• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

钝性脑血管损伤的自然史:10 年间在 1 级创伤中心的经验。

Natural History of Blunt Cerebrovascular Injury: Experience Over a 10-year Period at a Level I Trauma Center.

机构信息

From the Departments of Radiology (L.W., D.C., L.C., J.V., C.C., D.S.H., M.M.B.) and Neurologic Surgery (C.W., R.H.B.), University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA 98195-0005; and Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Denver, Colo (C.W.).

出版信息

Radiology. 2020 Nov;297(2):428-435. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020192866. Epub 2020 Sep 8.

DOI:10.1148/radiol.2020192866
PMID:32897159
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7889045/
Abstract

Background Blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) is associated with increased stroke and mortality risk. However, the most appropriate follow-up strategy remains uncertain. Purpose To better understand the natural history of BCVI and help define the most optimal timing and length of follow-up imaging. Materials and Methods In this retrospective HIPAA-compliant study, data from all patients treated for BCVI at a level I trauma center between April 1, 2005, and June 30, 2015, were reviewed. For patients with at least one follow-up study, time-to-event analysis was performed to assess the trend in injury evolution. Association of injury grade and injury evolution was also assessed. The Fisher exact test and multivariable logistic regression were used to evaluate association of the number of injured vessels, vessel grade, and vessel type (internal carotid artery, vertebral artery) with BCVI-associated stroke. Results A total of 1204 patients (800 men; mean age ± standard deviation, 45 years ± 22) with 1604 vessel injuries were evaluated. High-grade (grades 3-5) injuries were less likely to resolve (hazard ratio [HR], 0.2; < .001) than low-grade injuries. High-grade injuries were more likely to progress than low-grade injuries (HR, 3.3; = .005). Of the injuries that improved or resolved (343 of 419 [81.9%]), 76% (259 of 343) changed within 30 days after the initial injury, and the remaining 24% (84 of 343) changed between 30 and 90 days. Of the injuries that progressed (46 of 419 [11.0%]), 87% (40 of 46) changed within 90 days. Beyond 90 days, no improvement or resolution occurred, and only 1.4% (six of 419) of injuries progressed. Higher injury grade (adjusted odds ratio, 2.0 per one-grade increase [95% confidence interval {CI}: 1.6, 2.4]; < .001), carotid injuries versus vertebral artery injuries (49 of 420 [11.7%] vs 35 of 667 [5.2%]; < .001), and increasing number of vessels injured per patient (adjusted odds ratio, 1.6 per one-vessel increase [95% CI: 1.3, 2.2]; < .001) were associated with increased risk for BCVI-related stroke. Conclusion Most blunt cerebrovascular injury-related changes occurred within 30 days; changes rarely occurred beyond 90 days. Follow-up imaging is therefore unlikely to be helpful beyond 90 days. © RSNA, 2020 See also the editorial by Talbott in this issue.

摘要

背景 钝性脑血管损伤 (BCVI) 与增加的中风和死亡风险相关。然而,最合适的随访策略仍不确定。目的 为了更好地了解 BCVI 的自然史,并帮助确定最合适的随访成像时间和长度。材料与方法 在这项回顾性 HIPAA 合规性研究中,对 2005 年 4 月 1 日至 2015 年 6 月 30 日期间在一级创伤中心接受 BCVI 治疗的所有患者的数据进行了回顾。对于至少有一次随访研究的患者,进行了时间事件分析以评估损伤演变的趋势。还评估了损伤等级和损伤演变之间的关系。Fisher 精确检验和多变量逻辑回归用于评估损伤血管数量、血管等级和血管类型(颈内动脉、椎动脉)与 BCVI 相关中风的关系。结果 共评估了 1204 例患者(800 例男性;平均年龄±标准差,45 岁±22 岁)和 1604 个血管损伤。高级(等级 3-5)损伤不太可能解决(风险比[HR],0.2;<.001),而低级损伤则可能解决。高级损伤比低级损伤更有可能进展(HR,3.3;=.005)。在改善或解决的损伤中(419 例中的 343 例[81.9%]),76%(259 例中的 343 例)在最初损伤后 30 天内发生变化,其余 24%(343 例中的 84 例)在 30 至 90 天之间发生变化。在进展的损伤中(419 例中的 46 例[11.0%]),87%(46 例中的 40 例)在 90 天内发生变化。90 天以后,没有改善或解决,只有 1.4%(419 例中的 6 例)的损伤进展。更高的损伤等级(调整优势比,每增加一级增加 2.0[95%置信区间{CI}:1.6, 2.4];<.001),颈动脉损伤与椎动脉损伤(49 例中的 420 例[11.7%]与 35 例中的 667 例[5.2%];<.001),以及每位患者受伤血管数量的增加(调整优势比,每增加一个血管增加 1.6[95%CI:1.3, 2.2];<.001)与 BCVI 相关中风的风险增加相关。结论 大多数与钝性脑血管损伤相关的变化发生在 30 天内;90 天以后很少发生变化。因此,90 天以后的随访成像不太可能有帮助。©RSNA,2020 也请参阅本期 Talbott 的社论。

