• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

A comparison of felodipine and propranolol as additions to hydrochlorothiazide in the treatment of hypertension.

作者信息

Carle W K, Latta D, Lees C T, Lough J R, Pender J, Ross J R, Sefton S, Peers E M, Richardson P D

机构信息

Airdrie Health Centre, Lanarkshire, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1988;34(2):115-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00614545.

DOI:10.1007/BF00614545
PMID:3289947
Abstract

Eighty one patients with uncomplicated hypertension who required additional antihypertensive medication (diastolic Phase V [dBP] greater than or equal to 95 mm Hg) after 4 weeks treatment with hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25 mg o.m. were randomized to receive felodipine 5 mg b.i.d. (n = 40) or propranolol (n = 41) 80 mg b.i.d. in addition to HCTZ 25 mg o.m. If the dBP measured about 12 h post-dose was not less than or equal to 90 mm Hg after 4 weeks, the dose of felodipine or propranolol was doubled. The double blind trial period was 8 weeks for all patients. Over the 8 week period, felodipine reduced the seated dBP from 100 to 83 mm Hg and propranolol from 101 to 86 mm Hg. The attained seated dBPs were significantly different in the two groups. About one third of patients in each group received the high dose of second-line therapy. After 8 weeks 91% of patients receiving HCTZ+felodipine and 84% receiving HCTZ+propranolol had a dBP less than or equal to 90 mm Hg. Both regimens were well-tolerated with an equal incidence but different pattern of adverse events (felodipine: flushing, headache and peripheral oedema; propranolol: dyspepsia, fatigue and vasospasm). In this 8-week study, felodipine and propranolol were safe and effective second-line antihypertensive drugs when added to hydrochlorothiazide. At the doses selected, felodipine was at least as effective as propranolol.

摘要

相似文献

1
A comparison of felodipine and propranolol as additions to hydrochlorothiazide in the treatment of hypertension.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1988;34(2):115-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00614545.
2
A double-blind comparison of felodipine and hydrochlorothiazide added to metoprolol to control hypertension.非洛地平与氢氯噻嗪加用美托洛尔治疗高血压的双盲对照研究。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1988;34(1):21-4. doi: 10.1007/BF01061411.
3
Control of hypertension in elderly patients with felodipine and metoprolol: a double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.非洛地平与美托洛尔对老年高血压患者的控制:一项双盲、安慰剂对照临床试验。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1987 Oct;24(4):459-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1987.tb03198.x.
4
Felodipine versus Moduretic. A double-blind parallel-group multicentre study.
Drugs. 1987;34 Suppl 3:162-9. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198700343-00035.
5
Felodipine versus prazosin as an addition to a beta-blocker in the treatment of essential hypertension. The Australian Multicentre Study.非洛地平与哌唑嗪作为β受体阻滞剂辅助药物治疗原发性高血压的疗效比较。澳大利亚多中心研究。
Drugs. 1987;34 Suppl 3:109-19. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198700343-00025.
6
Felodipine, a new calcium antagonist, as monotherapy in mild or moderate hypertension. Cooperative study group.非洛地平,一种新型钙拮抗剂,用于轻度或中度高血压的单一疗法。合作研究组。
Drugs. 1987;34 Suppl 3:139-48. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198700343-00030.
7
Efficacy and safety of losartan/hydrochlorothiazide in patients with severe hypertension.氯沙坦/氢氯噻嗪治疗重度高血压患者的疗效与安全性
Am J Cardiol. 2001 Mar 15;87(6):721-6. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(00)01490-9.
8
Antihypertensive therapy with nitrendipine: comparison with hydrochlorothiazide and propranolol.尼群地平的抗高血压治疗:与氢氯噻嗪和普萘洛尔的比较。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1988;12 Suppl 4:S55-8.
9
Efficacy and tolerability of combination therapy with valsartan plus hydrochlorothiazide compared with amlodipine monotherapy in hypertensive patients with other cardiovascular risk factors: the VAST study.缬沙坦联合氢氯噻嗪与氨氯地平单药治疗对伴有其他心血管危险因素的高血压患者的疗效及耐受性比较:VAST研究
Clin Ther. 2005 May;27(5):578-87. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.05.006.
10
Isradipine vs propranolol in hydrochlorothiazide-treated hypertensives. A multicenter evaluation.伊拉地平与普萘洛尔治疗氢氯噻嗪控制的高血压患者的多中心评估
Arch Intern Med. 1989 Nov;149(11):2453-7.

引用本文的文献

1
The antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of a low dose combination of ramipril and felodipine ER in mild to moderate essential hypertension.雷米普利与缓释非洛地平低剂量联合用药治疗轻至中度原发性高血压的降压疗效及耐受性
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1993 Oct;36(4):323-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1993.tb00371.x.
2
Felodipine. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in hypertension.非洛地平。对其药效学和药代动力学特性以及在高血压治疗中的应用的综述。
Drugs. 1988 Oct;36(4):387-428. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198836040-00002.
3
Comparison of once daily felodipine 10 mg ER and hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension.

本文引用的文献

1
Haemodynamic effects of a new vasodilator drug, felodipine, in healthy subjects.新型血管扩张剂非洛地平对健康受试者的血流动力学影响。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1983;24(1):49-53. doi: 10.1007/BF00613926.
2
Felodipine--a new vasodilator, in addition to beta-receptor blockade in hypertension.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1983;25(5):571-5. doi: 10.1007/BF00542340.
3
Treatment of essential hypertension with felodipine in combination with a diuretic.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1986;30(2):133-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00614290.
4
每日一次服用10毫克非洛地平缓释片与25毫克氢氯噻嗪治疗轻至中度高血压的比较。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1991;41(3):197-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00315429.
Felodipine vs hydralazine: a controlled trial as third line therapy in hypertension. Cooperative Study Group.非洛地平与肼屈嗪对比:作为高血压三线治疗的对照试验。合作研究组
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1986 Jun;21(6):621-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1986.tb05225.x.