Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.
Division of Hospital Medicine, Parkland Memorial Hospital, Dallas, Texas.
JAMA Cardiol. 2021 Jan 1;6(1):92-96. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.3723.
Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)-lowering therapies are a cornerstone of prevention in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. With the introduction of generic formulations and the release of new therapies, including proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors, contemporary Medicare utilization of these therapies remains unknown.
To determine trends in utilization and spending on brand-name and generic LDL-C-lowering therapies and to estimate potential savings if all Medicare beneficiaries were switched to available therapeutically equivalent generic formulations.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional study analyzed prescription drug utilization and cost trend data from the Medicare Part D Prescription Drug Event data set from 2014 to 2018 for LDL-C-lowering therapies. A total of 11 LDL-C-lowering drugs with 25 formulations, including 16 brand-name and 9 generic formulations, were included. Data were collected and analyzed from October 2019 to June 2020.
Number of Medicare Part D beneficiaries, annual spending, and spending per beneficiary for all formulations.
The total number of Medicare Part D beneficiaries ranged from 37 720 840 in 2014 to 44 249 461 in 2018. The number of Medicare beneficiaries taking LDL-C-lowering therapies increased by 23% (from 20.5 million in 2014 to 25.2 million in 2018), while the associated Medicare expenditure decreased by 46% (from $6.3 billion in 2014 to $3.3 billion in 2018). Lower expenditure was driven by greater uptake of generic statin and ezetimibe and a concurrent rapid decline in the use of their brand-name formulations. Medicare spent $9.6 billion on brand-name statins and ezetimibe and could have saved $2.1 billion and $0.4 billion, respectively, if brand-name formulations were switched to equivalent generic versions when available. The number of beneficiaries using PCSK9 inhibitors since their introduction in 2015 has been modest, although use has increased by 144% (from 25 569 in 2016 to 62 476 in 2018) and total spending has increased by 199% (from $164 million in 2016 to $491 million in 2018).
Between 2014 and 2018, LDL-C-lowering therapies were used by 4.8 million more Medicare beneficiaries annually, with an associated $3.0 billion decline in Medicare spending. This cost reduction was driven by the rapid transition from brand-name formulations to lower-cost generic formulations of statins and ezetimibe. Use of PCSK9 inhibitions, although low, increased over time and could have broad implications on future Medicare spending.
降低低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)的治疗方法是动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病预防的基石。随着通用制剂的引入和新疗法的推出,包括前蛋白转化酶枯草溶菌素/克氏蛋白酶 9(PCSK9)抑制剂,当前医疗保险对这些疗法的使用情况尚不清楚。
确定品牌和通用 LDL-C 降低疗法的使用和支出趋势,并估计如果所有医疗保险受益人都转换为可用的治疗等效的通用制剂,潜在的节省。
设计、设置和参与者:这项横断面研究分析了 2014 年至 2018 年 Medicare 部分 D 处方药事件数据集的 LDL-C 降低疗法的处方药利用和成本趋势数据。共包括 11 种 LDL-C 降低药物,有 25 种制剂,包括 16 种品牌和 9 种通用制剂。数据于 2019 年 10 月至 2020 年 6 月收集和分析。
所有制剂的 Medicare 部分 D 受益人数、年度支出和每位受益人的支出。
2014 年至 2018 年,Medicare 部分 D 受益人数范围从 37720840 人增加到 44249461 人。服用 LDL-C 降低疗法的医疗保险受益人数增加了 23%(从 2014 年的 2050 万人增加到 2018 年的 2520 万人),而相关的医疗保险支出减少了 46%(从 2014 年的 63 亿美元减少到 2018 年的 33 亿美元)。较低的支出是由于更广泛地使用了通用他汀类药物和依折麦布,以及其品牌制剂的使用迅速下降所致。医疗保险在品牌他汀类药物和依折麦布上的支出为 96 亿美元,如果在可用时将品牌制剂转换为等效的通用版本,医疗保险本可以节省 21 亿美元和 4.04 亿美元。自 2015 年推出以来,PCSK9 抑制剂的使用人数一直不多,尽管使用量增加了 144%(从 2016 年的 25569 人增加到 2018 年的 62476 人),总支出增加了 199%(从 2016 年的 1.64 亿美元增加到 2018 年的 4.91 亿美元)。
在 2014 年至 2018 年期间,每年使用 LDL-C 降低疗法的医疗保险受益人增加了 480 万人,医疗保险支出减少了 30 亿美元。这种成本降低是由于从品牌制剂向更便宜的他汀类药物和依折麦布通用制剂的快速转变。尽管 PCSK9 抑制剂的使用量较低,但随着时间的推移,其使用量有所增加,这可能对未来的医疗保险支出产生广泛影响。