Faculty of Pharmacy, National Yang-Ming University School of Pharmaceutical Science, Taipei, Taiwan.
Institute of Public Health, National Yang-Ming University School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Dec 1;180(12):1587-1595. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.4192.
Prior observational studies have suggested that fluoroquinolone use may be associated with more than 2-fold increased risk of aortic aneurysm or aortic dissection (AA/AD). These studies, however, did not fully consider the role of coexisting infections and the risk of fluoroquinolones relative to other antibiotics.
To estimate the risk of AA/AD associated with infections and to assess the comparative risk of AA/AD associated with fluoroquinolones vs other antibiotics with similar indication profiles among patients with the same types of infections.
DESIGNS, SETTINGS, AND PARTICIPANTS: This nested case-control study identified 21 651 176 adult patients from a nationwide population-based health insurance claims database from January 1, 2009, to November 30, 2015. Each incident case of AA/AD was matched with 10 control individuals by age, sex, and follow-up duration in the database using risk-set sampling. Analysis of the data was conducted from April 2019 to March 2020.
Infections and antibiotic use within a 60-day risk window before the occurrence of AA/AD.
Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs comparing infections for which fluoroquinolones are commonly used with no infection within a 60-day risk window before outcome occurrence, adjusting for baseline confounders and concomitant antibiotic use. The adjusted ORs comparing fluoroquinolones with antibiotics with similar indication profiles within patients with indicated infections were also estimated.
A total of 28 948 cases and 289 480 matched controls were included (71.37% male; mean [SD] age, 67.41 [15.03] years). Among these, the adjusted OR of AA/AD for any indicated infections was 1.73 (95% CI, 1.66-1.81). Septicemia (OR, 3.16; 95% CI, 2.63-3.78) and intra-abdominal infection (OR, 2.99; 95% CI, 2.45-3.65) had the highest increased risk. Fluoroquinolones were not associated with an increased AA/AD risk when compared with combined amoxicillin-clavulanate or combined ampicillin-sulbactam (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.82-1.24) or with extended-spectrum cephalosporins (OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.70-1.11) among patients with indicated infections. The null findings for fluoroquinolone use remained robust in different subgroup and sensitivity analyses.
These results highlight the importance of accounting for coexisting infections while examining the safety of antibiotics using real-world data; the findings suggest that concerns about AA/AD risk should not deter fluoroquinolone use for patients with indicated infections.
先前的观察性研究表明,氟喹诺酮类药物的使用可能与主动脉瘤或主动脉夹层(AA/AD)的风险增加两倍以上有关。然而,这些研究并未充分考虑共存感染的作用,以及氟喹诺酮类药物相对于其他具有相似适应证的抗生素的风险。
评估与感染相关的 AA/AD 风险,并评估在患有相同类型感染的患者中,与其他具有相似适应证的抗生素相比,氟喹诺酮类药物与 AA/AD 相关的相对风险。
设计、设置和参与者:这项嵌套病例对照研究从 2009 年 1 月 1 日至 2015 年 11 月 30 日,从全国性基于人群的健康保险索赔数据库中确定了 21651176 名成年患者。通过风险集抽样,按年龄、性别和数据库中随访时间,将每个 AA/AD 事件病例与 10 名对照个体相匹配。数据分析于 2019 年 4 月至 2020 年 3 月进行。
在 AA/AD 发生前 60 天的风险窗口期内发生的感染和抗生素使用情况。
使用条件逻辑回归来估计感染的比值比(OR)和 95%置信区间(CI),比较氟喹诺酮类药物通常用于感染与无感染在 60 天风险窗口期内,调整基线混杂因素和同时使用抗生素。还估计了在有指征感染的患者中,氟喹诺酮类药物与具有相似适应证谱的抗生素之间的调整后 OR。
共纳入 28948 例病例和 289480 例匹配对照(71.37%为男性;平均[SD]年龄为 67.41[15.03]岁)。其中,任何有指征感染的 AA/AD 的调整后 OR 为 1.73(95%CI,1.66-1.81)。败血症(OR,3.16;95%CI,2.63-3.78)和腹腔内感染(OR,2.99;95%CI,2.45-3.65)的风险增加最高。与联合阿莫西林-克拉维酸或联合氨苄西林-舒巴坦(OR,1.01;95%CI,0.82-1.24)或与扩展谱头孢菌素(OR,0.88;95%CI,0.70-1.11)相比,氟喹诺酮类药物与 AA/AD 风险增加无关在有指征感染的患者中。氟喹诺酮类药物使用的阴性结果在不同的亚组和敏感性分析中仍然稳健。
这些结果强调了在使用真实世界数据检查抗生素安全性时,考虑共存感染的重要性;研究结果表明,对于有指征感染的患者,不应因担心 AA/AD 风险而阻止使用氟喹诺酮类药物。