Tasaki Yutaro, Sueyoshi Eijun, Takamatsu Hiroko, Matsushima Yoshifumi, Miyamura Shuto, Sakamoto Ichiro, Mochizuki Yasushi, Uetani Masataka
Department of Radiological Science, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences.
Division of Blood Purification, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Sep 4;99(36):e21890. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021890.
The outcomes of carbon dioxide digital subtraction angiography (CO2-DSA) for performing percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty (balloon PTA) in hemodialysis patients has not been fully clarified. The purpose was to compare the outcomes of balloon PTA of hemodialysis shunts in terms of vessel patency between patients treated using CO2-DSA and conventional digital subtraction angiography using iodine contrast medium (C-DSA).We retrospectively evaluated 76 patients (38 males and 38 females, mean age: 65.0 ± 14.0 years). They were under hemodialysis and treated with balloon PTA using CO2-DSA or C-DSA at our institution between 2009 and 2016. Mean duration of the follow-up period was 25.59 ± 21.45 months. We compared the patency rates obtained after CO2-DSA-based balloon PTA with those after C-DSA-based balloon PTA. Secondary patency, which was defined as the duration of patency after all further endovascular interventions until surgical repair, was considered as the endpoint in this study.Overall, 19 and 57 patients underwent CO2-DSA- and C-DSA-based balloon PTA, respectively. CO2-DSA- and C-DSA-based balloon PTA produced clinical success rates of 100% and 96.5%, respectively. Blood vessel injury occurred in one patient who underwent C-DSA-based balloon PTA. No major complications occurred in CO2 group. At 24 months, the post-PTA secondary patency rates of CO2-DSA- and C-DSA-based balloon PTA were 94.1% and 93.9%, respectively (P = .9594).CO2-DSA is safe for hemodialysis patients. Compared with C-DSA, CO2-DSA-based balloon PTA produces have a similar secondary patency rate.
二氧化碳数字减影血管造影(CO2-DSA)用于血液透析患者经皮腔内球囊血管成形术(球囊PTA)的效果尚未完全明确。目的是比较使用CO2-DSA和使用碘造影剂的传统数字减影血管造影(C-DSA)治疗的患者在血液透析分流球囊PTA方面血管通畅性的效果。我们回顾性评估了76例患者(男性38例,女性38例,平均年龄:65.0±14.0岁)。他们接受血液透析,并于2009年至2016年在我们机构接受了使用CO2-DSA或C-DSA的球囊PTA治疗。平均随访期为25.59±21.45个月。我们比较了基于CO2-DSA的球囊PTA和基于C-DSA的球囊PTA后的通畅率。二次通畅定义为在所有进一步的血管内干预直至手术修复后的通畅持续时间,在本研究中被视为终点。总体而言,分别有19例和57例患者接受了基于CO2-DSA和C-DSA的球囊PTA。基于CO2-DSA和C-DSA的球囊PTA的临床成功率分别为100%和96.5%。1例接受基于C-DSA的球囊PTA的患者发生了血管损伤。CO2组未发生重大并发症。在24个月时,基于CO2-DSA和C-DSA的球囊PTA的PTA后二次通畅率分别为94.1%和93.9%(P = 0.9594)。CO2-DSA对血液透析患者是安全的。与C-DSA相比,基于CO2-DSA的球囊PTA产生的二次通畅率相似。