Derksen Frans Awm, Olde Hartman Tim C, Bensing Jozien M, Lagro-Janssen Antoine Lm
Department of Primary and Community Care, Gender and Women's Health, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Br J Gen Pract. 2016 Dec;66(653):e887-e895. doi: 10.3399/bjgp16X687565. Epub 2016 Oct 10.
Current daily general practice has become increasingly technical and somatically oriented (where attention to patients' feelings is decreased) due to an increase in protocol-based guidelines. Priorities in GP-patient communication have shifted from a focus on listening and empathy to task-oriented communication.
To explore what barriers GPs experience when applying empathy in daily practice, and how these barriers are managed.
Thirty Dutch GPs with sufficient heterogeneity in sex, age, type of practice, and rural or urban setting were interviewed.
The consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) were applied. The verbatim transcripts were then analysed.
According to participating GPs, the current emphasis on protocol-driven care can be a significant barrier to genuineness in communication. Other potential barriers mentioned were time pressures and constraints, and dealing with patients displaying 'unruly behaviour' or those with personality disorders. GPs indicated that it can be difficult to balance emotional involvement and professional distance. Longer consulting times, smaller practice populations, and efficient practice organisation were described as practical solutions. In order to focus on a patient-as-person approach, GPs strongly suggested that deviating from guidelines should be possible when necessary as an element of good-quality care. Joining intercollegiate counselling groups was also discussed.
In addition to practical solutions for barriers to behaving empathically, GPs indicated that they needed more freedom to balance working with protocols and guidelines, as well as a patient-as-person and patient-as-partner approach. This balance is necessary to remain connected with patients and to deliver care that is truly personal.
由于基于协议的指南增多,当前的日常全科医疗实践变得越来越技术化且以躯体治疗为导向(对患者感受的关注减少)。全科医生与患者沟通的重点已从专注倾听和共情转向任务导向型沟通。
探讨全科医生在日常实践中运用共情时遇到哪些障碍,以及如何应对这些障碍。
对30名荷兰全科医生进行了访谈,这些医生在性别、年龄、执业类型以及城乡环境方面具有足够的异质性。
采用定性研究报告的统一标准(COREQ)。然后对逐字记录的访谈内容进行分析。
据参与访谈的全科医生称,当前对协议驱动型医疗的强调可能成为沟通中真诚性的重大障碍。提到的其他潜在障碍包括时间压力和限制,以及应对表现出“不守规矩行为”的患者或患有个性障碍的患者。全科医生表示,难以平衡情感投入和专业距离。更长的咨询时间、更少的执业人口以及高效的执业组织被描述为切实可行的解决办法。为了专注于以患者个体为中心的方法,全科医生强烈建议,作为优质医疗的一个要素,必要时应能够偏离指南。还讨论了加入校际咨询小组的问题。
除了针对共情行为障碍的切实可行的解决办法外,全科医生表示,他们需要更多自由来平衡遵循协议和指南开展工作,以及采用以患者个体和患者伙伴为中心的方法。这种平衡对于与患者保持联系并提供真正个性化的医疗服务是必要的。