• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用STarT Back工具预测退伍军人事务初级保健中持续性致残性腰痛

Predicting Persistent Disabling Low Back Pain in Veterans Affairs Primary Care Using the STarT Back Tool.

作者信息

Kneeman Jacob, Battalio Samuel L, Korpak Anna, Cherkin Daniel C, Luo Gang, Rundell Sean D, Suri Pradeep

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.

Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.

出版信息

PM R. 2021 Mar;13(3):241-249. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12488. Epub 2020 Nov 9.

DOI:10.1002/pmrj.12488
PMID:32902134
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Subgrouping for Targeted Treatment (STarT Back) is a stratified care approach to low back pain (LBP) treatment. The predictive validity of STarT Back in Veterans Affairs (VA) primary care has not been demonstrated.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the validity of the STarT Back tool for predicting future persistent disabling LBP in VA primary care.

DESIGN

Cohort study.

SETTING

VA primary care in Washington State.

PARTICIPANTS

Veterans seeking care for LBP in VA primary care clinics.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The STarT Back tool was used to classify Veterans according to their baseline risk group (low vs medium vs high). The primary study outcome, persistent disabling LBP, was defined as a Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) score ≥ 7 at 6-month follow-up. Analyses examined discrimination and calibration of the baseline STarT Back risk groups for prediction of persistent disabling LBP at 6-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Of the study sample, 9% were female and 80% reported longstanding LBP (>5 year duration). Among 538 participants, the baseline STarT Back risk groups were associated with future persistent disabling LBP at 6-month follow-up. Within each baseline STarT Back risk group, the proportions with future persistent disabling LBP at 6-month follow-up were 54% (low risk), 88% (medium risk), and 97% (high risk). The baseline STarT Back risk groups had useful discrimination (area under the curve [AUC] 0.79) for predicting future persistent disabling LBP, but the proportion of Veterans with persistent disabling LBP at 6-month follow-up was substantially higher than that observed in non-VA primary care settings.

CONCLUSIONS

The STarT Back risk groups had useful discrimination (AUC = 0.79) for future persistent disabling LBP, but calibration was poor, underestimating the risk of persistent disabling LBP. The STarT Back tool may require updating for use in VA primary care.

摘要

背景

针对性治疗分组(STarT Back)是一种用于腰痛(LBP)治疗的分层护理方法。STarT Back在退伍军人事务部(VA)初级保健中的预测效度尚未得到证实。

目的

检验STarT Back工具在VA初级保健中预测未来持续性致残性腰痛的效度。

设计

队列研究。

地点

华盛顿州的VA初级保健机构。

参与者

在VA初级保健诊所寻求腰痛治疗的退伍军人。

干预措施

不适用。

主要结局指标

使用STarT Back工具根据退伍军人的基线风险组(低风险组与中风险组与高风险组)进行分类。主要研究结局,即持续性致残性腰痛,定义为在6个月随访时罗兰-莫里斯残疾问卷(RMDQ)评分≥7。分析检查了基线STarT Back风险组在预测6个月随访时持续性致残性腰痛方面的区分度和校准情况。

结果

在研究样本中,9%为女性,80%报告有长期腰痛(病程>5年)。在538名参与者中,基线STarT Back风险组与6个月随访时未来持续性致残性腰痛相关。在每个基线STarT Back风险组中,6个月随访时出现未来持续性致残性腰痛的比例分别为54%(低风险组)、88%(中风险组)和97%(高风险组)。基线STarT Back风险组在预测未来持续性致残性腰痛方面具有有效的区分度(曲线下面积[AUC]为0.79),但6个月随访时患有持续性致残性腰痛的退伍军人比例明显高于非VA初级保健机构中的观察比例。

结论

STarT Back风险组在预测未来持续性致残性腰痛方面具有有效的区分度(AUC = 0.79),但校准情况较差,低估了持续性致残性腰痛的风险。STarT Back工具可能需要更新以用于VA初级保健。

