Suppr超能文献

“激励性工作”:普通实践中预防性健康对话的定性研究。

'Motivational work': a qualitative study of preventive health dialogues in general practice.

机构信息

National Institute of Public Health, Research Program on Health and Social Conditions, University of Southern Denmark, Studiestræde 6, 1455, Copenhagen K, Denmark.

The Danish Centre for Urban Regeneration and Community Development, Hvidovre, Denmark.

出版信息

BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Sep 8;21(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01249-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this article is to explore preventive health dialogues in general practice in the context of a pilot study of a Danish primary preventive intervention 'TOF' (a Danish acronym for 'Early Detection and Prevention') carried out in 2016. The intervention consisted of 1) a stratification of patients into one of four groups, 2) a digital support system for both general practitioners and patients, 3) an individual digital health profile for each patient, and 4) targeted preventive services in either general practice or a municipal health center.

METHODS

The empirical material in this study was obtained through 10 observations of preventive health dialogues conducted in general practices and 18 semi-structured interviews with patients and general practitioners. We used the concept of 'motivational work' as an analytical lens for understanding preventive health dialogues in general practice from the perspectives of both general practitioners and patients.

RESULTS

While the health dialogues in TOF sought to reveal patients' motivations, understandings, and priorities related to health behavior, we find that the dialogues were treatment-oriented and structured around biomedical facts, numeric standards, and risk factor guidance. Overall, we find that numeric standards and quantification of motivation lessens the dialogue and interaction between General Practitioner and patient and that contextual factors relating to the intervention framework, such as a digital support system, the general practitioners' perceptions of their professional position as well as the patients' understanding of prevention -in an interplay-diminished the motivational work carried out in the health dialogues.

CONCLUSION

The findings show that the influence of different kinds of context adds to the complexity of prevention in the clinical encounter which help to explain why motivational work is difficult in general practice.

摘要

背景

本文旨在探讨一般实践中的预防健康对话,这是在 2016 年进行的丹麦初级预防干预“TOF”(丹麦语“早期发现和预防”的首字母缩写)试点研究的背景下进行的。该干预措施包括 1)将患者分为四组之一,2)为全科医生和患者提供数字支持系统,3)为每位患者提供个人数字健康档案,以及 4)在全科医生或市立卫生中心提供有针对性的预防服务。

方法

本研究的实证材料是通过在全科医生诊所进行的 10 次预防健康对话观察和 18 次与患者和全科医生的半结构化访谈获得的。我们使用“动机工作”的概念作为分析工具,从全科医生和患者的角度理解一般实践中的预防健康对话。

结果

虽然 TOF 中的健康对话旨在揭示患者与健康行为相关的动机、理解和优先事项,但我们发现这些对话是针对治疗的,围绕着生物医学事实、数字标准和危险因素指导。总体而言,我们发现数字标准和动机的量化减少了全科医生和患者之间的对话和互动,并且与干预框架相关的情境因素,例如数字支持系统、全科医生对其专业地位的看法以及患者对预防的理解——在相互作用中——减少了健康对话中的动机工作。

结论

研究结果表明,不同类型的背景的影响增加了临床环境中预防的复杂性,这有助于解释为什么在一般实践中动机工作很困难。

相似文献

4
The uses and implications of standards in general practice consultations.标准在全科医疗会诊中的应用及影响。
Health (London). 2017 Jan;21(1):3-20. doi: 10.1177/1363459315590245. Epub 2016 Jul 26.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验