• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非洛地平与氢氯噻嗪加用美托洛尔治疗高血压的双盲对照研究。

A double-blind comparison of felodipine and hydrochlorothiazide added to metoprolol to control hypertension.

作者信息

Groom P, Simpson R J, Singh B, Ward D E, Peers E, Richardson P D

机构信息

Forth Valley GP Research Group, Department of Psychology, University of Stirling, Scotland.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1988;34(1):21-4. doi: 10.1007/BF01061411.

DOI:10.1007/BF01061411
PMID:3282893
Abstract

Seventy-six uncomplicated hypertensive patients treated in General Practice, whose seated diastolic blood pressure (Phase V) (dBP) remained greater than or equal to 95 mmHg after a minimum of 4 weeks treatment with metoprolol 50 mg b.i.d. as antihypertensive monotherapy, were randomized to receive the selective 'calcium antagonist' felodipine 5 mg b.i.d. or hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg b.i.d. in addition to metoprolol 50 mg b.i.d. The trial duration was 8 weeks, the dose of the felodipine or hydrochlorothiazide being doubled after 4 weeks if 'control' of BP (dBP less than 90 mmHg) was not achieved on the initial doses. Over the trial period of 8 weeks, felodipine reduced dBP from 102 to 85 mmHg and hydrochlorothiazide from 101 to 91 mmHg; the dBP reduction in the felodipine group was greater than that in the hydrochlorothiazide group (17 vs 9 mmHg) and the attained dBP lower in the felodipine group. About half of the patients in each group required the higher dose. Both regimes were effective and well tolerated. In the dosages used, felodipine was a slightly more effective antihypertensive drug than hydrochlorothiazide when added to metoprolol. There was no apparent difference in the tolerability of the two regimes.

摘要

76例在全科医疗中接受治疗的单纯性高血压患者,在使用美托洛尔50毫克每日两次作为抗高血压单一疗法进行至少4周治疗后,其坐位舒张压(第五期)(dBP)仍大于或等于95毫米汞柱,被随机分配接受选择性“钙拮抗剂”非洛地平5毫克每日两次或氢氯噻嗪12.5毫克每日两次,同时继续使用美托洛尔50毫克每日两次。试验为期8周,如果初始剂量未能实现血压“控制”(dBP小于90毫米汞柱),则在4周后将非洛地平或氢氯噻嗪的剂量加倍。在8周的试验期内,非洛地平使dBP从102毫米汞柱降至85毫米汞柱,氢氯噻嗪使其从101毫米汞柱降至91毫米汞柱;非洛地平组的dBP降幅大于氢氯噻嗪组(分别为17毫米汞柱和9毫米汞柱),且非洛地平组达到的dBP更低。每组约一半的患者需要更高剂量。两种治疗方案均有效且耐受性良好。在所使用的剂量下,非洛地平与美托洛尔联用时作为抗高血压药物比氢氯噻嗪稍有效。两种治疗方案的耐受性没有明显差异。

