Rating of Pelvic Floor Muscle Training Mobile Applications for Treatment of Urinary Incontinence in Women.

OBJECTIVE

To identify pelvic floor muscle therapy mobile health applications (apps) targeting women with urinary incontinence (UI), and evaluate them in a standardized fashion.

METHODS

A systematic search of English language apps on the Canadian App Store (iOS) and Google Play (Android) Store was performed. Eligible apps were evaluated independently by 5 reviewers using the validated Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS) tool. Descriptive characteristics were summarized and MARS subscale and overall quality scores werereported.

RESULTS

Of 139 mobile health apps identified, 20 unique apps were included for full review, of which there were 7 iOS only apps, 6 Android only apps, and 7 apps available in both stores. At the time of analysis, most apps had been updated within the last year (60%). Only 1 app had been trialed and verified by evidence in scientific literature. The majority of apps were free to download (80%). The median (interquartile range) MARS overall quality score was 3.7 (0.8) on a 0-5 scale, ranging from 2.7 to 4.1. The highest-rated subscale was "functionality" with a median score of 4.1 (0.6); the lowest-rated was "information" with a median score of 3.4 (0.6). The median MARS subjective quality score was 2.9 (1.0).

CONCLUSION

There are both free and paid apps available on-line that deliver pelvic floor muscle therapy programs. Evaluation using the MARS tool identified that many apps are not of high quality, and only 1 was evidence-based and has been trialed clinically. This knowledge is relevant to the choice of apps by both patients and caregivers.