Suppr超能文献

755纳米皮秒激光、755纳米和532纳米纳秒激光治疗咖啡斑(CALMs)的比较疗效:一项随机、双侧皮损临床试验

Comparative Effectiveness of 755-nm Picosecond Laser, 755- and 532-nm Nanosecond Lasers for Treatment of Café-au-Lait Macules (CALMs): A Randomized, Split-Lesion Clinical Trial.

作者信息

Cen Qingqing, Gu Yifei, Luo Lan, Shang Ying, Rao Yamin, Zhu Jiafang, Han Yue, Yu Wenxin, Liu Ying, Wu Xianglei, Ying Hanru, Ma Gang, Lin Xiaoxi

机构信息

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No. 639 Zhizaoju Road, Shanghai, Shanghai, 200011, PR China.

Department of Laser and Aesthetic Medicine, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No. 639 Zhizaoju Road, Shanghai, Shanghai, 200011, PR China.

出版信息

Lasers Surg Med. 2021 Apr;53(4):435-442. doi: 10.1002/lsm.23316. Epub 2020 Sep 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Many types of lasers have been used to treat café-au-lait macules (CALMs) since the introduction of the selective photothermolysis theory. However, the efficacy and safety of picosecond lasers, compared with those of nanosecond lasers, have not been researched. To compare the efficacy and safety of 755 nm picosecond laser (PS-755 nm), Q-switched (QS) Alexandrite 755 nm nanosecond laser (QS-755 nm), and QS Nd:YAG 532 nm nanosecond laser (QS-532 nm) for treating CALMs.

STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-one patients received several treatments at 3-month intervals. Lesions were divided into two or three approximately equal parts, which were randomly treated with PS-755 nm, QS-755 nm, and QS-532 nm. The safety and efficacy of three lasers were determined based on blinded visual assessments and self-reports of patients three months after the comparative trial.

RESULTS

Visual assessment 3 months after the comparative trial revealed that there was no statistically significant difference among the sites treated by QS-755 nm (2.84 ± 1.11), QS-532 nm (2.63 ± 1.06), and PS-755 nm (2.74 ± 1.05) lasers. Five (26.32%) of 19 patients showed lesion recurrence. Adverse effects included acneiform miliaris, hypopigmentation, and hyperpigmentation, which were resolved within 12 months. Five (26.32%) of 19 patients who showed lesion recurrence 1-5 months after laser treatment had lightened or cleared at least 50% of the lesion. 46.67% of patients were satisfied or very satisfied with the outcome of the overall treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

PS-755 nm, QS-755 nm, and QS-532 nm laser treatments were equally effective in treating and improving CALMs. PS-755 nm caused fewer adverse effects. Individuals can react differently to different types of lasers. Patch tests should be conducted before the treatment. Lasers Surg. Med. © 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

摘要

背景与目的

自选择性光热解理论提出以来,多种类型的激光已被用于治疗咖啡斑(CALMs)。然而,与纳秒激光相比,皮秒激光的疗效和安全性尚未得到研究。比较755nm皮秒激光(PS - 755nm)、调Q(QS)翠绿宝石755nm纳秒激光(QS - 755nm)和QS Nd:YAG 532nm纳秒激光(QS - 532nm)治疗咖啡斑的疗效和安全性。

研究设计/材料与方法:41例患者每隔3个月接受多次治疗。将皮损分为两或三个大致相等的部分,分别随机用PS - 755nm、QS - 755nm和QS - 532nm进行治疗。基于双盲视觉评估和对比试验3个月后患者的自我报告来确定三种激光的安全性和疗效。

结果

对比试验3个月后的视觉评估显示,QS - 755nm(2.84±1.11)、QS - 532nm(2.63±1.06)和PS - 755nm(2.74±1.05)激光治疗的部位之间无统计学显著差异。19例患者中有5例(26.32%)出现皮损复发。不良反应包括粟丘疹样痤疮、色素减退和色素沉着,这些在12个月内均得到缓解。激光治疗后1 - 5个月出现皮损复发的19例患者中有5例(26.32%)皮损减轻或消退至少50%。46.67%的患者对整体治疗结果满意或非常满意。

结论

PS - 755nm、QS - 755nm和QS - 532nm激光治疗在治疗和改善咖啡斑方面同样有效。PS - 755nm引起的不良反应较少。个体对不同类型激光的反应可能不同。治疗前应进行斑贴试验。激光外科与医学。©2020威利期刊有限责任公司。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验