Suppr超能文献

母体氧暴露可能不会改变脐静脉血氧分压:一项随机对照试验的非随机配对静脉和动脉样本。

Maternal oxygen exposure may not change umbilical cord venous partial pressure of oxygen: non-random, paired venous and arterial samples from a randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Chinese PLA General Hospital, Medical School of Chinese PLA, Fuxing Road No. 28, Beijing, 100853, China.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sixth Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Sep 4;20(1):510. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03212-3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite the widespread use of oxygen (O) in intrauterine resuscitation, the obstetric scientists' understanding of O therapy is full of contradictions. We tested the hypothesis that higher maternal arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PO) is associated with higher umbilical cord venous PO (UvPO).

METHODS

This is a planned secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial (RCT), 443 normal women were 1:1 randomly allocated to receive 2 L/min O or room air from the onset of second stage to delivery. We reported that maternal 2 L/min O exposure cannot affect the umbilical cord arterial pH or the fetal heart rate (FHR) pattern. In 217 non-random samples, we found 2 L/min O exposure increased the maternal arterial PO to the median 150 mmHg (hemoglobin would be saturated). The primary outcome for this analysis was UvPO in these non-random samples.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the O group (N = 107) and the control group (N = 110) in the UvPO (median 30.2, interquartile 25.4-35.2 versus median 28.3, interquartile 23.4-35.3, mmHg, P = 0.379). There were also no significant differences between room air and different percentiles of O exposure duration (< 25th, ≧ 25th < 50th, ≧ 50th < 75th, ≧ 75th percentile) in the UvPO.

CONCLUSIONS

Maternal O exposure at super-physiological levels (median arterial blood PO 150 mmHg) in normal labor may not change the UvPO.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02221440 , first posted in 20 August 2014.

摘要

背景

尽管在子宫内复苏中广泛使用氧气(O),但产科科学家对 O 治疗的理解充满了矛盾。我们检验了这样一个假设,即较高的母体动脉氧分压(PO)与较高的脐静脉 PO(UvPO)相关。

方法

这是一项随机对照试验(RCT)的计划二次分析,443 名正常女性被 1:1 随机分配接受 2L/min O 或从第二产程开始到分娩时的空气。我们报告称,母体 2L/min O 暴露不能影响脐动脉 pH 值或胎儿心率(FHR)模式。在 217 个非随机样本中,我们发现 2L/min O 暴露将母体动脉 PO 提高至中位数 150mmHg(血红蛋白将饱和)。本次分析的主要结局是这些非随机样本中的 UvPO。

结果

O 组(N=107)和对照组(N=110)在 UvPO 方面无显著差异(中位数 30.2,四分位距 25.4-35.2 与中位数 28.3,四分位距 23.4-35.3,mmHg,P=0.379)。在 UvPO 中,空气与不同 O 暴露时间百分位数(<25th,≧25th<50th,≧50th<75th,≧75th 百分位)之间也无显著差异。

结论

在正常分娩中,母体暴露于超生理水平的 O(中位数动脉血 PO 150mmHg)可能不会改变 UvPO。

临床试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02221440,首次于 2014 年 8 月 20 日发布。

相似文献

2
The duration of intrapartum supplemental oxygen administration and umbilical cord oxygen content.产时补充氧时间与脐静脉血氧含量。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Sep;223(3):440.e1-440.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.05.056. Epub 2020 Jun 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Oxygen and pulmonary vasodilation: The role of oxidative and nitrosative stress.氧和肺血管舒张:氧化和硝化应激的作用。
Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Apr;25(2):101083. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2020.101083. Epub 2020 Jan 16.
6
Whither oxygen for intrauterine resuscitation?宫内复苏用氧的去向?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Apr;212(4):461-2. 461.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.01.057. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
8
Maternal oxygen administration for intrauterine resuscitation.用于宫内复苏的母体吸氧
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Mar;212(3):409. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.11.006. Epub 2014 Nov 8.
9
Maternal oxygen use during labor.分娩期间母体的氧气使用情况。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Mar;212(3):410. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.11.004. Epub 2014 Nov 7.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验