Suppr超能文献

三种电子烟气溶胶的毒理学分析,采用正常人体支气管上皮细胞。

Toxicological analysis of aerosols derived from three electronic nicotine delivery systems using normal human bronchial epithelial cells.

机构信息

School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30030, United States of America.

Tobacco Inorganics Group, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30341, United States of America.

出版信息

Toxicol In Vitro. 2020 Dec;69:104997. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2020.104997. Epub 2020 Sep 5.

Abstract

Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) are a rapidly growing global market advertised as a safer alternative to combustible cigarettes. However, comprehensive investigations of END aerosol physicochemical and toxicological properties have not been fully explored across brands to assess relative safety. In this study, we evaluated aerosols collected from three ENDS - Juul Fruit Medley (5% nicotine), Logic Power (2.4% nicotine), and Mistic (1.8% nicotine). ENDS aerosols were generated using standard machine puffing regimen and collected with a novel fluoropolymer condensation trap. Triple quadrupole-inductively coupled plasma-mass determined the presence of heavy metals in collected aerosols. The toxicological effects of ENDS aerosols on normal human bronchial epithelial cells (NHBE) were investigated using cellular viability, reactive oxygen species, oxidative stress assays, along with DNA damage assessments using the CometChip©. Results indicated the total metal concentrations within collected ENDS aerosols were higher for Mistic and Logic compared to Juul. Logic Power aerosols elicited higher reactive oxygen species levels than Mistic and Juul in NHBE after 24-h exposure. Similar dose-dependent reductions of cellular viability and total glutathione were found for each exposure. However, Logic and Juul aerosols caused greater single stranded DNA damage compared to Mistic. Our study indicates that regardless of brand, ENDS aerosols are toxic to upper airway epithelial cells and may pose a potential respiratory hazard to occasional and frequent users.

摘要

电子尼古丁传送系统(ENDS)是一个快速发展的全球市场,被宣传为比可燃香烟更安全的替代品。然而,尚未全面探索不同品牌的 ENDS 气溶胶物理化学和毒理学特性,以评估相对安全性。在这项研究中,我们评估了三种 ENDS 产生的气溶胶 - Juul 水果混合口味(5%尼古丁)、Logic Power(2.4%尼古丁)和 Mistic(1.8%尼古丁)。使用标准机器抽吸方案生成 ENDS 气溶胶,并使用新型氟聚合物冷凝阱收集。三重四极杆电感耦合等离子体质谱法确定了收集到的气溶胶中重金属的存在。使用细胞活力、活性氧、氧化应激测定以及使用 CometChip©进行 DNA 损伤评估,研究了 ENDS 气溶胶对正常人类支气管上皮细胞(NHBE)的毒理学影响。结果表明,与 Juul 相比,Mistic 和 Logic 收集的 ENDS 气溶胶中的总金属浓度更高。Logic Power 气溶胶在暴露 24 小时后,在 NHBE 中产生的活性氧水平高于 Mistic 和 Juul。对于每种暴露,都发现细胞活力和总谷胱甘肽的相似剂量依赖性降低。然而,Logic 和 Juul 气溶胶引起的单链 DNA 损伤比 Mistic 更大。我们的研究表明,无论品牌如何,ENDS 气溶胶对上呼吸道上皮细胞都具有毒性,并且可能对偶尔和经常使用者构成潜在的呼吸道危害。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

9
Oxidative Stress: Harms and Benefits for Human Health.氧化应激:对人类健康的危害与益处
Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2017;2017:8416763. doi: 10.1155/2017/8416763. Epub 2017 Jul 27.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验