Suppr超能文献

评估教育与咬合夹板治疗咀嚼肌肌筋膜疼痛的短期疗效。

Evaluation of the short-term effectiveness of education versus an occlusal splint for the treatment of myofascial pain of the jaw muscles.

机构信息

Dr. Michelotti is an associate professor and the head, Clinic for Temporomandibular Disorders and Orofacial Pain, University of Naples Federico II, Italy.

出版信息

J Am Dent Assoc. 2012 Jan;143(1):47-53. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2012.0018.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The authors conducted a clinical trial to compare the effectiveness of an education program with that of an occlusal splint in treating myofascial pain of the jaw muscles across a short period.

METHOD

The authors assigned 44 patients randomly to two treatment groups; 41 patients completed the study. The first group (four male, 19 female; mean [standard deviation {SD}] age, 31.4 [14.0] years) received information regarding the nature of temporomandibular disorder (TMD) and self-care measures, whereas the second group (five male, 13 female; mean [SD] age, 31.1 [8.8] years) received an occlusal splint. One of the authors evaluated each patient every three weeks during a three-month treatment period. Treatment outcomes included pain-free maximal mouth opening, spontaneous muscle pain, pain during chewing and headache.

RESULTS

After three months, changes in spontaneous muscle pain differed significantly between the education and occlusal splint groups (P = .034; effect size = 0.33). Changes in pain-free maximal mouth opening did not differ significantly between groups (P = .528; effect size = 0.20). Changes of headache and pain on chewing did not differ significantly between groups (P ≥ .550, effect size ≤ 0.10).

CONCLUSIONS

During a short period, education was slightly more effective than an occlusal splint delivered without education in reducing spontaneous muscle pain in patients with TMD. Pain-free mouth opening, headache and pain during chewing were not significantly different between the two treatments.

摘要

背景

作者进行了一项临床试验,比较了在短时间内,教育计划和咬合夹板治疗咀嚼肌肌筋膜疼痛的效果。

方法

作者将 44 名患者随机分为两组治疗组;41 名患者完成了研究。第一组(4 名男性,19 名女性;平均[标准差]年龄,31.4[14.0]岁)接受了关于颞下颌关节紊乱(TMD)和自我保健措施的信息,而第二组(5 名男性,13 名女性;平均[标准差]年龄,31.1[8.8]岁)接受了咬合夹板治疗。在三个月的治疗期间,作者之一每三周评估一次每位患者。治疗结果包括无痛最大张口度、自发性肌肉疼痛、咀嚼时疼痛和头痛。

结果

三个月后,教育组和咬合夹板组之间的自发性肌肉疼痛变化差异有统计学意义(P =.034;效应大小= 0.33)。两组之间无痛最大张口度的变化无显著差异(P =.528;效应大小= 0.20)。头痛和咀嚼时疼痛的变化两组间无显著差异(P ≥.550,效应大小≤0.10)。

结论

在短时间内,教育组在减轻 TMD 患者的自发性肌肉疼痛方面比未接受教育的咬合夹板治疗略有效。无痛张口度、头痛和咀嚼时疼痛在两种治疗方法之间无显著差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验