Suppr超能文献

一项回顾性研究比较了个体化解剖学单束和双束前交叉韧带重建手术的临床效果。

A retrospective study to compare the clinical effects of individualized anatomic single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery.

机构信息

Department of Sports Medicine, Key Laboratory of Tissue Engineering of Shenzhen, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital/The First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University Health Science Center, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.

School of Medicine, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2020 Sep 7;10(1):14712. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-71721-4.

Abstract

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of single- and double- bundle individualized anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, we retrospectively analyzed the data and charts of 920 patients with ACL rupture who received individualized anatomic ACL reconstruction surgery at our center. All of the patients underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction with autologous hamstring tendons. The patients were divided into two groups: the single-bundle individualized anatomic reconstruction group (N = 539), and the double-bundle individualized anatomic reconstruction group (N = 381). The IKDC, Lysholm and Tegner scores were used to subjectively evaluate the function of the knee joint during the postoperative follow-up. The Lachman test, pivot shift test and KT-3000 were used to objectively evaluate the stability of the knee. All 920 patients participated in clinical follow-up (average duration: 27.91 ± 3.61 months) achieved satisfied outcomes with few complications. The postoperative IKDC, Lysholm and Tegner scores, and the objective evaluation of knee joint stability were significantly improved compared to the preoperative status in both groups (P < 0.05). No statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups at the final follow-up (P > 0.05). Therefore, no difference in terms of the IKDC, Lysholm and Tegner score, or KT-3000 was observed between the individualized anatomic single- and double-bundle ACL reconstruction techniques. Both techniques can be used to restore the stability and functionality of the knee joint with satisfactory short-term efficacy.

摘要

为了评估单束和双束个体化解剖前交叉韧带(ACL)重建的临床疗效,我们回顾性分析了 920 例在我中心接受个体化解剖 ACL 重建手术的 ACL 断裂患者的资料和图表。所有患者均接受关节镜下自体腘绳肌腱 ACL 重建。患者分为两组:单束个体化解剖重建组(N=539)和双束个体化解剖重建组(N=381)。采用 IKDC、Lysholm 和 Tegner 评分对膝关节术后随访功能进行主观评估,Lachman 试验、前抽屉试验和 KT-3000 对膝关节稳定性进行客观评估。920 例患者均参与临床随访(平均随访时间:27.91±3.61 个月),均取得满意疗效,并发症少。两组术后 IKDC、Lysholm 和 Tegner 评分及膝关节稳定性客观评估均较术前明显改善(P<0.05)。末次随访时两组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。因此,个体化解剖单束和双束 ACL 重建技术在 IKDC、Lysholm 和 Tegner 评分或 KT-3000 方面无差异。两种技术均可恢复膝关节的稳定性和功能,短期疗效满意。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/079f/7477567/7c0ce2e4594f/41598_2020_71721_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验