Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Sinai Health System and the Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Dec 1;180(12):1596-1605. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.4199.
Previous observational studies have suggested that fluoroquinolones are associated with aortic aneurysm or dissection, but these studies may be subject to confounding by indication or surveillance bias.
To assess the association of fluoroquinolones with risk of aortic aneurysm or aortic dissection (AA/AD) while accounting for potential confounding by fluoroquinolone indication and bias owing to differential surveillance.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In an observational cohort study using a US commercial claims database, 2 pairwise 1:1 propensity score-matched cohorts were identified: patients aged 50 years or older with a diagnosis of pneumonia 3 days or less before initiating treatment with a fluoroquinolone or azithromycin and patients aged 50 years or older with a urinary tract infection (UTI) diagnosis 3 days or less before initiating a fluoroquinolone or combined trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs were estimated controlling for 85 baseline confounders. In a secondary analysis, patients receiving fluoroquinolones were compared with those receiving amoxicillin, both with and without considering baseline aortic imaging, to address differences in detection of AA/AD before antibiotic use. Data on patients within the database from January 1, 2003, through September 30, 2015, were analyzed. Data analysis was conducted from July 23, 2019, to July 6, 2020.
Hospitalization for AA/AD occurring within 60 days following treatment initiation.
After propensity score matching, patient characteristics were well balanced, with 279 554 patients (mean [SD] age, 63.66 [10.93] years; 149 976 women [53.6%]) in the pneumonia cohort and 948 364 patients (mean [SD] age, 62.06 [10.33] years; 823 667 women [86.9%]) in the UTI cohort. Initiators of fluoroquinolones (n = 139 772 pairs in the pneumonia cohort and n = 474 182 pairs in the UTI cohort) had an increased rate of AA/AD compared with initiators of azithromycin (HR, 2.57; 95% CI, 1.36-4.86; incidence, 0.03% for fluoroquinolones vs 0.01% for azithromycin) but no increased rate compared with initiators of combined trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.62-1.57; incidence, <0.01% in both UTI groups). Secondary analysis using amoxicillin as a comparator (n = 3 976 162 pairs) produced results consistent with those from earlier studies (HR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.33-1.79; incidence, <0.01% in both groups). Requiring baseline imaging in this cohort (n = 542 649 pairs) to address surveillance bias attenuated the increased rate (HR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.96-1.33; incidence, 0.06% for fluoroquinolones vs 0.05% for amoxicillin).
The findings of this nationwide cohort study of adults with pneumonia or UTI suggest an increased relative rate of AA/AD associated with fluoroquinolones within the pneumonia cohort but not within the UTI cohort. In both cohorts, the absolute rate of AA/AD appeared to be low (<0.1%). The increased relative rate observed in the pneumonia cohort may be due to residual confounding or surveillance bias.
先前的观察性研究表明,氟喹诺酮类药物与主动脉瘤或夹层(AA/AD)有关,但这些研究可能受到指示性混杂或因监测偏倚导致的偏差。
在考虑氟喹诺酮类药物适应证的潜在混杂因素和因差异监测导致的偏倚的情况下,评估氟喹诺酮类药物与主动脉瘤或夹层(AA/AD)风险之间的关联。
设计、设置和参与者: 在一项使用美国商业索赔数据库的观察性队列研究中,确定了 2 对 1:1 的倾向评分匹配队列:50 岁或以上的患者,在开始氟喹诺酮类药物或阿奇霉素治疗前 3 天内诊断为肺炎,以及 50 岁或以上的患者,在开始氟喹诺酮类药物或联合使用甲氧苄啶和磺胺甲恶唑治疗前 3 天内诊断为尿路感染(UTI)。通过控制 85 个基线混杂因素,估计了风险比(HRs)和 95%置信区间(CIs)。在二次分析中,比较了接受氟喹诺酮类药物治疗的患者与接受阿莫西林治疗的患者,同时考虑和不考虑基线主动脉成像,以解决抗生素使用前 AA/AD 的检测差异。分析了 2003 年 1 月 1 日至 2015 年 9 月 30 日期间数据库内的患者数据。数据分析于 2019 年 7 月 23 日至 2020 年 7 月 6 日进行。
治疗开始后 60 天内发生的 AA/AD 住院。
在倾向评分匹配后,患者特征得到了很好的平衡,肺炎队列中有 279554 名患者(平均[标准差]年龄为 63.66[10.93]岁;149976 名女性[53.6%]),UTI 队列中有 948364 名患者(平均[标准差]年龄为 62.06[10.33]岁;823667 名女性[86.9%])。氟喹诺酮类药物的启动者(肺炎队列中 139772 对,UTI 队列中 474182 对)与阿奇霉素的启动者相比,AA/AD 的发生率更高(HR,2.57;95%CI,1.36-4.86;氟喹诺酮类药物的发生率为 0.03%,阿奇霉素的发生率为 0.01%),但与联合使用甲氧苄啶和磺胺甲恶唑的启动者相比,AA/AD 的发生率没有增加(HR,0.99;95%CI,0.62-1.57;在两个 UTI 组中发生率均<0.01%)。使用阿莫西林作为比较剂的二次分析(n=3976162 对)产生的结果与早期研究一致(HR,1.54;95%CI,1.33-1.79;在两个组中发生率均<0.01%)。在本队列中需要基线成像(n=542649 对)以解决监测偏倚,这降低了升高的发生率(HR,1.13;95%CI,0.96-1.33;氟喹诺酮类药物的发生率为 0.06%,阿莫西林的发生率为 0.05%)。
这项针对肺炎或 UTI 成人的全国性队列研究的结果表明,在肺炎队列中氟喹诺酮类药物与 AA/AD 的相对发生率增加,但在 UTI 队列中没有增加。在两个队列中,AA/AD 的绝对发生率似乎都很低(<0.1%)。肺炎队列中观察到的相对发生率增加可能是由于残留混杂或监测偏倚。