相似文献

1
Natural History of Blunt Cerebrovascular Injury: Experience Over a 10-year Period at a Level I Trauma Center.钝性脑血管损伤的自然史:10 年间在 1 级创伤中心的经验。
Radiology. 2020 Nov;297(2):428-435. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020192866. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
2
Limitations of multidetector computed tomography angiography for the diagnosis of blunt cerebrovascular injury.多排螺旋 CT 血管造影诊断钝性脑血管损伤的局限性。
J Neurosurg. 2018 Jun;128(6):1642-1647. doi: 10.3171/2017.2.JNS163264. Epub 2017 Aug 11.
3
Initial screening test for blunt cerebrovascular injury: Validity assessment of whole-body computed tomography.钝性脑血管损伤的初始筛查试验:全身计算机断层扫描的有效性评估
Surgery. 2015 Sep;158(3):627-35. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.03.063. Epub 2015 Jun 9.
4
Clinical and radiographic outcomes following traumatic Grade 3 and 4 carotid artery injuries: a 10-year retrospective analysis from a Level 1 trauma center. The Parkland Carotid and Vertebral Artery Injury Survey.创伤性3级和4级颈动脉损伤后的临床和影像学结果:来自一级创伤中心的10年回顾性分析。帕克兰颈动脉和椎动脉损伤调查。
J Neurosurg. 2015 Mar;122(3):610-5. doi: 10.3171/2014.10.JNS14875. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
5
Blunt cerebrovascular injury: incidence and long-term follow-up.钝性脑血管损伤:发生率及长期随访。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021 Feb;47(1):161-170. doi: 10.1007/s00068-019-01171-9. Epub 2019 Jun 13.
6
Treatment-related outcomes from blunt cerebrovascular injuries: importance of routine follow-up arteriography.钝性脑血管损伤的治疗相关结果:常规随访血管造影的重要性。
Ann Surg. 2002 May;235(5):699-706; discussion 706-7. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200205000-00012.
7
Clinical and radiographic outcomes following traumatic Grade 1 and 2 carotid artery injuries: a 10-year retrospective analysis from a Level I trauma center. The Parkland Carotid and Vertebral Artery Injury Survey.1级和2级创伤性颈动脉损伤后的临床和影像学结果:来自一级创伤中心的10年回顾性分析。帕克兰颈动脉和椎动脉损伤调查。
J Neurosurg. 2015 May;122(5):1196-201. doi: 10.3171/2015.1.JNS14642. Epub 2015 Mar 20.
8
Association between cervical fracture patterns and blunt cerebrovascular injury when screened with computed tomographic angiography.颈椎骨折类型与计算机断层血管造影筛查出的钝性脑血管损伤之间的相关性。
Spine J. 2024 Feb;24(2):310-316. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.09.010. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
9
The role of number of affected vessels on radiologic and clinical outcomes of patients with blunt cerebrovascular injury.影响血管数量对钝性脑血管损伤患者的影像学和临床结果的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Sep;80(3):685-692. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.04.053. Epub 2024 Apr 25.
10
What Are the Expected Findings on Follow-up Computed Tomography Angiogram in Post-traumatic Patients With Blunt Cerebrovascular Injury?外伤性钝性脑血管损伤患者的随访计算机断层血管造影有哪些预期结果?
Can Assoc Radiol J. 2018 Aug;69(3):266-276. doi: 10.1016/j.carj.2018.01.004. Epub 2018 Jun 27.

