Suppr超能文献

β受体阻滞剂在急性冠脉综合征经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的作用。

Role of beta blockers following percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Eastern Health, Box Hill Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Heart. 2021 May;107(9):728-733. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2020-316605. Epub 2020 Sep 4.

Abstract

AIMS

There is a paucity of evidence supporting routine beta blocker (BB) use in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The aim of this study was to evaluate BB use post PCI and its association with mortality. Furthermore, the study aimed to evaluate the association between BB and mortality in the subgroups of patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <35%, LVEF 35%-50% and LVEF >50%.

METHODS

Using a large PCI registry, data from patients with ACS between January 2005 and June 2017 who were alive at 30 days were analysed. Those patients taking BB at 30 days were compared with those who were not taking BB. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. The mean follow-up was 5.3±3.5 years.

RESULTS

Of the 17 562 patients, 83.3% were on BB. Mortality was lower in the BB group (13.1% vs 19.5%, p=0.0001). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards model showed that BB use was associated with lower overall mortality (adjusted HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.97, p=0.014). In the subgroup analysis, BB use was associated with reduced mortality in LVEF <35% (adjusted HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.91, p=0.013), LVEF 35%-50% (adjusted HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.95, p=0.01), but not LVEF >50% (adjusted HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.21, p=0.74).

CONCLUSION

BB use remains high and is associated with reduced mortality. This reduction in mortality is primarily seen in those with reduced ejection fraction, but not in those with preserved ejection fraction.

摘要

目的

在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者中,常规使用β受体阻滞剂(BB)的证据很少。本研究的目的是评估 PCI 后 BB 的使用情况及其与死亡率的关系。此外,本研究旨在评估 BB 在左心室射血分数(LVEF)<35%、LVEF 35%-50%和 LVEF>50%的亚组患者中与死亡率的关系。

方法

利用一个大型 PCI 注册中心的数据,分析了 2005 年 1 月至 2017 年 6 月期间存活至 30 天的 ACS 患者的 BB 使用情况。将 30 天内服用 BB 的患者与未服用 BB 的患者进行比较。主要终点是全因死亡率。平均随访时间为 5.3±3.5 年。

结果

在 17562 例患者中,83.3%服用 BB。BB 组死亡率较低(13.1% vs 19.5%,p=0.0001)。多变量 Cox 比例风险模型显示,BB 使用与总体死亡率降低相关(调整后的 HR 0.87,95%CI 0.78 至 0.97,p=0.014)。在亚组分析中,BB 使用与 LVEF<35%(调整后的 HR 0.63,95%CI 0.44 至 0.91,p=0.013)、LVEF 35%-50%(调整后的 HR 0.80,95%CI 0.68 至 0.95,p=0.01)患者死亡率降低相关,但与 LVEF>50%(调整后的 HR 1.03,95%CI 0.87 至 1.21,p=0.74)患者死亡率降低无关。

结论

BB 的使用仍然很高,与死亡率降低相关。这种死亡率的降低主要发生在射血分数降低的患者中,而不是射血分数正常的患者中。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验