Sharma Ramakant, Jain Nakul, Lee Hyunwoo, Kabra Dinesh, Yoo Seunghyup
Department of Electrical Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon 34141, Republic of Korea.
Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai 400076, India.
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020 Oct 7;12(40):45083-45091. doi: 10.1021/acsami.0c13579. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
In this work, a unique comprehensive and comparative analysis of photoinduced charge generation, recombination kinetics, and energy losses has been carried out to study the effect of different fullerene-based acceptors (FBAs) and nonfullerene acceptors (NFAs) on the performance of organic solar cells (OSCs). For this, different FBAs, specifically ICBA, PC60BM, and PC70BM, and NFAs, namely, ITIC, IT-4F, and IEICO-4F, were employed independently along with a particular donor polymer, PBDB-T, to fabricate bulk heterojunction OSCs and their performances have been compared. This donor molecule is known to give similar power conversion efficiency (PCE) with FBAs and NFAs and hence is ideal for comparative studies. The origin of the higher PCE of NFA-based OSCs vs FBA-based OSCs is analyzed in terms of spectral coverage, charge generation, recombination, and energy loss. It is found that the energy loss (Δ) is ∼0.8 to 1 eV for FBA-based OSCs, while it is 0.5-0.7 eV for NFA-based OSCs. Interestingly, for the PBDB-T:IEICO-4F-based system, energy losses due to charge generation (Δ) are ∼0 eV and therefore this system has minimum Δ among all of the studied devices. Providing a systematic, comprehensive, and comparative outlook, our study may further be extended to new upcoming NFA systems and beyond the donor system used in this work.
在这项工作中,我们对光生电荷产生、复合动力学和能量损失进行了独特的全面比较分析,以研究不同的基于富勒烯的受体(FBA)和非富勒烯受体(NFA)对有机太阳能电池(OSC)性能的影响。为此,我们分别使用了不同的FBA,具体为ICBA、PC60BM和PC70BM,以及NFA,即ITIC、IT-4F和IEICO-4F,并与一种特定的供体聚合物PBDB-T一起制备了体异质结OSC,并比较了它们的性能。已知这种供体分子与FBA和NFA具有相似的功率转换效率(PCE),因此是进行比较研究的理想选择。我们从光谱覆盖范围、电荷产生、复合和能量损失等方面分析了基于NFA的OSC比基于FBA的OSC具有更高PCE的原因。结果发现,基于FBA的OSC的能量损失(Δ)约为0.8至1 eV,而基于NFA的OSC的能量损失为0.5 - 0.7 eV。有趣的是,对于基于PBDB-T:IEICO-4F的体系,电荷产生导致的能量损失(Δ)约为0 eV,因此该体系在所有研究的器件中具有最小的Δ。我们的研究提供了一个系统、全面和比较性的视角,可能会进一步扩展到新出现的NFA体系以及超出本工作中使用的供体体系。