• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头孢托罗匹酯与万古霉素加氨曲南治疗急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染的比较:一项 3 期、随机、双盲试验(TARGET)的结果。

Ceftobiprole Compared With Vancomycin Plus Aztreonam in the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections: Results of a Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Trial (TARGET).

机构信息

eStudySite Clinical Research, San Diego, California, USA.

Physician Alliance Research Center, Anaheim, California, USA.

出版信息

Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Oct 5;73(7):e1507-e1517. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa974.

DOI:10.1093/cid/ciaa974
PMID:32897367
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8492220/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The development of novel broad-spectrum antibiotics, with efficacy against both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, has the potential to enhance treatment options for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs). Ceftobiprole is an advanced-generation intravenous cephalosporin with broad in vitro activity against gram-positive (including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus) and gram-negative pathogens.

METHODS

TARGET was a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter, phase 3 noninferiority study that compared ceftobiprole with vancomycin plus aztreonam. The Food and Drug Administration-defined primary efficacy endpoint was early clinical response 48-72 hours after treatment initiation in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population and the European Medicines Agency-defined primary endpoint was investigator-assessed clinical success at the test-of-cure (TOC) visit. Noninferiority was defined as the lower limit of the 95% CI for the difference in success rates (ceftobiprole minus vancomycin/aztreonam) >-10%. Safety was assessed through adverse event and laboratory data collection.

RESULTS

In total, 679 patients were randomized to ceftobiprole (n = 335) or vancomycin/aztreonam (n = 344). Early clinical success rates were 91.3% and 88.1% in the ceftobiprole and vancomycin/aztreonam groups, respectively, and noninferiority was demonstrated (adjusted difference: 3.3%; 95% CI: -1.2, 7.8). Investigator-assessed clinical success at the TOC visit was similar between the 2 groups, and noninferiority was demonstrated for both the ITT (90.1% vs 89.0%) and clinically evaluable (97.9% vs 95.2%) populations. Both treatment groups displayed similar microbiological success and safety profiles.

CONCLUSIONS

TARGET demonstrated that ceftobiprole is noninferior to vancomycin/aztreonam in the treatment of ABSSSIs, in terms of early clinical response and investigator-assessed clinical success at the TOC visit.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

NCT03137173.

摘要

背景

新型广谱抗生素的开发具有治疗革兰阳性和革兰阴性细菌感染的功效,有可能为急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染(ABSSSIs)的治疗提供更多选择。头孢托罗匹酯是一种具有广泛体外活性的新型第四代头孢菌素,对革兰阳性菌(包括耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌)和革兰阴性病原体均有作用。

方法

TARGET 是一项随机、双盲、阳性对照、平行分组、多中心、III 期非劣效性研究,比较头孢托罗匹酯与万古霉素加氨曲南的疗效。美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)定义的主要疗效终点是意向治疗(ITT)人群中治疗开始后 48-72 小时的早期临床反应,欧洲药品管理局(EMA)定义的主要终点是治愈测试(TOC)时研究者评估的临床成功率。非劣效性定义为疗效(头孢托罗匹酯减去万古霉素/氨曲南)成功率差异的 95%置信区间下限(CL)>-10%。通过不良事件和实验室数据收集评估安全性。

结果

共 679 例患者随机分为头孢托罗匹酯(n=335)或万古霉素/氨曲南(n=344)组。头孢托罗匹酯组和万古霉素/氨曲南组的早期临床成功率分别为 91.3%和 88.1%,且均显示非劣效性(校正差异:3.3%;95%CI:-1.2,7.8)。在 TOC 时,两组的临床成功率相似,且在 ITT(90.1%vs89.0%)和临床可评估人群(97.9%vs95.2%)中均显示非劣效性。两组治疗均具有相似的微生物学疗效和安全性。

结论

TARGET 研究表明,在治疗 ABSSSIs 方面,头孢托罗匹酯与万古霉素/氨曲南相比,早期临床反应和 TOC 时的临床成功率无差异。

临床试验注册

NCT03137173。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1658/8492220/35fa6d9f0b60/ciaa974f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1658/8492220/4eeebd30ec0c/ciaa974f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1658/8492220/a251c3496d66/ciaa974f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1658/8492220/9013eefa371d/ciaa974f0003a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1658/8492220/35fa6d9f0b60/ciaa974f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1658/8492220/4eeebd30ec0c/ciaa974f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1658/8492220/a251c3496d66/ciaa974f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1658/8492220/9013eefa371d/ciaa974f0003a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1658/8492220/35fa6d9f0b60/ciaa974f0004.jpg

