Department of Medicine 1, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Deutsches Zentrum für Immuntherapie, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 May 3;10(5):e31102. doi: 10.2196/31102.
Patients suffering from inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) frequently need long-term medical treatment. Mobile apps promise to complement and improve IBD management, but so far there has been no scientific analysis of their quality.
This study evaluated the quality of German mobile apps targeting IBD patients and physicians treating IBD patients using the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS).
The German Apple App Store and Google Play Store were systematically searched to identify German IBD mobile apps for patient and physician use. MARS was used by 6 physicians (3 using Android smartphones and 3 using iPhones) to independently assess app quality. Apps were randomly assigned so that the 4 apps with the most downloads were rated by all raters and the remaining apps were rated by 1 Android and 1 iOS user.
In total, we identified 1764 apps in the Apple App Store and Google Play Store. After removing apps that were not related to IBD (n=1386) or not available in German (n=317), 61 apps remained. After removing duplicates (n=3) and apps for congresses (n=7), journals (n=4), and clinical studies (n=6), as well as excluding apps that were available in only 1 of the 2 app stores (n=20) and apps that could only be used with an additional device (n=7), we included a total of 14 apps. The app "CED Dokumentation und Tipps" had the highest overall median MARS score at 4.11/5. On the whole, the median MARS scores of the 14 apps ranged between 2.38/5 and 4.11/5. As there was no significant difference between iPhone and Android raters, we used the Wilcoxon comparison test to calculate P values.
The MARS ratings showed that the quality of German IBD apps varied. We also discovered a discrepancy between app store ratings and MARS ratings, highlighting the difficulty of assessing perceived app quality. Despite promising results from international studies, there is little evidence for the clinical benefits of German IBD apps. Clinical studies and patient inclusion in the app development process are needed to effectively implement mobile apps in routine care.
患有炎症性肠病(IBD)的患者经常需要长期的医疗治疗。移动应用程序有望补充和改善 IBD 的管理,但迄今为止,还没有对其质量进行科学分析。
本研究使用移动应用程序评级量表(MARS)评估针对 IBD 患者和治疗 IBD 患者的德国移动应用程序的质量。
系统地搜索了德国的 Apple App Store 和 Google Play Store,以确定针对患者和医生使用的德国 IBD 移动应用程序。6 名医生(使用 3 部 Android 智能手机和 3 部 iPhone)使用 MARS 独立评估应用程序质量。应用程序被随机分配,因此下载量最多的 4 个应用程序由所有评估者进行评估,其余应用程序由 1 个 Android 用户和 1 个 iOS 用户进行评估。
在 Apple App Store 和 Google Play Store 中,我们总共确定了 1764 个应用程序。在删除与 IBD 无关的应用程序(n=1386)或不可用的德语应用程序(n=317)后,还剩 61 个应用程序。在删除重复项(n=3)和会议应用程序(n=7)、期刊(n=4)和临床研究(n=6)以及排除仅在 2 个应用商店中的 1 个商店中可用的应用程序(n=20)和仅可与其他设备一起使用的应用程序(n=7)后,我们共包括 14 个应用程序。应用程序“CED Dokumentation und Tipps”的总体 MARS 评分中位数最高,为 4.11/5。总体而言,这 14 个应用程序的 MARS 评分中位数范围在 2.38/5 到 4.11/5 之间。由于 iPhone 和 Android 评估者之间没有显著差异,因此我们使用 Wilcoxon 比较检验来计算 P 值。
MARS 评分表明德国 IBD 应用程序的质量存在差异。我们还发现应用商店评分和 MARS 评分之间存在差异,这凸显了评估感知应用程序质量的难度。尽管国际研究取得了有希望的结果,但德国 IBD 应用程序在临床获益方面的证据很少。需要进行临床研究和患者纳入应用程序开发过程,以便在常规护理中有效实施移动应用程序。