Stevenson M R, Black K N
Department of Psychological Science, Ball State University, Muncie, IN 47306.
Child Dev. 1988 Jun;59(3):793-814. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1988.tb03236.x.
A meta-analysis was based on every available study that has compared father-present and father-absent children on a measure of sex typing. 67 studies produced 222 estimates of effect size. Owing to the inappropriateness of conventional statistics, Hedges's approach to meta-analysis was employed. Results show that published studies produced larger estimates of effect size than dissertations and conference papers. Effect-size estimates based on clinical and incarcerated samples were significantly different from those based on more typical samples. Generalizable differences between father-present and father-absent females were conspicuously absent. Preschool father-absent boys were shown to make less stereotypical choices of toys and activities when compared to father-present age-mates. When compared to father-present boys, older father-absent boys were more stereotypical in their overt behavior, particularly in terms of aggression. Discussion focused on interpretation of the results within a multidimensional conception of sex role.
一项荟萃分析基于每一项可获取的、在性别角色测量方面对有父亲陪伴和无父亲陪伴的孩子进行比较的研究。67项研究得出了222个效应量估计值。由于传统统计方法不合适,采用了赫奇斯的荟萃分析方法。结果表明,已发表的研究比学位论文和会议论文得出的效应量估计值更大。基于临床样本和监禁样本的效应量估计值与基于更典型样本的估计值有显著差异。有父亲陪伴和无父亲陪伴的女性之间没有明显的普遍差异。与有父亲陪伴的同龄男孩相比,无父亲陪伴的学龄前男孩在玩具和活动选择上的刻板程度较低。与有父亲陪伴的男孩相比,年龄较大的无父亲陪伴男孩在公开行为上更刻板,尤其是在攻击性方面。讨论集中在性别角色多维概念框架内对结果的解释。