Suppr超能文献

生物基木材防腐剂:与商业木材防腐剂相比,其功效、浸出性和生态毒性。

Bio-based wood preservatives: Their efficiency, leaching and ecotoxicity compared to a commercial wood preservative.

机构信息

School of Forest Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 111, Joensuu 80101, Finland.

Department of Environmental and Biological Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 111, Joensuu 80101, Finland.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2021 Jan 20;753:142013. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142013. Epub 2020 Aug 26.

Abstract

Companies in the wood industry are constantly developing their outdoor products. The possibility of using bio-based chemicals as an alternative to traditional wood preservatives-regulated in Europe by The Biocidal Products Regulation No 528/2012-has been considered, but chemical leaching from the wood decreases its effectiveness and may negatively affect the environment. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of bio-based chemicals with potential use in wood preservation to commercially available preservatives, to investigate their fixation to wood and their ecotoxicity and to quantify the potentially toxic elements leached from the wood. Pyrolysis distillates of tree bark, organic acids found in distillates, Colatan GT10 tannin extract and log soaking liquid as a hardwood veneer process residue were tested and compared with commercial pine oil and a copper-based wood preservative. In the wood decay test of impregnated pine sapwood specimens, Colatan GT10 extract performed as well as the commercial wood preservatives. The same decay trial with leached specimens significantly reduced the performance of the bio-based chemicals. The results of the ecotoxicity test with photoluminescent Aliivibrio fischeri bacteria showed that many bio-based chemicals with potential use in wood preservation have markedly lower ecotoxicity than commercially available wood preservatives, but the ecotoxicity of some bio-based chemicals is higher, as in the case of some of the pyrolysis distillates. The wood preservation efficiency and the ecotoxicity of the studied chemicals had a poor correlation, implying that other factors besides treatment agent toxicity play a role in deterring fungal growth on treated wood. The amount of elemental toxins in the leachates was low. These results emphasize the importance of the chemical ecotoxicity of bio-based preservative compounds, as their detrimental effect on the environment can be higher than that of the traditional preservatives unless effectively linked to wood to prevent leaching.

摘要

木材行业的公司一直在不断开发户外产品。已经考虑使用生物基化学品替代传统木材防腐剂,欧洲通过《生物杀灭剂产品法规》第 528/2012 号进行监管,但木材中的化学浸出会降低其效力,并可能对环境产生负面影响。本研究旨在比较具有木材防腐潜在用途的生物基化学品与市售防腐剂的有效性,研究它们在木材中的固定性及其生态毒性,并量化木材中浸出的潜在有毒元素。已测试并比较了树树皮的热解馏分、馏分中发现的有机酸、Colatan GT10 单宁提取物和硬木单板处理残留的原木浸泡液,以及商业松油和铜基木材防腐剂。在浸渍松木边材标本的木材腐朽试验中,Colatan GT10 提取物的性能与商业木材防腐剂相当。用浸出标本进行相同的腐朽试验显著降低了生物基化学品的性能。用发光细菌 Aliivibrio fischeri 进行的生态毒性试验结果表明,许多具有木材防腐潜在用途的生物基化学品的生态毒性明显低于市售木材防腐剂,但一些生物基化学品的生态毒性更高,如某些热解馏分。研究中化学物质的木材防腐效率和生态毒性之间相关性较差,这意味着除处理剂毒性外,其他因素在阻止真菌在处理过的木材上生长方面也发挥作用。浸出液中元素毒素的含量很低。这些结果强调了生物基防腐剂化合物的化学生态毒性的重要性,因为它们对环境的不利影响可能高于传统防腐剂,除非它们有效地与木材结合以防止浸出。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验