Department of Respiratory Medicine, Kettering General Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Kettering, UK.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Kettering General Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Kettering, UK.
Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Mar;75(3):e13702. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.13702. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is straining healthcare resources. Molecular testing turnaround time precludes having results at the point-of-care (POC) thereby exposing COVID-19/Non-COVID-19 patients while awaiting diagnosis. We evaluated the utility of a triage strategy including FebriDx, a 10-minute POC finger-stick blood test that differentiates viral from bacterial acute respiratory infection through detection of Myxovirus-resistance protein A (MxA) and C-reactive protein (CRP), to rapidly isolate viral cases requiring confirmatory testing.
This observational, prospective, single-center study enrolled patients presenting to/within an acute care hospital in England with suspected COVID-19 between March and April 2020. Immunocompetent patients ≥16 years requiring hospitalisation with pneumonia or acute respiratory distress syndrome or influenza-like illness (fever and ≥1 respiratory symptom within 7 days of enrolment, or inpatients with new respiratory symptoms, fever of unknown cause or pre-existing respiratory condition worsening). The primary endpoint was diagnostic performance of FebriDx to identify COVID-19 as a viral infection; secondary endpoint was SARS-CoV-2 molecular test diagnostic performance compared with the reference standard COVID-19 Case Definition (molecular or antibody detection of SARS-CoV-2).
Valid results were available for 47 patients. By reference standard, 35 had viral infections (34/35 COVID-19; 1/35 non-COVID-19; overall FebriDx viral sensitivity 97.1% (95%CI 83.3-99.9)). Of the COVID-19 cases, 34/34 were FebriDx viral positive (sensitivity 100%; 95%CI 87.4-100); 29/34 had an initial SARS-CoV-2 positive molecular test (sensitivity 85.3%; 95%CI 68.2-94.5). FebriDx was viral negative when the diagnosis was not COVID-19 and SARS-Cov-2 molecular test was negative (negative predictive value (NPV) 100% (13/13; 95%CI 71.7-100)) exceeding initial SARS-CoV-2 molecular test NPV 72.2% (13/19; 95%CI 46.4-89.3). The diagnostic specificity of FebriDx and initial SARS-CoV-2 molecular test was 100% (13/13; 95%CI 70-100 and 13/13; 95%CI 85.4-100, respectively).
FebriDx could be deployed as part of a reliable triage strategy for identifying symptomatic cases as possible COVID-19 in the pandemic.
2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行正在使医疗资源紧张。分子检测周转时间不允许在即时护理点(POC)获得结果,从而使 COVID-19/非 COVID-19 患者在等待诊断时暴露出来。我们评估了一种分诊策略的效用,该策略包括 FebriDx,这是一种 10 分钟的即时护理点指尖采血测试,通过检测流感病毒抗性蛋白 A(MxA)和 C 反应蛋白(CRP)来区分病毒与细菌急性呼吸道感染,从而快速隔离需要进行确认测试的病毒病例。
这是一项观察性、前瞻性、单中心研究,纳入了 2020 年 3 月至 4 月期间在英国一家急性护理医院就诊/住院的疑似 COVID-19 患者。免疫功能正常的患者≥16 岁,需要住院治疗肺炎或急性呼吸窘迫综合征或流感样疾病(发病后 7 天内出现发热和≥1 种呼吸道症状,或住院患者出现新的呼吸道症状、不明原因发热或原有呼吸道疾病恶化)。主要终点是 FebriDx 对 COVID-19 作为病毒感染的诊断性能;次要终点是 SARS-CoV-2 分子检测与参考标准 COVID-19 病例定义(SARS-CoV-2 的分子或抗体检测)的诊断性能比较。
47 名患者的有效结果可用。根据参考标准,35 名患者患有病毒感染(34/35 COVID-19;1/35 非 COVID-19;FebriDx 病毒总体敏感性为 97.1%(95%CI 83.3-99.9%))。在 COVID-19 病例中,34/34 例 FebriDx 病毒检测阳性(敏感性 100%(95%CI 87.4-100%));29/34 例 SARS-CoV-2 初始分子检测阳性(敏感性 85.3%(95%CI 68.2-94.5%))。当诊断不是 COVID-19 且 SARS-CoV-2 分子检测为阴性时,FebriDx 为病毒阴性(阴性预测值(NPV)为 100%(13/13;95%CI 71.7-100%)),超过 SARS-CoV-2 初始分子检测的 NPV 72.2%(13/19;95%CI 46.4-89.3%)。FebriDx 和 SARS-CoV-2 初始分子检测的诊断特异性均为 100%(13/13;95%CI 70-100 和 13/13;95%CI 85.4-100)。
FebriDx 可作为一种可靠的分诊策略的一部分,用于在大流行期间识别有症状的病例作为可能的 COVID-19 病例。