Suppr超能文献

新型抗生素的肾毒性:一项系统评价

Nephrotoxicity of New Antibiotics: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Stathopoulos Panagiotis, Romanos Laura T, Loutradis Charalampos, Falagas Matthew E

机构信息

Alfa Institute of Biomedical Sciences, 9 Neapoleos Street, Marousi, 151 23 Athens, Greece.

School of Medicine, European University Cyprus, 6 Diogenous Str., Egkomi, Nicosia 2404, Cyprus.

出版信息

Toxics. 2025 Jul 19;13(7):606. doi: 10.3390/toxics13070606.

Abstract

Drug-induced nephrotoxicity is a common and serious problem in clinical practice. We conducted a systematic review of studies reporting nephrotoxicity events associated with antibiotics approved since 2018. The agents assessed included aztreonam/avibactam, cefepime/enmetazobactam, cefiderocol, ceftobiprole, contezolid, gepotidacin, imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam, lascufloxacin, lefamulin, levonadifloxacin, plazomicin, and sulbactam/durlobactam. Literature searches were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and major pharmacovigilance databases (Vigibase, FAERS, EudraVigilance, EMA, FDA, NMPA, PMDA, and CDSCO) in May 2025, along with reference citation tracking. Studies were included if they reported safety or adverse event data. The risk of bias was assessed using validated tools in accordance with the study design. Out of 2105 potentially relevant records, 74 studies met inclusion criteria, comprising 52 clinical trials, 17 observational studies, 1 registry-based study, 3 case series, and 1 case report. Nephrotoxicity was rarely reported for any of the newly approved antibiotics. No renal adverse events were found in the available studies for aztreonam/avibactam, levonadifloxacin, and contezolid. Most studies were of moderate to high quality; two were classified as low quality. However, nephrotoxicity was inconsistently assessed, with variable definitions and methodologies used. Although current data suggest a low frequency of nephrotoxicity, limitations in study design and reporting preclude firm conclusions. There is a need for post-marketing studies to better characterize renal safety. Clinicians should remain vigilant and continue to monitor for and report renal-related adverse events.

摘要

药物性肾毒性是临床实践中常见且严重的问题。我们对报告自2018年以来获批抗生素相关肾毒性事件的研究进行了系统综述。评估的药物包括氨曲南/阿维巴坦、头孢吡肟/恩美他唑巴坦、头孢地尔、头孢托罗、康替唑胺、吉派达星、亚胺培南/西司他丁/瑞巴坦、拉舒沙星、莱法莫林、左氧那氟沙星、普拉佐米星和舒巴坦/度洛巴坦。2025年5月在PubMed、Scopus、科学网以及主要的药物警戒数据库(Vigibase、FAERS、EudraVigilance、EMA、FDA、NMPA、PMDA和CDSCO)中进行了文献检索,并追踪参考文献引用情况。如果研究报告了安全性或不良事件数据,则纳入研究。根据研究设计,使用经过验证的工具评估偏倚风险。在2105条潜在相关记录中,74项研究符合纳入标准,包括52项临床试验、17项观察性研究、1项基于登记处的研究、3个病例系列和1例病例报告。对于任何一种新获批的抗生素,肾毒性报告都很少。在氨曲南/阿维巴坦、左氧那氟沙星和康替唑胺的现有研究中未发现肾脏不良事件。大多数研究质量为中等至高;两项被归类为低质量。然而,肾毒性的评估并不一致,使用的定义和方法各不相同。尽管目前的数据表明肾毒性发生率较低,但研究设计和报告方面的局限性使得无法得出确凿结论。需要进行上市后研究以更好地描述肾脏安全性。临床医生应保持警惕,继续监测并报告与肾脏相关的不良事件。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b9d/12299473/001137240ea4/toxics-13-00606-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验