉关系。
SSM Popul Health. 2022 May 9;18:101117. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101117. eCollection 2022 Jun.

“儿童不应挨饿”:美国农村照顾者对民选官员的看法及其对食品政策的影响

"No reason for children to go hungry": Rural U.S. caregivers' perceptions of elected officials and their impacts on food policy.

作者信息

Hardison-Moody Annie, Haynes-Maslow Lindsey, Bowen Sarah K

机构信息

Department of Agricultural and Human Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America.

Department of Health Policy and Management, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Jul 22;20(7):e0320453. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320453. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0320453
PMID:40694544
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12282922/
Abstract

In the context of the increasingly polarized U.S. political environments of the 2016 and 2020 elections, how did rural caregivers think about food and health policies? To answer this question, researchers interviewed 50 low-income women living in two rural N.C. counties in 2016/7 and 2020 as part of a broader longitudinal qualitative study of family food environments. As participants reflected on elections and food assistance policies, caregivers focused on their experiences as mothers and described current or potential policies and programs in light of how they would impact their children. Caregivers also made recommendations for universal and inclusive policies that would improve their access to food. However, their responses were also racialized, with White caregivers more likely to use tropes of "deservingness" when discussing public benefits. To improve food security in rural areas, researchers should center rural low-income women's perspectives when developing food policy, particularly given the important role mothers play in feeding their families and mitigating the impacts of food insecurity.

摘要

在2016年和2020年美国政治环境日益两极分化的背景下,农村照顾者如何看待食品和健康政策?为了回答这个问题,研究人员在2016/17年和2020年采访了居住在北卡罗来纳州两个农村县的50名低收入女性,这是一项关于家庭食物环境的更广泛纵向定性研究的一部分。当参与者反思选举和食品援助政策时,照顾者关注她们作为母亲的经历,并根据这些政策和项目对孩子的影响来描述当前或潜在的政策和项目。照顾者还对能够改善她们获取食物机会的普遍和包容性政策提出了建议。然而,她们的回答也带有种族色彩,白人照顾者在讨论公共福利时更有可能使用“应得性”的比喻。为了改善农村地区的粮食安全,研究人员在制定食品政策时应将农村低收入女性的观点作为核心,特别是考虑到母亲在为家人提供食物和减轻粮食不安全影响方面所起的重要作用。