相似文献

1
A double-blind comparison of felodipine and hydrochlorothiazide added to metoprolol to control hypertension.非洛地平与氢氯噻嗪加用美托洛尔治疗高血压的双盲对照研究。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1988;34(1):21-4. doi: 10.1007/BF01061411.
2
A comparison of felodipine and propranolol as additions to hydrochlorothiazide in the treatment of hypertension.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1988;34(2):115-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00614545.
3
Control of hypertension in elderly patients with felodipine and metoprolol: a double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.非洛地平与美托洛尔对老年高血压患者的控制:一项双盲、安慰剂对照临床试验。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1987 Oct;24(4):459-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1987.tb03198.x.
4
Combination therapy with felodipine and metoprolol compared with captopril and hydrochlorothiazide. German MC Study Group.非洛地平与美托洛尔联合治疗与卡托普利和氢氯噻嗪的比较。德国MC研究小组。
Blood Press. 1998 Nov;7(5-6):308-12. doi: 10.1080/080370598437178.
5
Hypertension in the elderly. Its diagnosis in general practice and treatment with felodipine and metoprolol.老年人高血压。其在全科医疗中的诊断以及使用非洛地平和美托洛尔的治疗。
Drugs. 1987;34 Suppl 3:149-50. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198700343-00031.
6
Cost-effectiveness of nitrendipine and hydrochlorothiazide or metoprolol to treat hypertension in rural community health centers in China.在中国农村社区卫生中心使用硝苯地平与氢氯噻嗪或美托洛尔治疗高血压的成本效益
J Hypertens. 2017 Apr;35(4):886-892. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001209.
7
Comparison of felodipine and hydrochlorothiazide for the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension in black Africans.非洛地平与氢氯噻嗪治疗非洲黑人轻度至中度高血压的比较。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1990;15 Suppl 4:S91-3. doi: 10.1097/00005344-199015004-00028.
8
Felodipine versus Moduretic. A double-blind parallel-group multicentre study.
Drugs. 1987;34 Suppl 3:162-9. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198700343-00035.
9
The Felodipine Event Reduction (FEVER) Study: a randomized long-term placebo-controlled trial in Chinese hypertensive patients.非洛地平降压疗效和安全性研究(FEVER):一项针对中国高血压患者的随机、长期、安慰剂对照试验。
J Hypertens. 2005 Dec;23(12):2157-72. doi: 10.1097/01.hjh.0000194120.42722.ac.
10
Antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of a new once-daily felodipine-metoprolol combination compared with each component alone. The Swedish/UK Study Group.一种新型每日一次非洛地平-美托洛尔复方制剂与单一组分相比的降压疗效及耐受性。瑞典/英国研究小组。
Blood Press Suppl. 1993;1:22-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Felodipine/metoprolol: a review of the fixed dose controlled release formulation in the management of essential hypertension.非洛地平/美托洛尔:关于固定剂量控释制剂治疗原发性高血压的综述
Drugs. 2000 Jan;59(1):141-57. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200059010-00011.
2
Felodipine. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in hypertension.非洛地平。对其药效学和药代动力学特性以及在高血压治疗中的应用的综述。
Drugs. 1988 Oct;36(4):387-428. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198836040-00002.
3
Control of blood pressure in hypertensive patients with felodipine extended release or nifedipine retard.

本文引用的文献

1
Haemodynamic effects of a new vasodilator drug, felodipine, in healthy subjects.新型血管扩张剂非洛地平对健康受试者的血流动力学影响。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1983;24(1):49-53. doi: 10.1007/BF00613926.
2
Acute haemodynamic effects of felodipine during beta blockade in patients with coronary artery disease.非洛地平在冠状动脉疾病患者β受体阻滞剂治疗期间的急性血流动力学效应
Br Heart J. 1984 Oct;52(4):431-4. doi: 10.1136/hrt.52.4.431.
3
Felodipine--a new vasodilator, in addition to beta-receptor blockade in hypertension.
用非洛地平缓释片或硝苯地平缓释片控制高血压患者的血压
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1990 Dec;30(6):871-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1990.tb05453.x.
4
Comparison of once daily felodipine 10 mg ER and hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension.每日一次服用10毫克非洛地平缓释片与25毫克氢氯噻嗪治疗轻至中度高血压的比较。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1991;41(3):197-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00315429.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1983;25(5):571-5. doi: 10.1007/BF00542340.
4
Felodipine vs hydralazine: a controlled trial as third line therapy in hypertension. Cooperative Study Group.非洛地平与肼屈嗪对比:作为高血压三线治疗的对照试验。合作研究组
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1986 Jun;21(6):621-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1986.tb05225.x.
5
MRC trial of treatment of mild hypertension: principal results. Medical Research Council Working Party.医学研究委员会轻度高血压治疗试验:主要结果。医学研究委员会工作组
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985 Jul 13;291(6488):97-104. doi: 10.1136/bmj.291.6488.97.