相似文献

1
Ceftobiprole Compared With Vancomycin Plus Aztreonam in the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections: Results of a Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Trial (TARGET).头孢托罗匹酯与万古霉素加氨曲南治疗急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染的比较:一项 3 期、随机、双盲试验(TARGET)的结果。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Oct 5;73(7):e1507-e1517. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa974.
2
A Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Followed by Oral Delafloxacin With Vancomycin Plus Aztreonam for the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections: A Phase 3, Multinational, Double-Blind, Randomized Study.静脉注射后序贯口服多氟喹诺酮与万古霉素联合氨曲南治疗急性细菌性皮肤及皮肤结构感染的疗效和安全性比较:一项 3 期、多国、双盲、随机研究。
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Aug 16;67(5):657-666. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy165.
3
Ceftaroline fosamil in the treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia and acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections.头孢洛林酯治疗社区获得性细菌性肺炎和急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染。
Drugs. 2012 Jul 30;72(11):1473-93. doi: 10.2165/11635660-000000000-00000.
4
Results of a double-blind, randomized trial of ceftobiprole treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections caused by gram-positive bacteria.头孢比普治疗革兰氏阳性菌引起的复杂皮肤及皮肤结构感染的双盲随机试验结果
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008 Jan;52(1):37-44. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00551-07. Epub 2007 Oct 22.
5
A randomized, double-blind trial comparing ceftobiprole medocaril with vancomycin plus ceftazidime for the treatment of patients with complicated skin and skin-structure infections.一项比较头孢托罗培南与万古霉素加头孢他啶治疗复杂性皮肤及皮肤结构感染患者的随机双盲试验。
Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Mar 1;46(5):647-55. doi: 10.1086/526527.
6
CANVAS 1 and 2: analysis of clinical response at day 3 in two phase 3 trials of ceftaroline fosamil versus vancomycin plus aztreonam in treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections.CANVAS 1 和 2:头孢洛林酯氨噻肟与万古霉素加氨曲南治疗急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染的两项 3 期临床试验中第 3 天临床应答的分析。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012 May;56(5):2231-6. doi: 10.1128/AAC.05738-11. Epub 2012 Feb 6.
7
Ceftobiprole: a review of a broad-spectrum and anti-MRSA cephalosporin.头孢比普:一种广谱抗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌头孢菌素的综述。
Am J Clin Dermatol. 2008;9(4):245-54. doi: 10.2165/00128071-200809040-00004.
8
Integrated safety summary of CANVAS 1 and 2 trials: Phase III, randomized, double-blind studies evaluating ceftaroline fosamil for the treatment of patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections.CANVAS 1 和 2 试验的综合安全性总结:III 期、随机、双盲研究,评估头孢洛林酯治疗复杂性皮肤和皮肤结构感染患者。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010 Nov;65 Suppl 4:iv67-iv71. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkq256.
9
Single-dose oritavancin versus 7-10 days of vancomycin in the treatment of gram-positive acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections: the SOLO II noninferiority study.单剂奥塔万古霉素与 7-10 天万古霉素治疗革兰阳性急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染:SOLO II 非劣效性研究。
Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Jan 15;60(2):254-62. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu778. Epub 2014 Oct 6.
10
Ceftobiprole: a novel cephalosporin with activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).头孢比普:一种新型头孢菌素,对革兰氏阳性和革兰氏阴性病原体均有活性,包括耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2009 Jul;34(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2008.12.012. Epub 2009 Mar 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Nephrotoxicity of New Antibiotics: A Systematic Review.新型抗生素的肾毒性:一项系统评价
Toxics. 2025 Jul 19;13(7):606. doi: 10.3390/toxics13070606.
2
A year in pharmacology: new drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2024.药理学的一年:2024年美国食品药品监督管理局批准的新药
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2025 May;398(5):5077-5099. doi: 10.1007/s00210-025-04020-2. Epub 2025 Mar 31.
3
Impact of obesity on clinical outcomes in patients treated with ceftobiprole: results from Phase 3 clinical trials.

