Department of Kinesiology, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON.
School of Human Kinetics, Laurentian University, Sudbury, ON.
Can J Diet Pract Res. 2021 Mar 1;82(1):16-20. doi: 10.3148/cjdpr-2020-022. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
This paper investigated how traditional media headlines framed the release of Canada's Food Guide (CFG) online in 2019 and how audiences reacted to its release on social media. Titles of online news articles, Facebook comments on news stories, and tweets from Twitter were collected using Meltwater and manual data collection. Leximancer software conducted conceptual extraction and relational analyses on written words and visual text. Human coding was completed to contextualize the content, which identified 9 prominent frames (food guide, impact, health, sustainable plant food, who will use?, Canadian culture, food and consumption practices, meat, and dairy). Results suggested that online news headlines highlighted CFG release and alluded to potential impacts. Analysis of Facebook comments revealed that the most commonly discussed frames were health, food and consumption behaviours, sustainable plant food, and meat, while the majority of the tweets were in direct reference to CFG being released, oftentimes with a link to another webpage, and discussed the intersect between health and food and consumption practices. In conclusion, the analysis revealed how frames emerged from social media users that shifted the discussion away from CFG release and impact to the influence of health and food and a plant versus meat debate.
本文研究了传统媒体标题如何在 2019 年对加拿大食品指南(CFG)的在线发布进行框架构建,以及受众对其在社交媒体上发布的反应。使用 Meltwater 和手动数据收集收集了在线新闻文章的标题、新闻故事的 Facebook 评论和来自 Twitter 的推文。Leximancer 软件对书面文字和视觉文本进行了概念提取和关系分析。完成人工编码以对内容进行上下文分析,确定了 9 个突出的框架(食品指南、影响、健康、可持续植物食品、谁将使用?、加拿大文化、食品和消费行为、肉类和乳制品)。结果表明,在线新闻标题突出了 CFG 的发布,并暗示了潜在的影响。对 Facebook 评论的分析显示,讨论最多的框架是健康、食品和消费行为、可持续植物食品和肉类,而大多数推文直接提到 CFG 的发布,通常带有指向另一个网页的链接,并讨论了健康与食品和消费行为之间的交叉点。总之,分析结果揭示了社交媒体用户如何形成框架,使讨论从 CFG 的发布和影响转移到健康和食品以及植物与肉类的辩论上。