Research Group of Industrial Microbiology and Food Biotechnology (IMDO), Faculty of Sciences and Bioengineering Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Adjunct Faculty, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.
Am J Clin Nutr. 2020 Oct 1;112(4):931-936. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqaa236.
Excessive attention to the animal versus plant binary food choice reflects society's moral views on eating right. To claim that avoidance of animal products is required to prevent chronic disease is not supported by evidence, makes little sense from an evolutionary perspective, and distracts policy makers from common-sense approaches to achieve adequate nutrition. Animal products provide highly bioavailable nutrients, some of which are not easily obtained from plants, and can play a key role in meeting the nutritional challenges of populations in both high- and low-income countries. This role goes beyond the need for protein and relates to vitamins, minerals, and numerous often-overlooked nutrients, such as long-chain fatty acids, taurine, and choline. Restrictive dietary prescriptions that exclude animal products complicate the quest for optimal nutrition by undermining dietary diversity and flexibility, and by introducing a dependency on fortification and supplementation. Thus, a vegan diet may put the general population at increased risk of poor nutrition, a problem of particular concern for those with special nutritional requirements.
过度关注动物与植物的二元食物选择反映了社会对正确饮食的道德观念。声称避免动物产品是预防慢性病所必需的,这种说法没有证据支持,从进化的角度来看也没有什么意义,而且会使政策制定者忽视实现充足营养的常识性方法。动物产品提供了高生物可利用的营养物质,其中一些营养物质不易从植物中获得,并且可以在满足高收入和低收入国家人群的营养挑战方面发挥关键作用。这种作用超出了对蛋白质的需求,还涉及维生素、矿物质和许多经常被忽视的营养素,如长链脂肪酸、牛磺酸和胆碱。排除动物产品的限制性饮食处方通过破坏饮食的多样性和灵活性,并引入对强化和补充的依赖,使人们更难以追求最佳营养。因此,素食可能会使普通人群面临营养不良的风险增加,对于那些有特殊营养需求的人来说,这是一个特别令人关注的问题。