相似文献

1
Predicting Persistent Disabling Low Back Pain in Veterans Affairs Primary Care Using the STarT Back Tool.使用STarT Back工具预测退伍军人事务初级保健中持续性致残性腰痛
PM R. 2021 Mar;13(3):241-249. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12488. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
2
Predictive Validity of the STarT Back Tool for Risk of Persistent Disabling Back Pain in a U.S. Primary Care Setting.STarT Back 工具在美国初级保健环境中预测持续性致残性腰痛风险的预测效度。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Aug;99(8):1533-1539.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.02.016. Epub 2018 Apr 3.
3
Can Primary Care for Back and/or Neck Pain in the Netherlands Benefit From Stratification for Risk Groups According to the STarT Back Tool Classification?根据STarT Back工具分类对风险群体进行分层,荷兰针对背部和/或颈部疼痛的初级保健能否从中受益?
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Jan;99(1):65-71. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.06.011. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
4
Discographic, MRI and psychosocial determinants of low back pain disability and remission: a prospective study in subjects with benign persistent back pain.下腰痛残疾与缓解的椎间盘造影、MRI及社会心理决定因素:一项针对良性持续性背痛患者的前瞻性研究
Spine J. 2005 Jan-Feb;5(1):24-35. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.05.250.
5
6
Convergent and Discriminative Validity of the PROMIS Physical Function 4 Questionnaire for Assessing Pain-related Disability in Low Back Pain Patients Seeking Chiropractic Care.用于评估寻求脊医治疗的腰痛患者疼痛相关残疾的 PROMIS 物理功能 4 问卷的会聚和判别有效性。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2022 Sep 15;47(18):1314-1320. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004391. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
7
The predictive ability of the STarT Back Tool was limited in people with chronic low back pain: a prospective cohort study.STarT 后背工具在慢性下背痛患者中的预测能力有限:一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Physiother. 2018 Apr;64(2):107-113. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2018.02.009. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
8
The effectiveness of a stratified group intervention using the STarTBack screening tool in patients with LBP--a non randomised controlled trial.分层组干预使用 STarTBack 筛查工具对腰痛患者的疗效——一项非随机对照试验。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013 Dec 5;14:342. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-342.
9
Predictive ability of the start back tool: an ancillary analysis of a low back pain trial from Danish general practice.起始回溯工具的预测能力:丹麦全科医疗中一项腰痛试验的辅助分析
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Aug 23;18(1):360. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1727-6.
10
Psychological predictors of recovery from low back pain: a prospective study.腰痛康复的心理预测因素:一项前瞻性研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Mar 7;16:49. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0509-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Strategies for combining interventional and behavioral therapies in management of chronic low back pain: A scoping review.慢性下腰痛管理中联合介入治疗与行为疗法的策略:一项范围综述
Interv Pain Med. 2025 Feb 16;4(1):100551. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2025.100551. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Description and initial validation of a novel measure of pain intensity: the Numeric Rating Scale of Underlying Pain without concurrent Analgesic use.描述并初步验证一种新的疼痛强度测量方法:不使用同时使用的镇痛药的基础疼痛数字评定量表。
Pain. 2024 Jul 1;165(7):1482-1492. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003150. Epub 2024 Jan 2.
3
Predicting decompression surgery by applying multimodal deep learning to patients' structured and unstructured health data.
应用多模态深度学习技术,通过患者的结构化和非结构化健康数据预测减压手术。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Jan 6;23(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-02096-x.
4
Improving Power and Accuracy in Randomized Controlled Trials of Pain Treatments by Accounting for Concurrent Analgesic Use.通过考虑同时使用的镇痛剂来提高疼痛治疗的随机对照试验的效力和准确性。
J Pain. 2023 Feb;24(2):332-344. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2022.09.017. Epub 2022 Oct 8.
5
A Scoping Review of Chronic Low Back Pain Classification Schemes Based on Patient-Reported Outcomes.基于患者报告结局的慢性下背痛分类方案的范围综述。
Pain Physician. 2022 Sep;25(6):471-482.
6
The Flares of Low back pain with Activity Research Study (FLAReS): study protocol for a case-crossover study nested within a cohort study.腰痛活动相关性 flares 研究(FLAReS):一项嵌套于队列研究中的病例交叉研究方案。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Apr 21;23(1):376. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05281-1.