引用本文的文献

1
A blunt look at stroke risk in BCVI: Do multiple injuries increase the risk of stroke?直面钝性脑血管损伤的中风风险:多处损伤会增加中风风险吗?
Am J Surg. 2025 Jun 11:116480. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116480.
2
The effect of circle of willis anatomy and scanning practices on outcomes for blunt cerebrovascular injuries.Willis 环解剖结构和扫描实践对钝性脑血管损伤结果的影响。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2024 Jun 17;32(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s13049-024-01225-x.
3
Imaging of cerebrovascular complications from blunt skull base trauma.颅脑基底钝器伤后脑血管并发症的影像学表现。
Emerg Radiol. 2024 Aug;31(4):529-542. doi: 10.1007/s10140-024-02243-z. Epub 2024 May 28.
4
Endovascular Embolization of Traumatic Vessel Injury Using N-butyl Cyanoacrylate: A Case Series.使用氰基丙烯酸正丁酯对创伤性血管损伤进行血管内栓塞:病例系列
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Apr;76(2):1554-1562. doi: 10.1007/s12070-023-04357-1. Epub 2023 Dec 8.
5
Vessel Wall Imaging in Cryptogenic Stroke.隐匿性卒中的血管壁成像。
Radiol Clin North Am. 2023 May;61(3):491-500. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2023.01.006. Epub 2023 Feb 20.
6
Current Concepts in Imaging Diagnosis and Screening of Blunt Cerebrovascular Injuries.目前关于钝性脑血管损伤的影像学诊断和筛查的概念。
Tomography. 2022 Feb 7;8(1):402-413. doi: 10.3390/tomography8010033.
7
Vessel Wall MR Imaging in the Pediatric Head and Neck.小儿头颈部管壁磁共振成像。
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2021 Nov;29(4):595-604. doi: 10.1016/j.mric.2021.06.009.

本文引用的文献

1
The ability of magnetic resonance black blood vessel wall imaging to evaluate blunt cerebrovascular injury following acute trauma.磁共振黑血血管壁成像评价急性创伤后钝性脑血管损伤的能力。
J Neuroradiol. 2020 May;47(3):210-215. doi: 10.1016/j.neurad.2019.01.091. Epub 2019 Jan 21.
2
Time to stroke: A Western Trauma Association multicenter study of blunt cerebrovascular injuries.时间推移:西部创伤协会多发伤性脑动脉损伤的多中心研究。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018 Nov;85(5):858-866. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001989.
3
Imaging and Management of Blunt Cerebrovascular Injury.钝性脑血管损伤的影像学与处理。
Radiographics. 2018 Mar-Apr;38(2):542-563. doi: 10.1148/rg.2018170140.
4
Transcranial Doppler Microemboli Monitoring for Stroke Risk Stratification in Blunt Cerebrovascular Injury.经颅多普勒微栓子监测在钝性脑血管损伤中风风险分层中的应用
Crit Care Med. 2017 Oct;45(10):e1011-e1017. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002549.
5
Long-term follow-up of blunt cerebrovascular injuries: Does time heal all wounds?钝性脑血管损伤的长期随访:时间能治愈所有创伤吗?
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016 Dec;81(6):1063-1069. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001223.
6
Clinical and radiographic outcomes following traumatic Grade 1 and 2 carotid artery injuries: a 10-year retrospective analysis from a Level I trauma center. The Parkland Carotid and Vertebral Artery Injury Survey.1级和2级创伤性颈动脉损伤后的临床和影像学结果:来自一级创伤中心的10年回顾性分析。帕克兰颈动脉和椎动脉损伤调查。
J Neurosurg. 2015 May;122(5):1196-201. doi: 10.3171/2015.1.JNS14642. Epub 2015 Mar 20.
7
Clinical and radiographic outcomes following traumatic Grade 3 and 4 carotid artery injuries: a 10-year retrospective analysis from a Level 1 trauma center. The Parkland Carotid and Vertebral Artery Injury Survey.创伤性3级和4级颈动脉损伤后的临床和影像学结果:来自一级创伤中心的10年回顾性分析。帕克兰颈动脉和椎动脉损伤调查。
J Neurosurg. 2015 Mar;122(3):610-5. doi: 10.3171/2014.10.JNS14875. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
8
Early repeat imaging is not warranted for high-grade blunt cerebrovascular injuries.对于重度钝性脑血管损伤,早期重复成像并无必要。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Oct;77(4):540-5; quiz 650. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000418.
9
Endovascular stenting is rarely necessary for the management of blunt cerebrovascular injuries.血管内支架置入术很少用于治疗钝性脑血管损伤。
J Am Coll Surg. 2014 May;218(5):1012-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.01.042. Epub 2014 Feb 3.
10
Timing and mechanism of ischemic stroke due to extracranial blunt traumatic cerebrovascular injury.因颅外钝性创伤性脑血管损伤导致的缺血性脑卒中的时间和机制。
J Neurosurg. 2013 Feb;118(2):397-404. doi: 10.3171/2012.11.JNS121038. Epub 2012 Dec 7.