Suppr超能文献

四种保守治疗方法对咀嚼肌痛伴下颌运动受限的即时反应比较:一项回顾性研究。

Comparison of immediate response to four conservative treatment modalities for management of masticatory myalgia with limited mandibular movement: a retrospective study.

作者信息

Yu Chun-Hua, Qian Hai-Xin, Sun Jian

出版信息

Quintessence Int. 2020;51(9):753-762. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a45102.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Conservative treatment modalities are recommended for managing masticatory myalgia in individuals with temporomandibular disorders. The aim of this study was to retrospectively review and compare the effectiveness of four conservative treatments: counseling and occlusal splint therapy, counseling and manipulation integrated with electrophysiotherapy, the combination of the two treatments, and counseling only.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

One hundred and sixty-eight patients who had myalgia with limited jaw movement were retrospectively observed in this study. Between January 2015 and December 2017, 63 patients received counseling and stabilization occlusal splint therapy (Group 1), 35 patients received counseling and manipulation integrated with electrophysiotherapy (Group 2), 33 patients received the combination of counseling, splint therapy, and manipulation integrated with electrophysiotherapy (Group 3), and 37 patients received counseling only (Group 4). All subjects were followed up for 12 weeks. The intensity of spontaneous pain, palpation pain, chewing pain in the masticatory muscles, and range of pain-free maximal mouth opening were recorded in the clinical assessments. Intragroup and intergroup differences were examined by using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Kruskal-Wallis test.

RESULTS

Spontaneous pain in the masticatory muscles was relieved significantly in all groups at the 6-week visit (P < .05), and no significant difference was found among the groups (P > .05). Palpation pain was relieved significantly at the 9-week visit in the counseling + occlusal splint therapy group, counseling + manipulation + electrophysiotherapy group, and counseling + occlusal splint + manipulation + electrophysiotherapy group (P < .05). In the treatment group with counseling alone, significant palpation pain relief occurred at 12 weeks. Chewing pain was relieved significantly at the 6-week visit in the counseling + occlusal splint therapy group, counseling + manipulation + electrophysiotherapy group, and counseling + occlusal splint + manipulation + electrophysiotherapy group (P < .05), yet no significant difference compared to the baseline was observed in the counseling-only group (P > .05). A significant increase in the maximal range of pain-free mouth opening was observed at the 9-week visit in the counseling + occlusal splint therapy group, and at the 3-week visit in the counseling + manipulation + electrophysiotherapy group and counseling + occlusal splint + manipulation + electrophysiotherapy group (P < .05). Nevertheless, no significant change in the range of mouth opening was found throughout the follow-up period in the counseling-only group (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

Each of the included treatment modalities relieved spontaneous pain and tenderness to palpation of the masticatory muscles during the follow-up intervals. Counseling alone did not help patients with chewing pain and limited mouth opening in the short term. Treatment protocols including counseling, occlusal splint therapy, and manipulation, integrated with electrophysiotherapy showed the best short-term outcomes for symptomatic improvement.

摘要

目的

对于颞下颌关节紊乱病患者咀嚼肌疼痛的管理,推荐采用保守治疗方法。本研究的目的是回顾性分析并比较四种保守治疗方法的效果:咨询及咬合板治疗、咨询及手法治疗联合电生理治疗、两种治疗方法联合应用以及单纯咨询。

方法与材料

本研究回顾性观察了168例伴有张口受限的肌痛患者。在2015年1月至2017年12月期间,63例患者接受了咨询及稳定性咬合板治疗(第1组),35例患者接受了咨询及手法治疗联合电生理治疗(第2组),33例患者接受了咨询、咬合板治疗、手法治疗联合电生理治疗(第3组),37例患者仅接受了咨询(第4组)。所有受试者均随访12周。临床评估记录咀嚼肌的自发痛强度、触压痛、咀嚼痛以及无痛最大张口度。采用方差分析(ANOVA)和Kruskal-Wallis检验分析组内和组间差异。

结果

在第6周复诊时,所有组咀嚼肌的自发痛均有显著缓解(P <.05),组间无显著差异(P >.05)。在咨询+咬合板治疗组、咨询+手法治疗+电生理治疗组以及咨询+咬合板+手法治疗+电生理治疗组,第9周复诊时触压痛有显著缓解(P <.05)。在单纯咨询治疗组,12周时触压痛有显著缓解。在咨询+咬合板治疗组、咨询+手法治疗+电生理治疗组以及咨询+咬合板+手法治疗+电生理治疗组,第6周复诊时咀嚼痛有显著缓解(P <.05),而单纯咨询组与基线相比无显著差异(P >.05)。在咨询+咬合板治疗组,第9周复诊时无痛最大张口度显著增加;在咨询+手法治疗+电生理治疗组以及咨询+咬合板+手法治疗+电生理治疗组,第3周复诊时无痛最大张口度显著增加(P <.05)。然而,在单纯咨询组,整个随访期间张口度无显著变化(P >.05)。

结论

在随访期间,每种纳入的治疗方法均缓解了咀嚼肌的自发痛和触压痛。单纯咨询在短期内对咀嚼痛和张口受限患者并无帮助。包括咨询、咬合板治疗、手法治疗联合电生理治疗的治疗方案在症状改善方面显示出最佳的短期效果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验