Stook Kristin, Tolaymat Thabet, Ward Marnie, Dubey Brajesh, Townsend Timothy, Solo-Gabriele Helena, Bitton Gabriel
Department of Environmental Engineering Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, USA.
Environ Sci Technol. 2005 Jan 1;39(1):155-63. doi: 10.1021/es0493603.
Size-reduced samples of southern yellow pine dimensional lumber, each treated with one of five different waterborne chemical preservatives, were leached using 18-h batch leaching tests. The wood preservatives included chromated copper arsenate (CCA), alkaline copper quaternary, copper boron azole, copper citrate, and copper dimethyldithiocarbamate. An unpreserved wood sample was tested as well. The batch leaching tests followed methodology prescribed in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP). The wood samples were first size-reduced and then leached using four different leaching solutions (synthetic landfill leachate, synthetic rainwater, deionized water, and synthetic seawater). CCA-treated wood leached greater concentrations of arsenic and copper relative to chromium, with copper leaching more with the TCLP and synthetic seawater. Copper leached at greater concentrations from the arsenic-free preservatives relative to CCA. Arsenic leached from CCA-treated wood at concentrations above the U.S. federal toxicity characteristic limit (5 mg/L). All of the arsenic-free alternatives displayed a greater degree of aquatic toxicity compared to CCA. Invertebrate and algal assays were more sensitive than Microtox. Examination of the relative leaching of the preservative compounds indicated that the arsenic-free preservatives were advantageous over CCA with respect to waste disposal and soil contamination issues but potentially posed a greater risk to aquatic ecosystems.
对南方黄松规格材的缩尺样本进行了处理,每个样本用五种不同的水性化学防腐剂之一进行处理,然后使用18小时的间歇浸出试验进行浸出。木材防腐剂包括铬酸铜砷酸盐(CCA)、碱性铜季铵盐、铜硼唑、柠檬酸铜和二甲基二硫代氨基甲酸铜。还测试了一个未处理的木材样本。间歇浸出试验遵循美国环境保护局毒性特征浸出程序(TCLP)规定的方法。木材样本首先进行缩尺,然后使用四种不同的浸出溶液(合成垃圾渗滤液、合成雨水、去离子水和合成海水)进行浸出。与铬相比,CCA处理的木材浸出的砷和铜浓度更高,在TCLP和合成海水条件下铜的浸出量更多。相对于CCA,无砷防腐剂浸出的铜浓度更高。CCA处理的木材浸出的砷浓度高于美国联邦毒性特征限值(5毫克/升)。与CCA相比,所有无砷替代品都表现出更高程度的水生毒性。无脊椎动物和藻类试验比Microtox更敏感。对防腐剂化合物相对浸出情况的检查表明,就废物处理和土壤污染问题而言,无砷防腐剂比CCA更具优势,但可能对水生生态系统构成更大风险。
Environ Sci Technol. 2005-1-1
J Hazard Mater. 2004-10-18
J Environ Manage. 2005-4
J Hazard Mater. 2009-10-20
Environ Sci Technol. 2004-9-1
Toxicol Ind Health. 2007-5
J Hazard Mater. 2002-1-28
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2017-10-26
Environ Geochem Health. 2010-4-20
Environ Pollut. 2010-1-6
Environ Sci Technol. 2007-3-1
Environ Sci Technol. 2006-2-1