本文引用的文献

1
Current Treatment Options for Acute Skin and Skin-structure Infections.急性皮肤和皮肤结构感染的治疗选择。
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Apr 8;68(Suppl 3):S206-S212. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz004.
2
Current Epidemiology, Etiology, and Burden of Acute Skin Infections in the United States.目前美国急性皮肤感染的流行病学、病因和负担。
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Apr 8;68(Suppl 3):S193-S199. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz002.
3
Ceftobiprole activity when tested against contemporary bacteria causing bloodstream infections in the United States (2016-2017).
肥胖对接受头孢比普治疗患者临床结局的影响:3期临床试验结果
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2025 Mar 28;80(6):1526-34. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkaf096.
4
Towards a holistic approach to pulmonary infections. Insights from the Sixth Annual Meeting of Spanish Experts 2024.迈向肺部感染的整体治疗方法。来自2024年西班牙专家第六届年会的见解。
Rev Esp Quimioter. 2025 Mar 27;38(3):152-186. doi: 10.37201/req/017.2025.
5
Efficacy and Safety of Vancomycin, Linezolid, and Ceftaroline in the Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.万古霉素、利奈唑胺和头孢洛林治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)的疗效和安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cureus. 2025 Jan 25;17(1):e77949. doi: 10.7759/cureus.77949. eCollection 2025 Jan.
6
Synthesis and evaluation of in vitro antioxidant, anticancer, and antibacterial properties of new benzylideneiminophenylthiazole analogues.新型亚苄基亚氨基苯基噻唑类似物的体外抗氧化、抗癌和抗菌性能的合成与评价
BMC Chem. 2024 Sep 17;18(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s13065-024-01273-5.
7
Treatment of MRSA Infection: Where are We?耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌感染的治疗:我们在哪里?
Curr Med Chem. 2024;31(28):4425-4460. doi: 10.2174/0109298673249381231130111352.
8
Ceft-to-Ceft Study: Real-Life Experience with Ceftaroline and Ceftobiprole in Treatment of the Principal Infectious Syndromes in a Spanish Multicenter Hospital Cohort.头孢洛林与头孢比普的对比研究:西班牙多中心医院队列中头孢洛林和头孢比普治疗主要感染综合征的真实生活经验
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Dec 2;12(12):1692. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12121692.
9
New Antimicrobials for Gram-Positive Sustained Infections: A Comprehensive Guide for Clinicians.用于革兰氏阳性持续性感染的新型抗菌药物:临床医生综合指南
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2023 Sep 15;16(9):1304. doi: 10.3390/ph16091304.
10
Ceftobiprole Medocaril Is an Effective Post-Exposure Treatment in the Fischer 344 Rat Model of Pneumonic Tularemia.头孢比普甲磺酸盐在费希尔344大鼠肺鼠疫模型中是一种有效的暴露后治疗药物。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Aug 19;12(8):1337. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12081337.
头孢洛林在对抗 2016-2017 年美国血流感染主要致病菌时的活性。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019 Jul;94(3):304-313. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2019.01.015. Epub 2019 Jan 26.
4
Economic burden of hospital admissions for patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections in the United States.美国急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染患者住院治疗的经济负担。
Hosp Pract (1995). 2018 Dec;46(5):278-286. doi: 10.1080/21548331.2018.1506673. Epub 2018 Aug 21.
5
Management of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections with a focus on patients at high risk of treatment failure.以治疗失败高风险患者为重点的急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染的管理。
Ther Adv Infect Dis. 2017 Sep;4(5):143-161. doi: 10.1177/2049936117723228. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
6
Comparative effectiveness of β-lactam versus vancomycin empiric therapy in patients with methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) bacteremia.β-内酰胺类与万古霉素经验性治疗对甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌(MSSA)菌血症患者的疗效比较
Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2016 Apr 26;15:27. doi: 10.1186/s12941-016-0143-3.
7
Rising United States Hospital Admissions for Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections: Recent Trends and Economic Impact.美国急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染住院人数上升:近期趋势及经济影响
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 24;10(11):e0143276. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143276. eCollection 2015.
8
Comparative effectiveness of beta-lactams versus vancomycin for treatment of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections among 122 hospitals.β-内酰胺类药物与万古霉素治疗 122 家医院耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌血流感染的疗效比较。
Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Aug 1;61(3):361-7. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ308. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
9
Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of skin and soft tissue infections: 2014 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America.皮肤和软组织感染诊断与管理实践指南:美国传染病学会 2014 年更新版。
Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Jul 15;59(2):e10-52. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu444.
10
A phase 3 randomized double-blind comparison of ceftobiprole medocaril versus ceftazidime plus linezolid for the treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia.头孢比普甲磺酸盐与头孢他啶加利奈唑胺治疗医院获得性肺炎的3期随机双盲对照试验
Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Jul 1;59(1):51-61. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu219. Epub 2014 Apr 9.