Dr. Michelotti is an associate professor and the head, Clinic for Temporomandibular Disorders and Orofacial Pain, University of Naples Federico II, Italy.
J Am Dent Assoc. 2012 Jan;143(1):47-53. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2012.0018.
The authors conducted a clinical trial to compare the effectiveness of an education program with that of an occlusal splint in treating myofascial pain of the jaw muscles across a short period.
The authors assigned 44 patients randomly to two treatment groups; 41 patients completed the study. The first group (four male, 19 female; mean [standard deviation {SD}] age, 31.4 [14.0] years) received information regarding the nature of temporomandibular disorder (TMD) and self-care measures, whereas the second group (five male, 13 female; mean [SD] age, 31.1 [8.8] years) received an occlusal splint. One of the authors evaluated each patient every three weeks during a three-month treatment period. Treatment outcomes included pain-free maximal mouth opening, spontaneous muscle pain, pain during chewing and headache.
After three months, changes in spontaneous muscle pain differed significantly between the education and occlusal splint groups (P = .034; effect size = 0.33). Changes in pain-free maximal mouth opening did not differ significantly between groups (P = .528; effect size = 0.20). Changes of headache and pain on chewing did not differ significantly between groups (P ≥ .550, effect size ≤ 0.10).
During a short period, education was slightly more effective than an occlusal splint delivered without education in reducing spontaneous muscle pain in patients with TMD. Pain-free mouth opening, headache and pain during chewing were not significantly different between the two treatments.
作者进行了一项临床试验,比较了在短时间内,教育计划和咬合夹板治疗咀嚼肌肌筋膜疼痛的效果。
作者将 44 名患者随机分为两组治疗组;41 名患者完成了研究。第一组(4 名男性,19 名女性;平均[标准差]年龄,31.4[14.0]岁)接受了关于颞下颌关节紊乱(TMD)和自我保健措施的信息,而第二组(5 名男性,13 名女性;平均[标准差]年龄,31.1[8.8]岁)接受了咬合夹板治疗。在三个月的治疗期间,作者之一每三周评估一次每位患者。治疗结果包括无痛最大张口度、自发性肌肉疼痛、咀嚼时疼痛和头痛。
三个月后,教育组和咬合夹板组之间的自发性肌肉疼痛变化差异有统计学意义(P =.034;效应大小= 0.33)。两组之间无痛最大张口度的变化无显著差异(P =.528;效应大小= 0.20)。头痛和咀嚼时疼痛的变化两组间无显著差异(P ≥.550,效应大小≤0.10)。
在短时间内,教育组在减轻 TMD 患者的自发性肌肉疼痛方面比未接受教育的咬合夹板治疗略有效。无痛张口度、头痛和咀嚼时疼痛在两种治疗方法之间无显著差异。